Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition)


       XXXVII
                              “Violation of America with Disabilities Act of 1990”

Deepest Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al herein and The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a law that was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1990.

In 1986, the National Council on Disability had recommended enactment of an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and drafted the first version of the bill which was introduced in the House and Senate in 1988.

It was signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President George H. W. Bush, amended and signed by President George W. Bush with changes effective January 1, 2009.
The ADA is a wide-ranging civil rights law that is intended to protect against discrimination based on disability.

It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Upon which  We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race, affirm, state and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully cause of action as follows:

Pro Se “Slave Negro” (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, pursuant to forever more “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

Deepest Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al 1000% (RICO) Judicial Fraud proving in Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884

(Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, having no legal standing ever and still a “Slave” and having ever no legal citizenship in “United States of America”, upon which precisely at the

09:15 AM hour by Telephone “United States of America” “United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, “Houston Division” a/k/a “Judge Kenneth Hoyt” corrupted in 1000% “Judicial Fraud” and super

 “White Only” constitution of (America) “brass blue balls”, asking Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, having he taking his “Medications”…?

 While said Federal complaint on file and before said “United States of America” Judge Kenneth Hoyt at the February 15th, 2016 AM hour claiming among other things,

Being criminally assaulted by Chief Defendant Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein being first and foremost committing  

Hostile “Medical Battery”, tactics against the Pro Se Plaintiff “Will, Civil rights, Peace and Dignity, and mental well being..! 

Notwithstanding the noted legal facts Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein is physically a “Permanently Disable Veteran” protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; 

 And (RICO) enterprise stolen my Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein (American) issued “Social Security Number” and all Construction employees Business information in a grand (RICO) scheme of things legally

As described in complaint on file and now on appeal


Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR DINESH CHANDRA KHARE

Case Number:
15-20612
Filed:
October 23, 2015

Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Nature of Suit:
RICO

Hamilton v. Khare

as 4:2015cv02884

Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II

Defendant: Dinesh Chandra Khare

Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Southern District Court

Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

 
(33)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the Honorable U.S. Justice In a half bake (RICO) combine “greedy racket enterprise” in association with


“18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, “scheme of things” that has accumulated gradually past acquisition of a simple “Fraud and Breach of Construction Contract” in common laws within the State of Texas in that “
Chief Defendant Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein being first and foremost “front man” between the exact dates of June 25th 2015 and July 6th 7:20 pm 2015 first approached (Pro Se Plaintiff) herein on behalf of himself and all the described

Co-Defendant(s) in paragraph (9-14) above collectively herein
 “Enterprise Racket” complained of in conspiracy, connivance, complicity, plotting, secret understanding, scheming against the Pro Se Plaintiff herein “Will, Civil Rights, Peace and Dignity, and well being..!

(34)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the Honorable U.S. Justice Chief Defendant
“Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein Abuse his Position of Trust and indeed Usage of “Special Skill” namely as being a (Doctor) committed to include

 Hostile “Medical Battery”, tactics against the Pro Se Plaintiff “Will, Civil rights, Peace and Dignity, and mental well being..! 

Notwithstanding the noted legal facts Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II herein is physically a Permanently Disable Veteran protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; 

Which Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein Abuse his Position of Trust and indeed Usage of “Special Skill” to conspire against Permanently Disable Veteran protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; 

As a tool to gain advantages over a Construction Contract with the Pro Se Plaintiff  herein at setting a low price on new home construction per sq. ft.
In that Doctor Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, first step committed to submitting

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein to a unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation” over a period of several claim business meeting  dinners in Montgomery Texas between the dates of “June 25th 2015 And August 20th 2015 

Pro Se Plaintiff further state, declare and affirm in fact did notice at this time frame “short hand medical notes” being scribble down by Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” herein as he attempted secretly entertaining and engaging in “Medical Battery”

Against the Pro Se Plaintiff in a range of off handed particularized competency determinations questions, concerning,
Depression,  Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Competency, Violence risk assessment, Mental Disability,

 Forensic psychology personality disorder, Bipolar, psychopath and Sociopath evaluations of the Pro Se Plaintiff to include question of the Pro se Plaintiff personal life, family and current economic conditions.

