AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "Attorney at Law" et al U.S. CAUSE No.1:14-CV-592

A.    Another “front company” located in Beaumont Texas. To include but not limited to J Can Company business operation and “Cars and Pieces” business operation (RICO) enterprise in State and Federal Tax Evasion.

B.      While J Can Company income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

C.     Assumed Name “Car and Pieces” in Beaumont Texas business operation from May 10^th 1990 while actually engaging in (RICO) enterprise in “money laundering” in scrap metal materials” in connection with assumed name business J Can Company in Port Arthur Texas. As described in paragraph (C) above.

D.    While “Car and Pieces” income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

E.     Assumed Name Paragon Business Inc. being a unknown company of sorts, current in business operation since May 17^th 2001 while Paragon Business Inc. income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

 

(16)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein continue to engage in among other things “obstruction of Justice” collaboration, racket, and

Plot in their collective (RICO) “defense” the direct refusal to produce among other things said 58^th Judicial District “Court Order” for discovery of the “property deeds”, and all records involved in Hurricane “Rita,

 Humberto, and Ike, in connection with the dwelling located at 448 DeQueen Blvd. in Port Arthur Texas as of this undersigned date in 2015.

And ruse, dodge, concealing, withholding, destroying, masking, obscuring all past, property deeds, banking records, contractor(s) construction insurances estimates and contract(s)  for (5)-(6) hurricane storm damages claims, homeowner private insurance records,

 FEMA records, (4)-(6) mutable private illegal business company records, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs housing records, State Tax Records, Sales Tax records, (IRS) Tax Records any document relating to any discovery into the corrupted (RICO) enterprise endeavor fully

                                                            (17)

 “Chief Defendant” Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 with legal intent to bring Pro Se Plaintiff “Civil Suit” in Common Law A-180805 to a full collapse lost civil cause of action in a well plan, visionary clever skilled lawyer strategy scheme to “first and foremost” make the bogus (RICO) fraudulent “representation and presentation” as acting “attorney of record” for the legal behalf of the Co-Defendant(s) collectively to the Pro Se Plaintiff,

While at the same time frame making the same bogus (RICO) fraudulent “representation and presentation” as being not the acting “attorney of record” before the Honorable 58^th Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas

 To execute withholding all discovery as now being escalated as described of the Grand (RICO) scheme of things involving the Pro Plaintiff alone in excess $127,339.31 scam of (2) U.S. Federal Housing Grant.

                                                            (18)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein

 USPS Tracking^™

Customer Service ›

Have questions? We're here to help.

Only applicable to visual users. More Details Less Details

Tracking Number: 70092820000295595205

 

in-transit

• Updated Delivery Day: Thursday, January 29, 2015

Product & Tracking Information

Postal Product:

• Priority Mail 2-Day^™

Features:

• Certified Mail^™
• Return Receipt
• Up to $50 insurance included

Restrictions Apply Priority Mail Insurance info icon

 

 

Date & Time	Status of Item	Location
January 29, 2015 , 10:53 am	Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available)	PORT ARTHUR, TX 77640
We attempted to deliver your item at 10:53 am on January 29, 2015 in PORT ARTHUR, TX 77640 and a notice was left because an authorized recipient was not available. You may arrange redelivery by visiting http://www.usps.com/redelivery or calling 800-ASK-USPS 800-ASK-USPS FREE, or may pick up the item at the Post Office indicated on the notice. If this item is unclaimed after 15 days then it will be returned to the sender.
January 29, 2015 , 8:29 am	Out for Delivery	PORT ARTHUR, TX 77640
January 29, 2015 , 8:19 am	Sorting Complete	PORT ARTHUR, TX 77640
January 29, 2015 , 7:15 am	Arrived at Unit	PORT ARTHUR, TX 77640
January 29, 2015 , 6:34 am	Departed USPS Facility	BEAUMONT, TX 77707
January 29, 2015 , 4:15 am	Arrived at USPS Origin Facility	BEAUMONT, TX 77707
January 28, 2015 , 10:37 pm	Arrived at USPS Origin Facility	NORTH HOUSTON, TX 77315
January 28, 2015 , 10:09 am	Acceptance	SUGAR LAND, TX 77479

 

Flat out in refusal to except any “certified Mail” from this particular Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in the State Court action

 

 A-180805 on January 29, 2015 , 10:53 am as being described

 

    Tracking Number: 70092820000295595205

 

For a “Writ of Attachment”, Summary Judgment, Contempt of Court hearing being held on the 19^th day of February 2015 before the 58^th Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas at 9:00 am hr.

