Thursday, May 26, 2011

State of Texas et al;Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services"

State of Texas et al;    
Texas Department of Aging and
        Disability Services

December, 29th 2009

                                Commissioner Adelaide Horn
Shirley Turner
Program Manager
And copy on file
For Governor et al

Dear Ms. /Mrs. Turner this formal letter is in regards to Complaint Identification Number 21883 made by Louis Charles Hamilton II,  in regards to the conditions as described early by me.

        Please understand that just because you formally told Joyce M. Guy to stop her illegal activities on during the month of December 2009; as requested by me
 That she G & G Services would actually listen to the State of Texas and as if you” (Texas);
 Can make her G & G Services et al understand the err of her twisted & crooked ways.

        Upon information and belief’s the actions I have described in ID # 21883 and at which the State of Texas (DADS) department has executed upon as described in detail’s there in, and as further which the State of Texas (DADS) was in complete phone contact with me (Hamilton) up till the time the investigator drove direct to owner of G & G Services home/location and pay a formal (Texas) visit via (Hamilton) information being provided in regards to the original complaint; I (Hamilton) filed for the State of Texas (DADS) behalf to investigate for a full, final, and complete investigation.

        To: The State of Texas et al:

Sherlock Holmes movie just came out this Christmas Day and before I go and see it”
 I want everyone including (DADS) to respectfully answer this mental question for me in their official mental mind:

        1. How can you prove to me that a patient has not wrongfully and unjustly already die in the wrongful care of “G & G services” operated by a crook (whom just happen to having a bullet lodge in her brains and (they) ‘’ G & G services call for an ambulance and had his or her “wrongful victim” rush to the local e.r. in the past along with her employees in on this scheme of things.
        2. How can you prove to me (beside “me” proving to myself) that she G & G Services is still sneaking around doing what her dumb ass has been doing all in the past as described by me since 1997 and gaining all of this wrongful revenue at the hands of the elderly citizens in Jefferson county, TX and still thinking that the State of Texas is a piece of crap to put money in my pocket..!
        3. And what about all of this information in regards of accounts receivable in this third bank account in her mother name listed for this company “G & G Services at Capitol One Bank in Port Arthur, Texas.
        4. And what other fraud acts having all ready been perpetrated upon these patient(s) without their knowledge…!
 At the hands of “G and G” Services et al.


                        “Have a happy New Year in 2010”


        Respectfully Yours,


        Louis Charles Hamilton II

Hurricane Umberto Attorney Scank Thong Rat Puss Face Motion for Contempt of Court"