(35)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein then after obtaining the unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation” on the Pro Se Plaintiff further commenced

On the 26th day of August 2015 from the time frame of 1:20 pm to 4:45 pm engage in hostile obnoxious fashion of “Harassment” and Aggressive pressure of force, half truth , direct lies, coercion; in a
 
“Public Nuisance”, setting at the
“Panda Food Restaurant” off FM 1960 in Montgomery Texas in An act, condition, to cause Pro Se Plaintiff, shame, humiliation, awkwardness, confusion, hostility and anger from a Professional (Doctor) advantages already gain in this unwanted 

“Forensic Mental Evaluation” now being used as a tool to elicit shame, humiliation, awkwardness, confusion, hostility and anger for collusion advantages of a “Breach of Construction Contract”
 in possible attempts committed by Pro Se Plaintiff expressing “among other things” hostility and anger possibly violence directed at

Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, in this Public disgrace shame to gain advantages over Pro se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein to make void Relationship between Pro Se Plaintiff and at Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”,

 In concert, collusion, conspirer and present witness by Co Defendant(s)  Greg Miller, Co-Defendant, “Trillionaire Realty”, and Co-Defendant “Trillionaire Assets” set up of a hostile “Public Nuisance”, and
 
“Harassment” setting at the “Panda Food Restaurant” off 1960 in Montgomery Texas base upon said “Medical Battery” of an unwanted  “Forensic Mental Evaluation” conducted by Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”.

(36)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further “Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”  in that Now Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein engage in the usage (twice) of the obtained unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation” on the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II”

Now all of which has become as a “Hostile Medical Battery Tool” further against the Pro Se Plaintiff in public setting no less at “Panda Food Restaurant” off 1960 in Montgomery obnoxious fashion of
 
“Harassment” and Aggressive pressure of force, half truth , direct lies, coercion; in hopes (Pro Se Plaintiff) to display acts of rage, disturbance and (Violence) in order that

Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” herein furtherance’s continue to obtain an advantage for a (Now) needed (ASAP)
 “Breach of Construction contract” in favor of Defendant and Co-Defendant(s) collectively to cover up Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA Group LLC,” Vipul Khare, “John Doe (Attorney at Law)”,  

“Greg Miller”, Trillionaire Realty et al”, and “Trillionaire Assets et al”, collectively involved Fraud in the same Civil Conspirer, “ Tortious Interference with Existing Contract”,
Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of Special Skill”, “Medical Battery”, “Harassment”, “Public Nuisance”, “Obstruction of Justice”,  “18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”
 Deceptive Trade Practices Acts, Brought in conjunction with “Common law” Fraud and Breach of Contract, “Abuse of Position of Trust” or “Use of Special Skill”,
“Common law Fraud”, “Intent Gross Negligence”, “Slander”, “Breach of Fiduciary Duty”, “False Promise of Future Performance”, Detrimental reliance’s”, aiding and abetting 

And “Intentional infliction of emotional distress” scheme of things in Concert, collusion and hostile actions with Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”. 


(37)

 Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further “Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”  not even being his “mental patient” of Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, whom engage in all of this “Medical Battery” deceitfulness, trickery, deviousness and Fraud dealing as first a introduction
To aid and advance a fraudulent pretenses, representations, scheme and promises of Pro Se Plaintiff herein involved in future building of (5) New Home Construction in Montgomery Texas under which 

           Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” enhancement a barging plan which a construction business  negations did in fact assumed and was reached transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of phone communications, including “Internet wire” (emails) and Phone Message wire Communication (IM)
Between

 Pro Se Plaintiff and Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” being the front man under this disguise for future promise in obtaining a money price fixing set up scheme of things at $48 U.S. Dollars per Sq. ft. on properties located in Montgomery County Texas area with the first Project being located at 3429 Nottingham Ln in Montgomery, Texas 77356.
To which now Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further “Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief Defendant
“Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” usage such “Medical Battery” with a total disregard for his profession as an attempted business “exit strategy” at the expensive of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” Peace, will, dignity, Civil rights and “mental well being”.