Once Co-Defendant(s) collectively herein in 2015 again with such scuttle plans, to hide, melt, destroy, conceal, ruse, scheme, dodge, all records, or being a party thereof in this grand (RICO) scheme of things involving not only the Plaintiff but the entire “United States of America”

And “The State of Texas” in a half bake (RICO) combine “greedy racket enterprise” scheme of things that has accumulated gradually past acquisition of hidden (RICO) monetary earnings cars, possessions and properties estimates in excess of $980,000.00 U.S. dollars

 From the time frame of 1997-2015 and to include but not limited to the Grand (RICO) scheme of things involving the Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein alone in excess $127,339.31 monetary scam of (2) U.S. Federal Housing Grant.

                                                            (19)

Pro Se Plaintiff being respectful, before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”, and fully reincorporate all as stated in the original (TRO) for to freeze, all records and assets of the “Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299” and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein

With all supporting exhibit(s) on file with the U.S. Clerk in support thereof said (TRO) injunction and Motion to freeze records and assets and all supporting exhibit(s) now with the weight of

“Merit” attached herein fully in favor of granting Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein require protection of all discovery material(s) as already legally described herein the records of the U.S. Federal Civil Suit (RICO) action.

Wherefore respectfully, Pro Se Plaintiff moves before the Honorable U.S. Magistrate Judge to grant all such (TRO) asset, and document freeze in Justice, equity and relief.

Wherefore respectfully the Pro Se Plaintiff moves the cost of Court, Pro Se Plaintiff fees, and such other further relief as Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II may be entitled to in law or in equity.

Dated this ______ day of _______________, 2015

 

By, _______________________________

     Louis Charles Hamilton II

     Pro Se Plaintiff

      P.O. Box 17524

     Sugar Land Texas 77496

 

 

AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "Attorney at Law" et al U.S. CAUSE No.1:14-CV-592

                                                                     (15)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein further continue

(RICO) “Scheme of things” is involved in concealing, obscuring, masking, cloak and shielding corrupted fraudulent “mutable fraudulent business” enterprise operations the Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” herein concoct and obtaining massive hidden income over many years described as follows:

A.    Assumed name business “G & G Services” a fraudulent Medical services for obtain “monetary payments” from “Senior Aging Handicap Citizens within Jefferson County Texas which “G & G Services” was never even a litigable Licenses with the State of Texas from May 2^nd 1997- 2010 as being order shut down as described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (F) from the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services. *to include but not limited to “Tax Evasion” being directed at both the “State of Texas” and “The United States of America” for a actual time period of (13) plus years in this (RICO) illegal medical business operation fraudulent corrupted “scheme of things”. To include but not limited to upon information and belief “G & G Services” medical services is secretly still in business operation …….Omg (wow) J While “G & G Services” income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

B.     Assumed name business “E and J Collectibles” 448 DeQueen Blvd. in Port Arthur Texas which is in the Used Merchandise Stores business for a unknown amount of years having (2) companies in Port Arthur Texas “However” these (2) companies is not registries with “Jefferson County Texas, or the “State of Texas” fully engaging in among other things (RICO) enterprise in “Sales Tax Evasion”, *Business is current in operation as identified on the “internet” for a unknown accountability of time. While “E and J Collectibles” income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

C.     Assumed Name J Can Company in Port Arthur Texas business operation from April 11^th 2008 – 2015 this J Can Company business operation is a “front company” for (RICO) enterprise scheme of things in “among other things” besides hidden sells of “Crack cocaine” while actually engaging in (RICO) enterprise in “money laundering” in scrap metal materials” in connection with assumed name business “Cars and Pieces” another “front company” located in Beaumont Texas. To include but not limited to J Can Company business operation and “Cars and Pieces” business operation (RICO) enterprise in State and Federal Tax Evasion. While J Can Company income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