                        In The District Court
                        Jefferson, County Texas
                         58th District Court
                        Bob Wortham, Honorable Judge
                        Civil No. A-180805
Louis Charles Hamilton II
                        Plaintiff 
                Vs.
Joyce M. Guy
Edward McCray
                        Defendant(s)
                                Motion for Sanctions and Motion for Contempt of Court
        Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II,
Appearing in this Cause No. A-180805
        Moves the Honorable Court for a Joint Order for Sanctions and Contempt of a Court Order being entered into the records against Defendants (Guy and McCray) collectively herein and for Cause Plaintiff will show as follows:
1. The Plaintiff set a hearing before the Honorable Court on 9/11/2009 to Compel Discovery evidence and responses to initial Disclosure Request.
2. The Honorable Court Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed those Defendants through their Attorney of record (Freeman) must answer and respond to the request for production propounded by the Plaintiff by the Court ordered date of November 6th 2009,
 To produce all Discovery Materials as stated in the Plaintiff Motion for Discovery, and supply answer(s) as stated for in Plaintiff Initial Disclosure request.
 Which the Honorable Court granted and or Ordered an extended amount of time of approximately (60) day’s for Defendant(s) Collectively through counsel to produce said Court Ordered Discovery request(s) with time running from 9/11/2009 through 11/06/2009. As described in previous Order of the Court filed and attached to the court records therein.
 3. The Attorney of record and Defendant(s) Collectively boldly refuse the Honorable said Court Orders as of this undersign date with the clerk of court records, files and transcripts standing as evidence of these facts no Production of document(s) having been produce .
4. as a direct result of the actions of both former Counsel of Record (Freeman) and Defendant(s) (Guy and McCray) Collectively Bold refusal of Said Honorable Court Orders,
 The Pro Se Plaintiff has suffered the Following:
        1. Additional (90) day’s time lost and wasted in this civil action on a discovery that was order to be produce by the Defendant(s) and their former Attorney of record which is intentional and directed at among other things the Plaintiff lawful discovery request already achieved before the Honorable 58th District Court,
 Notwithstanding facts, the original sanction on file already filed against Attorney of record for Bad Faith tactic in his bold refusal of over a year plus period of period to even simply reply to say discovery request(s) and the hostile actions involved in this previous period directed at the Plaintiff.
        2. Cost of Travel to Beaumont Texas, for an additional Court hearing on this matter alone, plus room and board for (2) night hotel accommodations in Beaumont Texas,
which the Plaintiff lives Now outside of Jefferson County, Texas for Plaintiff safety away from Defendants (Guy and McCray) and counsel of record (Freeman) herein.
        3. The Plaintiff further being detained and not able to have possession of his own construction tool’s with a Employment Construction lost pay rate at $58.00 per hour and active loss since November 17th 2007 and this is January 27th , 2010 with the additional excess of (90) days added in the Plaintiff further being detained from his construction trade
And the Plaintiff further being kept from his trade & Tools throughout the dates of February 16th 2010
And the Plaintiff like to point out facts that this action commence on the 26th day of November of 2007
        4. The Plaintiff Construction Picture(s) portfolio and blueprints being destroyed and not produce by the Defendant(s) as additionally Order by the Court for Defendant(s) herein to do so,
With a cost of blueprints at $3,500
 And the Photo’s being priceless.
        5. The Plaintiff incurred additional legal expense for Consultation Attorney’s Fees with the Harris Law Firm at the cost of $225.00 per hour @ (2) hours for a total of $450.00 for the Plaintiff consultation involving a additional Attorney aiding the Plaintiff understanding in Plaintiff claims of underhand tricks/delays and Bad faith tactics by both the Attorney of record (Freeman),
 In addition, Defendants (Guy and McCray) actions in all aspects of this action “primary” turning over already ordered discovery materials request which the Plaintiff already obtain on his own accord without an Attorney aid.
        6. The Plaintiff continue to suffer Mental Anguish & Distress in dealing with (among other things) this additional matter in still trying to proceed lawfully before his Honorable Court, and obtain favorable discovery materials to support the Plaintiff Claims in this action.
        Wherefore the Plaintiff moves the Honorable Court for the Following:
        1. The Plaintiff being awarded Compensation for travel cost and hotel accommodations in excess of ($280.00), with further award for cost of Attorneys legal fees ($450.00), and further compensation for loss Blueprints in excess of ($3500.00);
        2. The Plaintiff further being awarded Compensation for lost of Pictures Portfolio in an amount determined by this court since the Plaintiff is unable to put a price on such a priceless and wrongful lost.
        3. The Plaintiff being awarded compensation for lost of time from 9/11/2009 throughout 2/16/2010, which the Court granted Defendant such, a period to produce said discovery and said defendants having way gone over the time allotment of November 6th 2009 to produce said discovery request to the Plaintiff
Award in an amount of the Plaintiff construction pay rate of $58.00 per hour x 8 hours per day = 464.00 per day x the present date of 2/16/2010
        4. The Plaintiff being awarded compensation for time lost from 11/06/09 throughout December 11th 2009 at the same rate as described in paragraph (3) above;
        5. The Plaintiff being Awarded Punitive/Exemplary damages for the additional mental Anguish and Emotional distress being placed upon the Plaintiff (Hamilton) in this action for the Defendants (GUY and McCray) acts and actions in refusal of turning over all discovery request after Plaintiff obtain said Court Order for Defendants to do so, As described above,
To include but not limited to Plaintiff unwanted additional waste of time in this Civil Action at the hands of the Defendants.
        6. The Honorable Court hold the Defendants Collectively (Guy and McCray) in contempt of Court and fine accordingly;
In addition, said Defendant(s) Order to stay in Jefferson County Jail until all of the document(s) previously requested having been produced.
        7. The Plaintiff will produce additional facts, exhibits and evidences during open court oral arguments.
        7. The Plaintiff being awarded any and all other monetary awards, and or civil fines the Court Deems Just and proper on the behalf of the above Pro Se Plaintiff in this action.

