(138)
Pro Se Plaintiff declares, affirm, and state further before the “Honorable Justice” The Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) herein
continue on with forward progress in a “Rouge” Attorney at Law fraudulent “scheme of things” while Co-Defendants
“Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein prosperity (RICO)” enterprise of monetary scheme of things” continue actual $76,000.00 U.S. Dollars dividends increase
with the Pro Se Plaintiff being a unwilling party to “actual theft of his “personal property” Namely Pro Se Plaintiff herein “Construction Company Entire Tools”,
Now being a party of the Co-Defendants “Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray collection of (RICO) enterprise monetary increase “scheme of things” since 1997
The Co-Defendants “Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray (RICO) mutable business “past, present, to include but not limited to all current criminal fraudulent doings in a ongoing “civil suit” no less to
Acquiring actual in excess of $76,000.00 U.S. Dollars as being described in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (C) herein “Jefferson County Texas Search Index”
As Pro Se Plaintiff furtherance support this proof before the “Honorable Justice” with Attached exhibit (N) herein namely
* Discovery Request Document of Pro Se Plaintiff request respond to Interrogatories Question at:
No. 10
Where is the funding coming from the new home?
Answer: Federal Grant
No. 11
What are the term and conditions of any contract in regards to the new home?
Answer: Federal Government built home free of charge Co-Defendant must remain in home for at least 3 years.
No. 12
What is the entire cost of the construction for the new home?
Answer: $76,000
No. 13 How is the City of Port Arthur Involved?
Answer: Not involved
No. 14
How is the state of Texas Involved?
Answer: Not involved
No. 15
How is the federal government involved?
Answer: Federal Grant
No. 16How much money did the Co-defendants actually paid for in the new home construction
Answer: No money paid by Co-defendants (Joyce M. Guy & Edward McCray)
(139)
Pro Se Plaintiff declares, affirm, and state further before the “Honorable Justice”
Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (N) herein Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) collective respond to the
“First Set of Interrogatories” of Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein provides a
“sound (RICO) proof” of a past present and future fraudulent intent “scheme of things” before the “Honorable Justice” for a monetary value.
To include but not limited to Defendant Antoine L. Freeman J. D. (Attorney at Law) Texas Bar No. 24058299
(RICO) Intent at further fraudulent instrument namely said exhibit (N) herein Namely
* Discovery Request Document of Pro Se Plaintiff requesting respond to Interrogatories Question(s).
(140)
Pro Se Plaintiff Quite Elementary “Logically”, affirming, and state further before the “Honorable Justice”
sound proof in Pro Se Plaintiff attach exhibit (C) herein “Jefferson County Texas” search index physically identifying among other things “Transfer of dwelling
(141)
(Block 172 Lot 1-2) that is a party of the State Court civil action (A-180805) transfer to the
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs” on June 18th 2009 Instrument # 2009022762
(142)
With Instrument # 2009022763 being a “Fraudulent” financing statement also filed June 18th 2009 with
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs”
(143)
With Instrument # 2013023794 being a (release) being with
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs” on July 22nd 2013
(144)
With Instrument # 2013023857 being a (termination) being with
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs” on July 22nd 2013
(145)
Defendant and Co Defendant(s) collective (RICO) accomplishment “scheme of things” being legally in the future of the civil suit of (2007)
fully secure in the free and clear property “Deed” to the Co-Defendant(s) Joyce M. Guy and Edward McCray herein from the
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs” being about a future (RICO) executed “scheme of things”
on April 22nd 2014 as described in Instrument # 2014012455
(146)
As this civil suit (A-180805) for a “Breach of Construction Contract”, “theft of personal Property” namely
said entire “Construction Company tools”.
Commenced in November 26th 2007 as being “legally” described before the “Honorable Justice”
in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (E) herein
“The Jefferson County Texas 58th Judicial District Court “Case Ledger” A-180805
(147)
Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) collectively (RICO) Providing false and misleading “statements,
events and factual circumstances surround the actual proper disposition of
$76,000 “U.S. Government Grant” and the conflicting real interest with the “State of Texas”
(148)
Just whom being (RICO) pilferage out of the $76,000.000 U.S. Dollars Housing Grant..?
By the Defendant (Attorney at Law) and Co-Defendant(s) collectively herein
(149)
Is it the “States of Texas vs. “United States of America” $76,000.000 U.S. Dollars Housing Grant ..?
“Your “Honorable Justice”..?
(150)
As Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II smartly presenting attached exhibit (C)
being “Jefferson County Texas search Index
Describing among other things a $76,000.000 U.S. Dollars Housing Grant
and its involving of the dwelling (448 DeQueen Jefferson County Texas) with the financial involvement with the “States of Texas” quite (clearly)
(151)
But quite scary conflicting concealment bogus facts is (clearly) contained in Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (N) herein
Namely * Discovery Request Document of Pro Se Plaintiff request respond to Interrogatories Question
at number: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 15, and 16 being quite contradicting conflicting fraudulent response describing a Interrogatories Question at:
No. 10
Where is the funding coming from the new home?
Answer: Federal Grant
No. 11
What are the term and conditions of any contract in regards to the new home?
Answer: Federal Government built home free of charge Co-Defendant must remain in home for at least 3 years.
No. 12
What is the entire cost of the construction for the new home?
Answer: $76,000
No. 13 How is the City of Port Arthur Involved?
Answer: Not involved
No. 14
How is the state of Texas Involved?
Answer: Not involved
No. 15
How is the federal government involved?
Answer: Federal Grant
(152)
In comparison to Pro Se Plaintiff attached exhibit (C) describing in “confusing details” now that can it be the $76,000 U.S. Dollars Home Grant funding belongs too?
(153)
Meanwhile factually (Block 172 Lot 1-2) the dwelling that is a party of the State Court civil action (A-180805) since November 26th 2007
was “indeed legally transfer” to the “Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs”
on June 18th 2009 Instrument # 2009022762 standing as sound proof of that
(154)
With Instrument # 2009022763 being a “Fraudulent” financing statement also filed June 18th 2009 with
“Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs” standing as sound proof of that
(155)
With Instrument # 2013023794 being a (release) being with “Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs”
on July 22nd 2013 standing as sound proof of that
(156)
With Instrument # 2013023857 being a (termination) being with “Texas Department of Housing & Community affairs”
on July 22nd 2013 standing as sound proof of that
and the 58th Judicial District Civil Court of Jefferson County Texas ongoing affairs surround the dwelling located at
(Block 172 Lot 1-2) 448 DeQueen Blvd. in Port Arthur Texas being a Party to a past, present and future (RICO) enterprise.
No comments:
Post a Comment