(40)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and
Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” this
“International RICO Cartel Enterprise Racket”, scheme of things in conspire to defraud
“United States” upon information and belief Chief
Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et
al and
Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal
Division” et al”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC, Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA
International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare “International RICO
Cartel”,
Having furtherance devised a formulation,
structure, monetary laundering (RICO) system within the Co-Plaintiff(s) United
States of America” et al Jurisdiction in that as follows:
1.
The exact same address of (616) Bourne Ct. Danville CA. 94506 to a home which was sold on
January 2006 for $1,075,000.00 but said check for “Construction services” was
made out on August 22nd 2015..And the Personal Check filed as Pro
Se Plaintiff, “Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of
America” et al, and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas” et al, herein exhibit (B) in
support of this complaint made herein
2.
And Said Personal check of Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein issued from
“Citibank” which was Drawn on the exact same address of 156 Coburn Road Pennington, NJ 08534 to a home
which was sold on “April 19th, 2013 for $365,000.00 U.S. Dollars
“However” but said check for “Construction services” was made out on August 22th
2015…
3.
$1,075,000.00 +$365,000.00 =
$1.44 (Million) U.S. Dollars in a “International RICO Cartel”, property scam (among others) in which said Chief Defendant “Doctor
Dinesh Chandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s)
“Geeta International “Legal Division” et al”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC,
Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA International Co. Ltd.” and Co-Defendant(s) Vipul Khare
“International RICO Cartel”, racket herein having “Sold said property “among
others” to include but not limited to none other collectively “themselves” in
this (RICO) racket to furtherance’s commit fraud of the Co-Plaintiff “The
United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al in the
past, present and future obscuring, hiding, laundering such a well integrated
conglomerate of “International Business in its own tax free have zone hidden
well within Co-Plaintiff (United States of America) scheme of things being
namely a International Corporation of mutable business legal as such however well
as facts proving herein a turn into a well formulated “International RICO Enterprise Racket” based
in “Thailand”
4.
Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, Co-Defendant(s)
Geeta International et al and Co-Defendant(s) “Geeta International “Legal
Division” et al”, Co-Defendant(s) Geeta Group LLC,
(40)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and
Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” in that Namely
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein having “Possibly”
to aid furtherance’s a international (RICO) scheme of things against the Pro Plaintiff
“Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of America” et al,
And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas” et al to include the “State of California and The State of “New York”…among
others, in false impersonation as a License (Doctor) within the Jurisdiction of
Co-Plaintiff “United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas”
in direct violation of TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052: Texas Statutes - Section 164.052: as described in paragraph
TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052 : Texas Statutes - Section 164.052:
PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSE APPLICANT (a) A physician or an
applicant for a license to practice medicine commits a prohibited practice if
that person:(1) submits to the board a false or misleading statement, document,
or certificate in an application for a license;(2) presents to the board a
license, certificate, or diploma that was illegally or fraudulently
obtained;(3) commits fraud or deception in taking or passing an examination;(4)
uses alcohol or drugs in an intemperate manner that, in the board's opinion,
could endanger a patient's life;(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable
conduct that is likely to deceive or defraud the public, as provided by Section
164.053,
Or injure the public;(6)
uses an advertising statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive;(7)
advertises professional superiority or the performance of professional service
in a superior manner if that advertising is not readily subject to verification;(8)
purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers to purchase, sell, barter, or
use, a medical degree, license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a
license, certificate, or diploma in or incident to an application to the board
for a license to practice medicine;(9) alters, with fraudulent intent, a
medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license,
certificate, or diploma;(10) uses a medical license, certificate, or diploma,
or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma that has been:(A)
fraudulently purchased or issued;(B) counterfeited; or(C) materially
altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another person in an examination
required by this subtitle for a medical license;(12) engages in conduct that
subverts or attempts to subvert an examination process required by this
subtitle for a medical license;(13) impersonates a physician or permits another
to use the person's license or certificate to practice medicine in this