 Dated the _______ day of __________, 2010

        By, ____________________________
                Louis Charles Hamilton II
                Pro Se Plaintiff
                P.O. Box, 20126
                Houston, Texas 77225

Hurricane Katrina Trial vs. Willie M. Zanders Esq. et al

In The United States District Court
                        For the Eastern District of Louisiana
                        New Orleans Division
                        Civil No. 1:09-CV-7029 L (4)
Louis Charles Hamilton II
                        Plaintiff 
                Vs.                                                          
Walter A. Dennis                                 Plaintiff Motion for
Rosemary Dennis                                Contempt of Court
                        Defendant(s)    
          
        Comes Now the Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby Move the Honorable U.S. District Court for an entry into the records of this preceding that the Defendant(s) collectively as described above being (Walter A. Dennis and Rosemary Dennis) is further held in contempt of an Honorable U.S. District Court Order;
        The Plaintiff appearing Pro Se, Respectfully assert and moves the Honorable Court to issues the following on behalf of his over due interest incurred in all legal claims and matters
To include the Plaintiff great concerns of passing the already fast approaching (5) year mark, into another (2) more years of dealing with the Defendant(s) “FEMA Corruption” and their crafty black magical legal practicing Rouge Attorney
Thus soon making this a (7) year sentence of legal pain and financial suffering the Plaintiff past has under gone by way of all of the numerous Fraudulent activities of the Defendant(s) and their current past/present rouge Attorney acting on their behalf;
To include but not limited to said fraud upon (2) U.S. District Courts by Defendants appearing Pro Se with the guise of actually being lead by said past/present rouge Attorney counsel of record during a legal federal proceeding, up to the point the defendant(s) presented evidence of their displeasure in an Attorney whom filing a Motion of some sort to move this action from the Federal Jurisdiction of this Court to a State court in New Orleans, LA
Defendant(s) now file their collectively and by all means “legal Notice” stating their total refusal to provide all “banking records” as required for them to do so
(To the effect of Defendant sighting some secrete banking documentation(s) for “their eyes only”; and it’s too sensitive to divulge to the Plaintiff
 Add with the further effect of, the Plaintiff need not apply during the current litigation and the Honorable Court well you too need not apply a Court Order neither, in the current U.S. District Court for said discovery of among other things the Banking records of (Collectively The Dennises”),
 And the Honorable Court, and the Plaintiff both can take a back seat and wait on the back woods underhand style fashion of the current Attorney new filing to proceed and occurred,
And his magic snaking oil legal Voodoo documentations of some sorts being filed in some back wood swamp “Court house” clerk office near the old cemetery’ where you take the left, by the old “hang them high oak tree”;
Regardless of the fore mention Honorable Court previously orders for said Defendant(s) Dennis et al to produce said all described Banking records in said timely fashion as set by the Honorable Court;
Among other things Defendants Dennis et al is in denial to produce and in refusal to comply with said Honorable U.S. District Court orders,
To include but not limited to facts surrounding this action is in fact filed, and currently being manage correctly before an Honorable U.S. District Court within the guidelines of the United States Civil federal Court Laws”.
Defendant(s) collectively further foolishly making appearance of some sort of legal maneuver to fashion a pre-judgment back-wood underhand style fashion attached to such a bold statement of moving this present action from the U.S. District Court already declared jurisdiction to render judgment over now
 To some unknown snaking oil, back wood alligator swamp court house, near the old cemetery’ where you take the left, by the old “hang them high”; oak tree”;
While Defendant(s) furthering in providing more delays in this already over due process in which they now filed some receipt of sort of some “Magical Attorney billing” @ $225.00 per hour for a retainer ($2,500) whom said Magical Attorney is now going to reach out And produce a “magic wand” to preformed such a never (I) never before heard of feast of a Judicial biblical proportion
 And overturn a ruling by a “out ranking” no less; U.S. District court already declared Diversity ruling in favor of the Plaintiff now in favor of the Defendant(s);
To include but not limited to facts that the Plaintiff is now or will he ever, ever be under any obligation of the sort to appear in a Voodoo cemetery swamp style kangaroo Court house proceeding to argue over Defendant(s) collectively “FEMA FRAUD” among other Hoist of Fraudulent acts and further “ungodly” fraudulent “scheme of things” involving Volunteers ;
 To include facts any process sever so foolish enough to cross the “Texas State Line” with such Voodoo Documentations, I, the Plaintiff; hereby state; Louis Charles Hamilton II, would personally sick (4) hunger hound dogs on his no good gutter slim process serving hide” all the way back to the snaking oil back wood alligator swamp voodoo Kangaroo Court House judicial district where he crawl out of the cemetery from.

