Plaintiff exhibit (I) *Response to Court Order* document produced by both Co-Defendant(s) (Walter and Rosemary Dennis) herein and filed in the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on April 12th 2010
Stating fully and very clearly herein for the “legal effect” of the Fifth Circuit Honorable Justices Court of Appeals and declaring before the Honorable Undersigned “Honorable Magistrate Judge:
“Defendants” (Walter and Rosemary Dennis) “have no knowledge of the Law” and “hired” Attorney (Willie Zanders) for representation in this matter.
The Defendants were under the impression that (Zanders) would enroll and respond to this matter. A copy of the contract and receipt of payment for his attorney fee is attached.
The Plaintiff requested complete copies of all Defendants’ banking records. There are concerns about releasing some of the requested information, such as banking statement throughout the dates of August 28th, 2005 to August 28th 2009. The Defendants are withholding these statements at this time as this information is “too sensitive”
(Among other legal details) dated 12th day of April, 2010.
Containing Signature of both Co-Defendant (Walter and Rosemary Dennis)
Plaintiff exhibit (H) Pro Se Defendants motion to enroll counsel Willie M. Zanders, Sr. (LSBA No.13778) filed in Louisiana Eastern District Court on Jun 7th -2010
“However” Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein having actual physical documents” namely exhibit (G) and (H) clearly by Defendant (Zanders) herein “own admission” his “own signature” and his admission of accepting monetary funding for said legal services stating clearly back on May 12th 2007 his (Zanders) full acknowledgment of his legal representation as to being in the full capacity of a license legal counsel Attorney at Law
For the full behalf and legal interest of Co-Defendant (Dennis et al) herein an actual (USDA) Federal civil suit against Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) as described in Plaintiff exhibit (A), (B), (C), (D), (E) and (F)
Whereas” Co-Defendant (Dennis et al) herein filing supposedly Pro Se Professional (A-1 Class Attorney Documents) before a “Honorable Court” of Law with Co-Defendants (Dennis et al) herein very own Admission herein in Plaintiff (Hamilton II) exhibit (I)
Co-Defendant (Dennis et al) of having no knowledge at all of the Law to appear before any of the Honorable Court(s) especially filing the very Professional Attorney Work Product as giving a full picture before the “Honorable Court” by Plaintiff (Hamilton II) exhibit (A) and (B) (Two) motion to dismiss complaint filed in Texas and Louisiana Federal U.S. Court System while Supposedly (Walter and Rosemary Dennis) portray and appearing Pro Se
Both Co-Defendant (Dennis et al) did in fact use these legal documents, in addition, (Zanders, Walter and Rosemary Dennis) committing to among other things the complete destruction and alter of much other physical evidence during the presences before an “Honorable United States Federal Court of Law” in Texas and Louisiana to defeat the Pro Se Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II)
Plaintiff state, assert very respectful before the “Honorable Court” full with contain actual evidence produced herein that “Willie M. Zanders” an legal Attorney at Law (LSBA No.13778) herein did in all “facts and circumstances” received $2,500 dollars
For such “Pro Se Rouge masquerade Legal Attorney work product services” in the complete money (RICO) “Mail and Wire Fraud, Money laundry, destruction, and alter of much other physical evidence during the presences before an “Honorable United States Federal Court of Law” in Texas and Louisiana. In direct violation against the Plaintiff Civil Rights to suit in common Law among other things further violation of:
Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(4) which states that "[a] lawyer shall not: (4) engage in conduct involving dishonesty", fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation."
No comments:
Post a Comment