D.    Assumed Name “Car and Pieces” in Beaumont Texas business operation from May 10^th 1990 while actually engaging in (RICO) enterprise in “money laundering” in scrap metal materials” in connection with assumed name business J Can Company in Port Arthur Texas. As described in paragraph (C) above. While “Car and Pieces” income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

E.     Assumed Name Paragon Business Inc. being a unknown company of sorts, current in business operation since May 17^th 2001 while Paragon Business Inc. income not listed fully in “Financing Statement” of Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein to (RICO) fraudulent obtain Federal Housing Grant in excess of $72,500.00 U.S. dollars.

 

 

 

AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "Attorney at Law" et al U.S. CAUSE No.1:14-CV-592

 

                                                            (8)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s)

“Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein on or there after filed in District Court of Jefferson County Texas March 14^th 2008 1:48 pm having full discover request of the Pro Se Plaintiff as described

 To: Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 pursuant to rule 194, request for disclosure Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (R) herein

With certificate of mailing services attached and * filed also in District Court of Jefferson County Texas March 14^th 2008 1:48 pm

 To: Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 Plaintiff Motion for Production of Documents being Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (S) herein

                                                            (9)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein in exhibit(s) (A) and (B)

Already on file with the U.S. Clerk of Court maintain having knowledge possession, custody and control of Pro Se Plaintiff discovery was during the exact time frame of April 2^nd 2008 and April 11^th, 2008 which was fraudulent statements made before the 58^th Judicial District Court by

Defendant/Attorney of Record/ Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) collectively herein in comparison to Pro Se Plaintiff exhibit (R) and (S) attached herein showing “among other things” the actual request for copies of the “Property Deeds” the exact precise time frame which is a material issue in this civil action in common law to be on record of this civil action in March of 2008,

                                                            (10)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein on June 9^th 2009 1 year and 2 months in direct refusal to produce said property deeds

Completely there after conspire, plotted instead of producing the Property deed before the Honorable Court and to the Pro Se Plaintiff continue engaged in real (RICO) enterprise scheme of things and “Transfer of Lien” and “Property Deeds”, for the said dwelling located at 448 DeQueen Blvd in Port Arthur Texas to the

 “Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” Loan No. 2727 File No. 1219-2102152 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005

Federally Declared Disaster Funding under Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program (Homeowner Assistance Program “HAP”)

Or (Sabine Pass Restoration Program “SPRP”) Awarding Federal Agency: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development TDHCA Federal Award Number: B-06-DG-48-0002 Federal Award Year (Year of Award from HUD to TDHCA): 2006 TDHCA Award Year: 2007

As being described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit herein (Q) for $75,500.00 U.S. Housing Grant in unpaid “Principal and Interest” with a date of Maturity being June 8^th, 2012 when this civil suit in common law A-180805 commenced in December 26^th 2007 and Co-Defendant(s) already (RICO) fashion obtain funds for Hurricane Rita,

Humberto and Ike for covering cost of needed repair from previously storm damages as all of this was for private use other than actual home repairs as already legally described be the Pro Se Plaintiff herein providing additional proof for the

“Honorable U.S. Justice” a not so ordinary state case of Fraud but a grand 2005- 2014 (RICO) enterprise endeavor scheme of things well into future designed, and careful craftiness by

Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 herein to among other things appear in a live court hearing on August 28^th 2009 win the (TRO) hearing the Co-Defendant did in fact squander her mother insurance repair funds and disappear again claiming he “Attorney of Record” was never even there before the 58^th Judicial District Court he not the “Attorney of record to win a Motion for sanctions while being

 100% the retain expert skilled in Fraud Attorney fully rouge, hostile, and criminal in holding out on all “discovery phase” as already described against him legally.

 To the point Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (S) namely Plaintiff Motion for Production of Documents filed herein never ever even been answered as of this undersigned date.