*Judicial Note:
 The Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests with “Pure Hawaii sugar on top of the Honorable Court that during this Hearing of a Judicial biblical proportion the Defendant(s) intend to execute while refusing a U.S. District Magistrate Judge Honorable Court order(s) may the Plaintiff:
a.  Bring some food: Like a Pork Chop Sandwich with deluxe craft cheese/tomatoes light mustard and hot Cajun sauce and some chili cheese nachos to the big game..! With a cold colt 45 40oz Old School Beer to wash it all down with And sit in the Jury Box section and watch the Coolest Legal Joisting match ever”; Plaintiff promise he will try not to vomit from the obvious “legal bloodshed”.
b. May the Plaintiff also please, “pretty please”, wager all of his current money & holdings with interest incurred that the defendant(s) Dennis et al already owe to the Plaintiff and being able to place a large bet with the Nevada Gaming Commission Sport Booking system on The U.S. District Court to place first and win match over the snaking oil back wood alligator swamp court house Voodoo Jurisdiction legal future filing.
c. Would the Plaintiff be exempt from any possible criminal charges derived by the (SEC) Security Exchange Commission for “insider trading information” for the Plaintiff already have normal commonlegal sense” to bet on the U.S District Court.
d. Will this Attorney of some sort have standing if he file this Motion before this Honorable U.S. Court and is he allowed even in the door to have the Court U.S. District move the Jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court Jurisdiction in to a lower state court of some sort or will the lower court shall overturn the U.S. District Honorable Court….? Plaintiff very curious
The Plaintiff further respectfully state to the Honorable Court that the Defendant(s) refuse to provide any documentation(s) which would support and provide the exact location to the Third party Insurances company provider of said funds during the ordeal other than a P.O. Box address and or provide the local New Orleans Insurances company mail address and business day time phone number, with local agent(s) names
To include the Defendant(s) marked up the entire few photo’s submitted as they are foolishly making their legal arguments in a Production of Document compel phase and filing the same with the Courts and left out a large portion of all photos of the 24 exposures of two different construction film footage.
To include the photos are limited only to what the defendants wanting to present in the present filed arguments by way of showing only two rooms in the home and not all of the full contents of all of the entire finish construction its material and that what was being preformed by way of all of the materials, and showing lighting/cabinets/toilets/ ect…
With computation of cost in support of each picture and other required home fixing materials as required by the large Funds that’s was disbursed by private insurances companies and Federal FEMA Disaster Relief Funding programming
To include the Defendant(s) refuse to provide all of the building materials documentations as requested which Plaintiff assert he purchase even the “Sheet rock Materials” the “Honest church Volunteers from “New Hampshire” installed Court;
To include Plaintiff submit facts that there was indeed a additional new roof installed in which also defendant(s) continue failing to provide discovery documents supporting these factors;
And additional construction applications being performed on said property with additional Insurance funds being forward to defendant(s) herein for said “New Roof”.
To include but not limited to the Plaintiff Respectfully and Strongly Assert before the Honorable Court just for “Kick”-n- Giggles” that the Plaintiff is in some way at fault as described by the Defendant(s):
        a. Why are “Church volunteers” all the way from the state of “New Hampshire” no less hanging, floating and texturing sheet rock the Plaintiff purchased in the defendant(s) collective home;
 When said defendant(s) foolishly having already submitted to the above entitled Honorable Court such evidences by way of check issued 11/14/05 in the amount of $46,185.50, check issued 12/29/05 in the amount of $17,200.00, check issued in the amount of $8543.00 and check issued in the amount of $10,500.00 dollars for a total amount of in excess of $82,428.50..?
        b. What happen to the disaster disbursement funding difference in total funding said defendant(s) having already received in comparison to the breach of contract amount being argue and claimed for before the Honorable Court..?
The Plaintiff hereby moves her’ “Honorable Court” for the Following reliefs:
1.  Entry into the records for a Contempt of Court being levy and charged against the Defendant(s).

