Thursday, June 16, 2011

Full Declaratory Judgment before the “Honorable Justice” fully being made legal entry into the records against the Defendant (The United States of America)

        325.
A Declaratory Judgment is a judgment of a court in a civil case which declares the rights, duties, or obligations of one or more parties in a dispute.
A declaratory judgment is legally binding, but it does not order any action by a party. In this way the declaratory judgment is like an action to quiet title, a paternity petition, or any other form of preventive adjudication.
 The declaratory judgment is generally distinguished from an advisory opinion because the latter does not resolve an actual case or controversy. A court may issue a declaratory judgment by itself or along with some other relief (such as an award of damages or an injunction). A declaratory judgment is sometimes called a declaratory ruling, a term which also includes decisions of regulatory agencies.
                        326.
      (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein states, assert and move very respectful before the “Honorable Justice” all causes of  action(s) being made under declaratory ruling throughout fully completely as described in the Amend Complaint to include but not limited to as follows:
                              327.
During The 1890s Defendant herein (The United States of America) launch a three pronged  attack aimed at erasing, wipe out, expunge all (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans' descendants having any “legal & Civil Fairness” in absolute participation in described defendant (America) “politics and the economy”.
                        328.
      Full Declaratory Judgment before the “Honorable Justice” fully being made legal entry into the records by a Jury herein in that the Defendant (The United States of America) (for among other things)
Willfully, intentionally and knowingly in a fiduciary capacity (The United States of America) set on, determined, resolved, conspire, plan, connive collaborate and unite with “White Supremacy”,
Being a superior race by oppression, domination and resolution against the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans blood heritage in;
1. Disenfranchisement--every southern state of the Defendant (The United States of America), between 1890 and 1905, passed laws designed specifically to prevent and target (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans from voting.
2. Defendant (The United States of America) Jim Crow Laws--In this same period, each southern state of the Defendant (The United States of America) passed laws formally segregating public facilities against the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans. It was in the 1890s that the famous "white" and "colored" signs appeared.
3. “Massive Lynching”--In this same period, a campaign of lynching re-open and began, The Co-Defendant infamous founder (President Andrew Johnson) of his Klu Klux Klan (KKK) paramilitary killer bandits
“Restarted targeting” and providing massive premature “wrongful deaths” and destruction, inflicting cruel combine continue application plan into furtherance’s “genocide statehood death toll upon all (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American (race) “men” descendants “especially”.
                              329.
Declaratory Judgment Vote Disfranchisement against (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans descendants
In the 1890s, each southern state of the Defendant (The United States of America) passed constitutional amendments placing stipulations on voting that hit (Negro) Plaintiff Black African Americans descendants hardest. There were three main ways Defendant (The United States of America) scheme in doing this: “poll taxes, property tests and literacy tests.
Property tests made it illegal to vote unless you owned property. The poll tax simply put a tax on voting. Poll taxes, clearly had a discouraging effect on voting by poor (Negro) people
 Brings respectful to mind before the “Honorable Justice” taking complete judicial notice to factors
 In the vote scrubbing of 87,000 (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans voters in Florida that enabled George W. Bush to “steal” the 2000 election.

No comments:

Post a Comment