Request
Number 115.
Admit Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at
Law”, herein and his counsel of record before responding to each and every request
for admission having fully examine the 58th
Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas Civil Action for Docket No.
A-180805
Namely all records, court documents,
and exhibit(s) in its entirety before respond to Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles
Hamilton II herein propounding party 2015 Request for Admission, Set (1)
Request
Number 116.
Admit Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at
Law”, herein and his counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission” having fully examine the 58th
Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas Civil Action for Docket No.
A-180805
Namely all records, court documents,
and exhibit(s) in its entirety before respond to Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles
Hamilton II herein propounding party 2015 Request for Admission, Set (2)
Request
Number 117.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
having fully examine each and every attached records, court documents, and
exhibit(s) filed by Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
propounding party 2015 Request for Admission, set (1) in its entirety.
Request
Number 118.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having
fully examine each and every attached records, court documents, and exhibit(s) filed
by Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein propounding party 2015 Request
for Admission, set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 119.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examine Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO)
Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341, 1343
And 1349 “Mail and Wire Fraud”, section
1028(relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification
documents),
Section 1503(relating to obstruction
of justice) as it relate in connection with the Pro
Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II, Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at
Law”, and Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein all Complaints, records, affidavits, court records, transcripts,
files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for
Admission, set (1) and Request for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 120.
Admit Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at
Law”, herein and his counsel of record before
responding to each and every “Request for Admission” Having
fully examine Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
18 U.S.C. § 1030
As it relate in
connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L.
Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s) Joyce
M. Guy and Edward McCray herein all Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally
fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request for Admission set
(2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 121.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having
fully examine Amendment VII of the United States of
America as it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles
Hamilton II, Chief Defendant Antoine L.
Freeman J. D. “Attorney
at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 122.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examine The Constitution of the State
of Texas,
Article 16: "General Provisions" Section 37 provides
for the constitutional protection of the mechanic's lien.
Section 50 provides for protection of a homestead against forced
sale to pay debts, except for foreclosure on debts related to the homestead
(mortgage, taxes, mechanic's liens, and home equity loans).
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 123.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request for Admission” Having
fully examine 18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code
- Section 1001: Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,
Knowingly and willfully - (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) Makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) Makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 124.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examine U.S. Code: Title 28:1343
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 125.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examined Texas Rules of Civil Procedures 194.2, 196, 197, and 198,
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 126.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examined Texas Rules of Civil Procedures “Subpoena”
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 127.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examined Texas Rules of Civil Procedures 10 “Withdrawal of
Attorney”
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 128.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record before responding to each and every “Request
for Admission”
Having fully examined Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, Particularly
8.04
As it relate in connection with the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, and Co-Defendant(s)
Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein
All Complaints, records,
affidavits, court records, transcripts, files and documents, described legally fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request
for Admission set (2) in its entirety.
Request
Number 129.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record that “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. is an active “Attorney” in and
for the State of Texas and this is his correct “Attorney at Law” Bar No. 24058299
in that further admitting “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. is described as a Defendant
in U.S. Cause No. 1:14-CV-592
Request
Number 130.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record that said Request for Admission, set (1) and Request for
Admission set (2) in its entirety fully free from, fraudulent, fictitious, false,
misleading material facts, in all “Subject Matter” described legally therein which
are materially pertinent to Pro Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein claims
hereto in accordance with Rule 36,
Under which rule of federal procedure
this request for admissions is made,
thereby answering all of the described legally
fully herein Request for Admission, set (1) and Request for Admission set
(2) in its entirety facts in the above-entitled and number cause, and that such
answers be sworn
to and filed promptly in the office of the District Clerk .
Request
Number 131.
Admit
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein and his
counsel of record that “Antoine L. Freeman J.D. is an active “Attorney” in and
for the State of Texas and this is his correct “Attorney at Law” Bar No. 24058299
in that further admitting
“Antoine L. Freeman J.D. is described as a
Defendant in U.S. Cause No. 1:14-CV-592 and pursuant to Request for Admission
set (two) at Request Number (127)
Said
Chief Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein after having
fully examined Texas Rules of Civil Procedures 10 “Withdrawal of Attorney”
Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein furtherance’s
admitting he was in fact “attorney of record” for Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy
and Edward McCray” collectively from the exact time frame of December 18th
2007 throughout December 11th 2009 when
“Honorable Judge Bob Wortham” of the 58th
Judicial District Court of Jefferson County Texas fully granted said Chief
Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. “Attorney at Law”, herein “Motion for “Withdrawal
of Attorney” in Docket No. A-180805 on December 11th 2009
Dated on this ______ Day of ________________
2015
By, _______________________________
Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff
P.O. Box 17524
Sugar Land Texas 77496
No comments:
Post a Comment