                                                                        (11)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively herein working further fraudulent together,

 “Hand in hand” smiling in monetary victory as now being provided a document first time in Texas history an extra greedy not so a ordinary state case of Fraud but a grand (RICO) fraudulent enterprise endeavor scheme of things well into future designed, and careful craftiness by

Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 herein to engage now at this point after all fraudulent cover up all of the Fraud scheme of things as being described in paragraph

 (1)-(6) above against the property located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas to achieve another grand (RICO) enterprise endeavor scheme of things well into future designed, and careful craftiness against once again

 “Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” Loan No. 5866 File No. 1219-2355082 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005

 Federally Declared Disaster Funding under Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program (Homeowner Assistance Program “HAP”)

Or (Sabine Pass Restoration Program “SPRP”) Awarding Federal Agency: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development TDHCA Federal Award Number: B-06-DG-48-0002 Federal Award Year

 (Year of Award from HUD to TDHCA): 2006 TDHCA Award Year: 2007 to obtain on May 28^th 2010 in excess of $54,839.31 U.S. Dollars

“Construction Housing Grant” in unpaid “Principal and Interest” with a date of Maturity being well calculated and executed into 2015

                                                            (12)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively

(RICO) scheme of things in the direct refusal of the actual request in discover request dated back in March 14^th 2008 with a Court Order further following for such a Production of said “property deeds” now being Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (L) herein dated May 10^th 2010 notwithstanding factual events and circumstances said

Property deeds being officially “free and clear” from the “Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” Loan No. 2727 File No. 1219-2102152 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005 as filed and recorded April 22^nd 2014 at 12:38 pm

As described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (T) herein namely “Property Deeds” of the Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray” herein dated April 22^nd 2014for the dwelling located at 448 DeQueen Blvd in Port Arthur Texas

                                                            (13)

 With the Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray” herein fraudulent “Financing Statement” dated June 18^th 10:20 am filed as Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (U)

 And Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray” herein Termination of Fraudulent Financing Statement Amendment dated July 22^nd 2013 2:01 pm filed as Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (V)

 

                                                            (14)

Which Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299

And Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively further (RICO) scheme of things is involved in not being honest and providing full disclosure all of the actual Business being owned and all income derive thereof

“Namely” G & G services and E and J collectable in order to obtain fraudulent from the “Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” said Loan No. 2727 File No. 1219-2102152 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005 in excess of $72,500.00

Being directly in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code - Section 1001: Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,

knowingly and willfully - (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

        (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

       (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

AMEND TO MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, ASSETS, OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D., "Attorney at Law" et al U.S. CAUSE No.1:14-CV-592

In The United States District Court

For The Eastern Division of Texas

Beaumont Division

Louis Charles Hamilton II

         Pro Se Plaintiff

            Vs.                                                            Cause No. 1:14-CV-592

Antoine L. Freeman J. D.

           Defendant

Joyce M. Guy

Edward McCray

            Co-Defendant(s)

PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDMENT EXHIBIT(S) FOR

 (TRO) MOTION TO FREEZE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, AND ASSETS OF DEFENDANT ANTOINE L. FREEMAN J.D.  ATTORNEY AT LAW AND CO-DEFENDANT(S)

JOYCE M. GUY AND EDWARD McCRAY

                                                                        (1)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth

Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) herein directly conspire, plotted and fully assistance Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” in obtaining and covering up the additional (RICO) monetary fraud scheme of things involving with

 Hurricanes “Rita, Humberto, Wilma and Ike to the “property located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas Jefferson County “Lot number (10) in block number (4) of Lakeview addition  for an additional amount of $54,839.31 U.S. Dollars

                                                (2)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” having on the

28^th day of August 2009 in a “live courtroom hearing before the 58^th Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas “defeated” Pro Se Plaintiff attempt to protect “Norma Guy” legal Senior Citizen Rights” from her own fraudulent destructive daughter pattern and practices in (RICO)

Namely Co-Defendant “Joyce M. Guy” (RICO) enterprise scheme had commenced against another said Hurricane damaged “property” located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas.