2.  Defendant(s) Dennis et al being sanctions against and levy against for their combine hostile non-compliance action directed at the Plaintiff and his delayed discovery phase for Defendant(s) to comply with a legal court order by the above entitled Honorable Court
3.  And Plaintiff further being awarded computation monetary compensation in the amount of no less 58.00 per hours; per hourly rate per day in Contractor construction @ (6) days lost time dealing with this matter and the Defendants non-compliances during a legal federal court proceeding
The Honorable Court Issue an Immediate Order to the (USMS) United States Marshall Services for the following reliefs to be executed on behalf of the Plaintiff without any interference from said Defendant(s).
A. (USMS) Seizure all of the Defendant(s) entire banking records at all banking companies as required by the Plaintiff and the Honorable Court, with a Itemized banking monthly statement being seizure and provided for each month all transactions during out the dates as indicated for all, credit cards records, debit cards records, checking records, savings records, from the dates of august 28th, 2005 to August 28 2009 * Note U.S. Marshall Services to obtain records from each and all banking Institutions Defendant(s) having Possession of; Custody of; and control of;
B. (USMS) Seizure complete copies of all Defendant(s) Home repair construction photos both past and present that was half submitted to the Plaintiff and the Court; with all 24 exposure being obtain from the Defendants for previous photographs marked as Plaintiff exhibit (A) and exhibit (B) photos required in full Production by the said (USMS)
 To include (USMS) Seizure from the Defendant(s) a complete copies of all documents, notes, all construction pictures, contractor bills, invoices,  relating to Defendant(s) home repairs as a result of Hurricane Katrina August 29th 2005 with each said Document being catalog and identified.
C. (USMS) themselves to obtain physically all complete photographs of the “entire Home” of the Defendant(s) collectively the Dennises” located at 3826 General Taylor street in New Orleans LA  showing all fixtures, walls, floors, rooms, ac/heater units, lighting fixtures, Crown molding, roofing shingles, all walls, inside and out, all windows inside and out, attic space, bathrooms, bath rooms and shower/tubs, all flooring tile, all doors, stairs steps to include all (4) views of the main home both front and back and both sides of the home to include full film footage of inside and outside with zoom in and out pictures as needed and required to “depict and show the full effect” of required “film footage” of the defendant(s) Dennis et al “New home” being totally repair from top to bottom inside and out regardless of whom preformed said construction and without any interference from said Defendant(s).
D. (USMS) Seizure from the Defendant(s) a complete and correct copy(s) of all Insurance Documents containing the each correct address of all the Local Insurance Company and all other insurance documentations being provided during the time frame for during the Katrina Hurricane Claims process for damages submitted for by said Defendant(s);
E. (USMS) Seizure from the Defendant(s) a complete and correct copy(s) of all building materials receipts for Windows, Sheetrock and all other materials used in repairing said home defendant(s) refuse to comply with;
F. (USMS) Seizure from the Defendant(s) a complete and correct copy(s) of all documents and applications church documents and records from Defendant(s) showing/dealing with Request and provision of All Construction Working Non-Profit Volunteers whom provided free services on the defendant(s) entire home after Katrina Damages to include Seizure all photos showing all phase involving all Volunteers performing construction involvement type work on said Defendant(s) Home.
G. (USMS) Obtain/Seizure from the Defendant(s) their Home owner Insurance Company Local Listed Company correct mail address, day time telephone number, and all documents relating there in said defendant(s) custody, possession and control in regards to Katrina Claims for damages of the home located at 3826 General Taylor Street In New Orleans LA 701125 a complete and correct copy(s) of all documents, applications, Notes, Photographs, diagrams, contractor invoices/ billing, all material receipts and any and all other document(s) relating to 08/29/2005 Hurricane Katrina damages in connection to the defendant(s) home located at 3826 General Taylor Street In New Orleans LA 701125 to include but not limited to the (USMS) on behalf of the Plaintiff obtain all records documents, applications, Notes, Photographs, diagrams, contractor invoices/ billing, material receipts and any other documents relating to Katrina damages and to include (USMS) on behalf of the Plaintiff execute all of the same as described in paragraph (G) above from Fidelity National Insurance Company P.O. Box 33005 St. Petersburg, FL 33733-8005 Policy Number 17251020862900   claim Number. 105-0066431.
H. (USMS) Obtain/Seizure from the United States Inspector General Office, and or FEMA Disaster Relief Disbursement/Funding Department to include but not limited to the (USMS) having to “boldly go” where no man has gone before within the United States Federal Government FEMA Services and obtain such required records involving all records of the Defendant(s) Dennis et al; total expensive received during their collectively needed and required evacuation from New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina approach to making land fall in said defendant(s) home town area, up to their collectively temporary housing funds being provide for by Federal Funding programs, to include but not limited to food, and all other documentations showing All Federal Funding Assistant programs being especially provided to the Defendant(s) During the moment Hurricane Katrina made land fall throughout up to the finish restore repairs of the Defendants home.
The Plaintiff further move the Honorable Court for an Additional order that require the (USMS) Obtain/Seizure from the Defendant(s) Collectively Know as the (Dennises”) all documents, notes, records, letters, invoices, bills paid to, retainer fee documentations, the correct physical address, day time telephone number, and full Identification, credentials, discovery, and correct ID of the Attorney and or Attorney(s) whom having been providing and executing on the behalf of said defendant(s) Collectively Know as the (Dennises”) all legal advice, and court filing documentations as described in Plaintiff attached motion for Contempt of a Honorable Court @ (2) counts and Joining Motions for sanctions collectively.
*See Plaintiff attachment exhibit(s) @ Plaintiff Motion for Contempt of Court” attached and join herein in support.
The Plaintiff further moves the Honorable Court that the Defendant(s) herein Collectively Know as the (Dennises”) being levy against and made to pay for all said services thereof and order by Her’ Honorable Court for execution of and on the behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff to this action; said The United States Marshall Services” with (USMS) collectively obtain their Personal Fee’s… (J) “as per Court Further Orders”.
To include but not limited to the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully moves the Honorable Court in being justly content in being compensated for the defendant(s) collectively additional Fraudulent activities as described in the attached Motion for Contempt of Court & Joining Motion for sanctions
To include any and all further reliefs the Honorable Court Deems specifically Just, right, and entirely proper for the Behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff in this Above Stated Cause. Civil No. 1:09-CV-7029 L (4)

