340.
Preponderance of the evidence n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the Trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence.
Thus, one clearly knowledgeable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a dozen witnesses with hazy testimony, or a signed agreement with definite terms may outweigh opinions or speculation about what the parties intended.
Preponderance of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is the more severe test of evidence required to convict in a criminal trial. No matter what the definition stated in various legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective.
341.
All (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American here respectfully moves before the “Honorable Court” by all of the Preponderance of the evidence being Presented herein to be that said described defendant (American) “History” as outline the very moment in time to the present undersigned “Date of 2011”
described “Hostile”, “Oppression”, “Genocide Statehood” application by Defendant (The United States of America) plan, blueprint, enrollment with “White Supremacy” and their “Main” Co- Agents, Confederates Bad Ass Actor(s) Klu Klux Klan (KKK) warranting full declaratory judgment as described to include but not limited to
342.
Co-Defendant (President Andrew Johnson) conviction under the Preponderance of the evidence to wit: Conspire, with intent, having full knowledge, information, familiarity, and expertise in the Actual “Attempted Assassination” and the “Death of The President of the Defendant (The United State of America)
President Abraham Lincoln for control of all Negro Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans descendant(s) herein and latter the full introduction, enforcement(s) By: Defendant (The United States of America) “Black Codes” Laws.
343.
Defendant (The United States of America) “History” alleges as follows:
John Wilkes Booth, had assigned George Atzerodt to alleges kill Co-Defendant “Vice President Andrew Johnson,” who was staying at the Kirkwood Hotel in Washington. Atzerodt was to go to the Vice President's room at 10:15 p.m. and shoot him.[46] On April 14, Atzerodt rented room 126 at the Kirkwood, directly above the room where Johnson was staying.
344.
He arrived at the Kirkwood at the appointed time and went to the bar downstairs. He was carrying a gun and a knife. Atzerodt asked the bartender, Michael Henry, about the Vice President's character and behavior. After spending some time at the hotel saloon, Atzerodt got drunk and wandered away down the streets of Washington. Nervous, he tossed his knife away in the street. He made his way to the Pennsylvania House Hotel by 2 a.m., where he checked into a room and went to sleep.
345.
Earlier that day, Booth stopped by the Kirkwood Hotel and left a note for Johnson that read, "I don't wish to disturb you. Are you at home? J. Wilkes Booth."
The card was picked up that night by Johnson's personal secretary, William Browning.
This message has been interpreted in many different ways throughout the years.
One theory is that Booth, afraid that Atzerodt would not succeed in killing Johnson, or worried that Atzerodt would not have the courage to carry out the assassination, tried to use the message to implicate Johnson in the conspiracy.
Another theory is that Booth was actually trying to contact Browning in order to find out whether or not Johnson was expected to be at home in the Kirkwood that night.
346.
However” The (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Preponderance of the evidence against the Co-Defendant President Andrew Johnson as Follows:
1.
No comments:
Post a Comment