Which the Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” herein enjoying a “Power of Attorney” relating to Real Property Transactions as Described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (O) herein “Specific Power of Attorney” executed on the 27^th day of May 2010

                                                (3)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” the Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” herein having already “squander” all of the entire Hurricane repair funds for her own mother home as a direct result of Hurricane “Rita” storm damages which

“Hurricane “Rita” was the fourth-most intense Atlantic hurricane ever recorded and the most intense tropical cyclone ever observed in the Gulf of Mexico, which on September 24^th 2005 the inner core and eye wall of “Hurricane Rita slams into Port Arthur, Texas

 

Which the Pro Se Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court” factual evidence during the Trial of this matter of being the direct “construction contractor” whom was contacted to fix , provide estimates of repair cost for said damaged Home located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas.

Thereafter Pro Se Plaintiff returning to his home town of “Port Arthur Texas from working “construction repairs” after massive storm damages in New Orleans LA as a result of Hurricane “Katrina”

Especially among other things fixing the (asap) needed roofing repairs of 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas which Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” refusal to comply with the terms and conditions of said

 “Insurances repair Funds” to actually fix such Hurricane damages other then Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” (RICO) scheming plans to obtain said “Insurances repair Funds” for her own personal private gains.

                                                         (4)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” the Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” herein after squandering all of the said “private insurance” Hurricane repair funds designated for damaged “property” located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas.

 

 “Lot number (10) in block number (4) of Lakeview “she” next contacting Federal  “FEMA” for needed roofing plastic covering to stop the rain water, and never fixed the damaged roof at all ever.

                                                (5)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further Before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively secretly make plans, and plotted to carry out a further

 (RICO) scheme of things against first and foremost the 58^th Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas in the scheme execution of covering up all of the Co-Defendant “Joyce M. Guy” monetary scheme made against the Hurricane repair private insurance funds designated for said damaged “property” located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas. “Lot number (10) in block number (4) of Lakeview

 

                                                (6)

Pro Se Plaintiff being further set forth Declares, Affirm, and State further before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy” and Edward McCray” collectively secretly make plans, and plotted to secondly carry out a further (RICO) fraudulent “scheme of things” against

“Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” Loan No. 5866 File No. 1219-2355082 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005

 

 Federally Declared Disaster Funding under Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program (Homeowner Assistance Program “HAP”)

 

Or (Sabine Pass Restoration Program “SPRP”) Awarding Federal Agency: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development TDHCA Federal Award Number: B-06-DG-48-0002 Federal Award Year (Year of Award from HUD to TDHCA): 2006 TDHCA Award Year: 2007 to obtain on May 28^th 2010 in excess of $54,839.31 U.S. Dollars “Construction Grant”

 

As being described in Pro Se Plaintiff exhibit (P) attached herein namely a “Mechanic’s Lien Contract” with DSW Homes 805 S. Hwy. 69, Memorial Fwy, Nederland, TX, 77267

 To repair the home located at 5050 east 7^th street in Port Arthur Texas after Private Insurances Monies already being a part of a continue (RICO) “pattern and practice squander scheme of things” committed by Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray”

 

Involving once again the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein as the Construction contractor with Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 fully in fraudulent (RICO) legal denial of ever being actually the physically acting “Attorney of record” in civil suit in common law A-180805 as a part of this cover up scheme of things

 

While all of this criminal half bake concoct (RICO) scheme of things being formed against the Pro Se Plaintiff, private insurances companies, and among others parties namely “The United States of America” for a monetary lost in excess of $54,839.31 U.S. Dollars.

                                                (7)

To add to Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray” herein combine (RICO) further fraudulent “scheme of things” in obtaining the already total of $72,500.00 U.S Dollars from namely

“Texas Department of Housing and Community affairs” Loan No. 2727 File No. 1219-2102152 CFDA 14.228 Community Development Block Grant Program (“CDBG”) Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma in the Gulf of Mexico 2005

Federally Declared Disaster Funding under Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program (Homeowner Assistance Program “HAP”)

Or (Sabine Pass Restoration Program “SPRP”) Awarding Federal Agency: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development TDHCA Federal Award Number: B-06-DG-48-0002 Federal Award Year (Year of Award from HUD to TDHCA): 2006 TDHCA Award Year: 2007

As being described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit herein (Q) Namely “Mechanic’s Lien Contract” SWMJ Construction Inc., 525 N. Sam Houston Pkwy East, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77060

For Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 and Co-Defendant(s) “Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray” herein

In a total (RICO) combine pattern and practice “scheme of things” against the “United States of America” in monetary excess gain of $127,339.31 U.S. Dollars

 

"U.S. District Court" Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 et al

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization is involved in multiple interests (financial, emotional, or otherwise), one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation of the individual or organization.