Respectfully Submitted and

Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2010


        By, ____________________________
                Louis Charles Hamilton II
                Pro Se Plaintiff

Houston Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. et al Marine Building L.L.C. original Complaint"

                       In The District Court
                     ______ Judicial District
                      Harris County, Texas
                     Cause No._____________

Louis Charles Hamilton II
                        Plaintiff                        
Civil Complaint
                Vs.                                          Jury Trial Demand
Harry C. Arthur
The Marine Building, L.L.C. (et al)
                        Defendant(s)
                              
        Comes Now the Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby appearing Pro Se Plaintiff files this complaint against the above named Defendant(s)
 And for cause Plaintiff will show the Honorable U. S. District Court as follows: 
                                                I.
                                  Parties
       Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, is an African American Male, Homeless Permanent Disable Veteran, a recipient from the Humanitarian Church effort(s) of the Beacon in Houston, Texas
And its “Spiritual loving connection” to Bishop Charles Andrew Doyle,
 With its “supporting loving congregation flock” with the Christ Church Cathedral in Houston Texas at 1225 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002
In providing the Plaintiff (among the multitude of many, many, other(s)) with needed Hot Precious Food, opportunity for baths, Clothes, and Clean Laundry at these facilities (among many other things) being provided;
 To include but not limited to; if the need arise for the Plaintiff in the area of medical attention it to is also there at the onsite clinic, with occasional counsel for future apartment and housing needs mental health, and other Self Help Humanitarian Vendors doing unselfish the same effort(s) on behalf of the Plaintiff and many, many, others,
 To include but not limited to The Compass being located at the same facilities and in providing the Plaintiff (among many, many, others similarly situated) with unselfish Humanitarian Needs to the General Public as described above,
Regardless of Gender, Creed, Color, Religious preference, Sexual Orientation, Age, and or Mental/Physical Ability in association with the Beacon,
 And Christ Church Cathedral and the teaching of Jesus Christ.
Plaintiff hereafter name (Hamilton) is registered with the Beacon by his Last 4 Social Security # 2712 on file with the Beacon since Plaintiff move to Houston Texas area on August 18 2009 from Plaintiff Home county of Jefferson County, Texas
And Plaintiff is currently still living homeless in the Houston Texas downtown area, mailing address:
·      Louis Charles Hamilton II.
·      c/o U.S. Vet Center
·      1418 Preston Street
·      Houston, Texas 77002