state;(14) directly or indirectly employs a person whose license to practice
medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates in the
practice of medicine with a person:(A) whose license to practice medicine has
been suspended, canceled, or revoked; or(B) who has been convicted of the
unlawful practice of medicine in this state or elsewhere;
(16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in
the procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts to perform or procure a criminal
abortion, or attempts to aid or abet the performance or procurement of a
criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of
medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporation that is not
licensed to practice medicine by the board;(18) performs an abortion on a woman
who is pregnant with a viable unborn child during the third trimester of the
pregnancy unless:
(A) the abortion is necessary to prevent the death of the
woman;(B) the viable unborn child has a severe, irreversible brain impairment;
or(C) the woman is diagnosed with a significant likelihood of suffering
imminent severe, irreversible brain damage or imminent severe, irreversible
paralysis; or(19) performs an abortion on an unemancipated minor without the
written consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian
or without a court order, as provided by Section 33.003 or 33.004,
Family Code, authorizing
the minor to consent to the abortion, unless the physician concludes that on
the basis of the physician's good faith clinical judgment, a condition exists
that complicates the medical condition of the pregnant minor and necessitates
the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avoid a
serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function and that
there is insufficient time to obtain the consent of the child's parent,
managing conservator, or legal guardian.(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(12),
conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert the medical licensing examination
process includes, as prescribed by board rules, conduct that violates:(1) the
security of the examination materials;(2) the standard of test administration;
or(3) the accreditation process.(c) The board shall adopt the forms necessary
for physicians to obtain the consent required for an abortion to be performed
on an unemancipated minor under Subsection (a). The form executed to obtain
consent or any other required documentation must be retained by the physician
until the later of the fifth anniversary of the date of the minor's majority or
the seventh anniversary of the date the physician received or created the
documentation for the record.
(41)
” In Direction violation of
California Penal Code 529 PC
“False impersonation” (also
known as “false personation”) is a crime in California. Under California Penal
Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false impersonation when you:
1.
Falsely
personate someone (that is, pretend to be them) in their public or private
capacity; and
2.
Perform any
other act that might cause the person you are impersonating to become liable to
a lawsuit or prosecution or become obligated to pay money, or which might cause
you to get some benefit from impersonating him/her.
(42)
In Direction violation of New
York Penal Code.
Penal
§ 190.25 Criminal impersonation in the second
degree.
A person is guilty of criminal
impersonation in the second degree when
he:
1. Impersonates another and does an act in
such assumed character with
intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or
defraud another; or
2.
Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and
does an act in such pretended capacity with
intent to obtain a benefit
or to injure or defraud another; or
3.
(a) Pretends to be a public
servant, or wears or displays without
authority any uniform, badge, insignia
or facsimile thereof
by which
such
public servant is lawfully
distinguished, or falsely expresses by
his words or actions that he is a public
servant or is
acting with
approval
or authority of a public agency or department; and (b) so acts
with intent to induce another to
submit to such
pretended official
authority,
to solicit funds
or to otherwise cause another to
act in
reliance upon that pretense.
4. Impersonates another
by communication by
internet website or
electronic
means with intent to obtain a benefit or injure or
defraud
another, or by such communication pretends to
be a
public servant in
order
to induce another to submit to
such authority or act in reliance
on such pretense.
Criminal impersonation in the second degree
is a class A misdemeanor.
(43)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al herein
on the Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of
Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before
the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant
Dr. Dinesh Chandra Khare is
a Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine ... Hind Institute of
Medical Sciences of Professors and Faculty, Associate Professor, Department of
General Medicine
Hind Institute of
Medical Sciences is a private medical college and hospital located near Lucknow city in Barabanki district, Uttar
Pradesh, India
(44)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al, Co-Plaintiff(s)
“State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and
Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, having no
legal medical (MD) standing within the Jurisdiction of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “United
States of America” et al, and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al while committed
to “Medical Battery” of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein
as described in this complaint.
No comments:
Post a Comment