The presence of a conflict of interest is independent of the occurrence of impropriety.

Therefore, a conflict of interest can be discovered and voluntarily defused before any corruption occurs. A widely used definition is:

"A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest."

Primary interest refers to the principal goals of the profession or activity, such as the protection of clients, the health of patients, the integrity of research, and the duties of public office.

 Secondary interest includes not only financial gain but also such motives as the desire for professional advancement and the wish to do favours for family and friends,

 but conflict of interest rules usually focus on financial relationships because they are relatively more objective, fungible, and quantifiable.

 The secondary interests are not treated as wrong in themselves, but become objectionable when they are believed to have greater weight than the primary interests.

The conflict in a conflict of interest exists whether or not a particular individual is actually influenced by the secondary interest.

It exists if the circumstances are reasonably believed (on the basis of past experience and objective evidence) to create a risk that decisions may be unduly influenced by secondary interests.


Judicial disqualification, also referred to as recusal, refers to the act of abstaining from participation in an official action such as a court case/legal proceeding due to a conflict of interest of the presiding court official or administrative officer.

 Applicable statutes or canons of ethics may provide standards for recusal in a given proceeding or matter.

 Providing that the judge or presiding officer must be free from disabling conflicts of interest makes the fairness of the proceedings less likely to be questioned.

In the legal profession, the duty of loyalty owed to a client prohibits an attorney (or a law firm) from representing any other party with interests adverse to those of a current client.

The few exceptions to this rule require informed written consent from all affected clients, i.e., an "ethical wall".

In some circumstances, a conflict of interest can never be waived by a client. In perhaps the most common example encountered by the general public, the same firm should not represent both parties in a divorce or child custody matter.

 Found conflict can lead to denial or disgorgement of legal fees, or in some cases (such as the failure to make mandatory disclosure), criminal proceedings.

 In the United States, a law firm usually cannot represent a client if its interests conflict with those of another client, even if they have separate lawyers within the firm, unless (in some jurisdictions) the lawyer is segregated from the rest of the firm for the duration of the conflict.

Law firms often employ software in conjunction with their case management and accounting systems in order to meet their duties to monitor their conflict of interest exposure and to assist in obtaining waivers.

More generally, conflicts of interest can be defined as any situation in which an individual or corporation (either private or governmental) is in a position to exploit a professional or official capacity in some way for their personal or corporate benefit.

Depending upon the law or rules related to a particular organization, the existence of a conflict of interest may not, in and of itself, be evidence of wrongdoing. In fact, for many professionals, it is virtually impossible to avoid having conflicts of interest from time to time.

A conflict of interest can, however, become a legal matter, for example, when an individual tries (and/or succeeds in) influencing the outcome of a decision, for personal benefit.

A director or executive of a corporation will be subject to legal liability if a conflict of interest breaches his/her duty of loyalty.

There often is confusion over these two situations. Someone accused of a conflict of interest may deny that a conflict exists because he/she did not act improperly.

In fact, a conflict of interest can exist even if there are no improper acts as a result of it. (One way to understand this is to use the term "conflict of roles".

 A person with two roles—an individual who owns stock and is also a government official, for example—may experience situations where those two roles conflict.

The conflict can be mitigated—see below—but it still exists. In and of itself, having two roles is not illegal, but the differing roles will certainly provide an incentive for improper acts in some circumstances.)

As an example, in the sphere of business and control, according to the Institute of Internal Auditors:

Conflict of interest is a situation in which an internal auditor, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest.

Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially. A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results.

A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the internal auditor, the internal audit activity, and the profession.

A conflict of interest could impair an individual's ability to perform his or her duties and responsibilities objectively

"U.S. District Court" Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299 et al

18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code - Section 1001: Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,

knowingly and willfully - (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

        (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

       (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

   shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331),

imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591,

then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

(b) Subsection

(a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party's counsel, for statements,  representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.

     (c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to

 - (1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services,

or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or

(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.