Defendant(s): Harry C. Arthur (Attorney at law) within the State of Texas, TBN: 01364000 mailing address 1305 Prairie, Suite 200 Houston Texas 77002

Co-Defendant(s): the Marine Building, L.L.C., owner Harry C. Arthur one in the addresses as described above:
Defendant(s) may be served with a citation herein by serving Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law at the above stated address for the Defendant
                                II.
                        Case Level
Plaintiff, intends to conduct a complete discovery on a level 2 cause of action pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 190.3
Plaintiff respectfully seeks damage for Defamation, Discrimination, Intentional Infliction of emotional distress, Mental Anguish, Punitive/exemplary monetary relief(s) before a Jury Trial in excess of 2’400’000.00 (Two Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars)
To include but not limited to the Defendant: Harry C. Arthur finance and Print a Front page Public apology in the Houston News Paper,
 In the Interest of the Plaintiff in this above cause stating to the effects of Attorney Harry C. Arthur apologize to Derelict a.k.a (Hamilton);
To include but not limited to a Declaratory Judgment being entry into the records against all defendant(s) named here within for all of the act(s) as described by the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in this Complaint with interest incurred,
 To include all court cost and any other legal cost may arise during the course of this civil action.
                                Facts
Defendant(s) here within filed a civil action on the 23 day of November 2009 at 2:31 pm in the Harris County, Texas District Court, Cause No. 2009-75693
Which is attached as Plaintiff appendix exhibit (A) for full facts allege in the Defendant(s) here after named (Arthur et al) wrongful conduct against the rights and dignity of the Plaintiff as described therein.
Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) unflinchingly, courageously, with the audaciously bold potty mouth, and a appear lost aptitude on life,
 Accused the Plaintiff of being and I (Hamilton) quote verbatim a Derelict of Houston Texas, among other things
 And filed such a disgusting display of discriminatory practices and defamatory statement(s) before a Honorable Court of Law seeking to cause (among other things) the excitement frenzy in the News media directed at the Defendant(s) wrongful cause, among others media agencies for such an outlandish display of a wild and far out their brash discriminatory and defamatory conduct(s)
To include but not limited to the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) seeks damages from the Holy Church namely Christ Church Cathedral at 1225 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002
 In excess of ($50,000.00) Fifty Thousand Dollars and base this upon the described derelict conducts of the Plaintiff (Hamilton) and (many others) in which defendant(s) seeks to pilferage from the said church Christ Church Cathedral affiliation with the Beacon as stated in the complaint of the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al).
The Plaintiff assert strong condemnation for such a twisted heart full of unwashed socks,
 With a soul full of gunk Grinch type act(s) the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) attempt to disgracefully attempt to achieve at the expensive of the Holy Church, The Honorable Court, and The Plaintiff.
Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) having full knowledge that his actions would certainly cause a excitement and defendant was deliberate in doing so;
To include but not limited to causing the Plaintiff unwanted additional mental anguish and unwanted additional emotional distress for said conduct(s) of the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al)
 In which Plaintiff now having constant entertaining thoughts of wanting to bash in said defendant(s) grill” and peel his wig completely of his hide until HPD “Swat” arrival for said defendant(s) (Arthur et al) needed relief.
 Which the Plaintiff “wisely” instead sought the needed expedited medical attention at the VACM on the 16th day of December 2009 to obtain explain the defendant(s) actions before the Plaintiff Mental doctor
 and obtain additional medications for such mental needs in hopefully refraining the Plaintiff from entertaining such mental thoughts of going to the Defendant(s) place of business and beating him within an inch of his life with a black’s Law Dictionary, thus their after dragging him about the neck to the nearest toilet and give him a swirly potty mouth attitude adjustment treatment with further mental thoughts being entertained their after the Plaintiff taking a Permanent Black marker and write on the naked back of the Defendant Harry C. Arthur, Derelict lives here” with a long thick black arrow pointing down to the Defendant (Arthur)→ “bum hole”.  
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that the Plaintiff is not a derelict as described by the Defendant (Arthur et al) and in fact Plaintiff currently engaging in (3) civil actions before a U.S. District Court of Law and (1) civil action in Texas State District Court to achieve (among other things) breach of contract dispute for
Plaintiff lost revenue from being a construction contract being cheated after hurricane Katrina, Rita, and Umberto by crooked home owners. Among other positive things the Plaintiff having currently pursues.
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur et al) knew that the Plaintiff economic condition was that of a state of being poor, and chose to defame and discriminate against the Plaintiff for such an indigent status.
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that defendant(s) conduct was discriminatory towards Plaintiffs Status of also being a Disable American or alternatively a Disable American Veteran.
The Plaintiff will show this Court that the term Derelict is use under the (UCMJ) Uniform Code of Military Justice, which is a Charge that no Man or Services women would ever wanting attached to their indivual service jackets, and is to this date punishable under said (UCMJ) for “Derelict of Duty”.
The Plaintiff himself is a Navy Veteran, and if (Arthur et al) made such a statement during the course of the Plaintiff military services without a very good cause for such a charge
And had not very good evidence to produce such facts before a Captain Mast against the Plaintiff, (Arthur et al) would certainly & unexplainably be physically “lost at sea”.
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) having full knowledge that the demographic Census in Houston Texas make up of the population of Beacon clients is a majority within the African Americans community, which the Plaintiff is a race of African American decent, and this comment was directed at the Plaintiff race status of African American being in a state of Derelicts
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that at no time did the Plaintiff take a part in pissing, crapping and or vomiting or any other bodily fluid discharge being wrongfully place at the property of the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al).
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) has lied in his complaint to obtain monetary reliefs in regards to his property being in a state of lost revenue when facts dictate the following:
        a. The Marine Building is being under constant video tape with police patrol through the back area and all facts that said defendant stated in regards to sleeping on his property and rest room usage among other things is documented.
        b. At no time dose the Marine building post sentry and or security to deter such behavior.
        c. The Marine Building has over (12) separate tenets providing income/revenue into said build owner accounts and the majority of said income derives from said tenets being Attorney at Law residing in office space
Of the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) to include but not limited to the parking income the Build has generated
        d. at no time did the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) implement a low cost sprinkler system around the outside of the build on a timer to deter unwanted usage of his property for sleeping purpose and a low cost deterrent.
        e. Officer Cuffy and his fellow officers having been providing such extra police care to the Beacon and its clients and the general public in this area to include but not limited to the Defendant(s) interest as well
 That Police reports will prove such professional police response having taken place in this area of the city long before (Arthur et al) file his civil action and is contradicting the Defendant(s) claims before the Honorable Court.
        f. That Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) having no proof to provide before the Honorable Court that the Homeless Derelicts of Houston is the responsible party instead to the pissing, crapping and or vomiting on the said property instead of the General Public after leaving the local baseball arena, and or local clubs, their after using the parking facilities located around the Marine Building and having the need for emergency pissing, crapping, and or vomiting on the property of the Defendant(s).
        g. the Marine Build is no “Trump Plaza”.
Wherefore Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, request that Defendant (Trail) responds to the above Requests for Admissions propounded by the Plaintiff pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b) (1),
 In accordance with the Civil Laws of the above entitled United States District Honorable Court.



                On the _______ day of __________, 2009



        By, ____________________________
                Louis Charles Hamilton II
                Pro Se Plaintiff
                P.O. Box, 342
                Port Arthur, Texas 77640