(40)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” in that

Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein having “Possibly” to aid furtherance’s a international (RICO) scheme of things against the Pro Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) United States of America” et al,

And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al to include the “State of California and The State of “New York”…among others, in false impersonation as a License (Doctor) within the Jurisdiction of Co-Plaintiff “United States of America” et al and

Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas” in direct violation of TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052: Texas Statutes - Section 164.052: as described in paragraph
TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052 : Texas Statutes - Section 164.052:

 PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSE APPLICANT (a) A physician or an applicant for a license to practice medicine commits a prohibited practice if that person:(1) submits to the board a false or misleading statement, document, or certificate in an application for a license;

(2) presents to the board a license, certificate, or diploma that was illegally or fraudulently obtained;(3) commits fraud or deception in taking or passing an examination;(4) uses alcohol or drugs in an intemperate manner that, in the board's opinion, could endanger a patient's life;

(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable conduct that is likely to deceive or defraud the public, as provided by Section 164.053,
 Or injure the public;(6) uses an advertising statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive;(7) advertises professional superiority or the performance of professional service in a superior manner if that advertising is not readily subject to verification;

(8) purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers to purchase, sell, barter, or use, a medical degree, license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a license, certificate, or diploma in or incident to an application to the board for a license to practice medicine;(9) alters, with fraudulent intent, a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma;

(10) uses a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma that has been:(A) fraudulently purchased or issued;(B) counterfeited; or(C) materially altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another person in an examination required by this subtitle for a medical license;

(12) engages in conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert an examination process required by this subtitle for a medical license;(13) impersonates a physician or permits another to use the person's license or certificate to practice medicine in this state;

(14) directly or indirectly employs a person whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates in the practice of medicine with a person:(A) whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked; or(B) who has been convicted of the unlawful practice of medicine in this state or elsewhere;

(16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in the procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts to perform or procure a criminal abortion, or attempts to aid or abet the performance or procurement of a criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporation that is not licensed to practice medicine by the board;

(18) performs an abortion on a woman who is pregnant with a viable unborn child during the third trimester of the pregnancy unless:
(A) the abortion is necessary to prevent the death of the woman;(B) the viable unborn child has a severe, irreversible brain impairment; or

(C) the woman is diagnosed with a significant likelihood of suffering imminent severe, irreversible brain damage or imminent severe, irreversible paralysis; or(19) performs an abortion on an unemancipated minor without the written consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian or without a court order, as provided by Section 33.003 or 33.004,
 Family Code, authorizing the minor to consent to the abortion, unless the physician concludes that on the basis of the physician's good faith clinical judgment, a condition exists that complicates the medical condition of the pregnant minor and necessitates the
immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avoid a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function and that there is insufficient time to obtain the consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian.

(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(12), conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert the medical licensing examination process includes, as prescribed by board rules, conduct that violates:(1) the security of the examination materials;(2) the standard of test administration; or

(3) the accreditation process.(c) The board shall adopt the forms necessary for physicians to obtain the consent required for an abortion to be performed on an unemancipated minor under Subsection (a). The form executed to obtain consent or any other required documentation must be retained by the physician until the later of the fifth anniversary of the date of the minor's majority or the seventh anniversary of the date the physician received or created the documentation for the record.
    (41)

” In Direction violation of California Penal Code 529 PC
 “False impersonation” (also known as “false personation”) is a crime in California. Under California Penal Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false impersonation when you:


1. Falsely personate someone (that is, pretend to be them) in their public or private capacity; and
2. Perform any other act that might cause the person you are impersonating to become liable to a lawsuit or prosecution or become obligated to pay money, or which might cause you to get some benefit from impersonating him/her.

(42)
In Direction violation of New York Penal Code.
Penal

  § 190.25 Criminal impersonation in the second degree.
    A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the second degree when
  he:
    1. Impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with
  intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; or

    2.  Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and
  does an act in such pretended capacity with intent to obtain  a  benefit
  or to injure or defraud another; or

    3.  (a)  Pretends to be a public servant, or wears or displays without
  authority any uniform, badge, insignia or  facsimile  thereof  by  which
  such  public  servant is lawfully distinguished, or falsely expresses by
  his words or actions that he is a  public  servant  or  is  acting  with
  approval  or authority of a public agency or department; and

(b) so acts
  with intent to induce another  to  submit  to  such  pretended  official
  authority,  to  solicit  funds  or  to otherwise cause another to act in
  reliance upon that pretense.

    4. Impersonates  another  by  communication  by  internet  website  or
  electronic  means  with  intent to obtain a benefit or injure or defraud
  another, or by such communication pretends to be  a  public  servant  in
  order  to  induce another to submit to such authority or act in reliance
  on such pretense.
    Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
  (43)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al herein on the Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”

 Chief Defendant Dr. Dinesh Chandra Khare is a Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine ...
 
Hind Institute of Medical Sciences of Professors and Faculty, Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine
Hind Institute of Medical Sciences is a private medical college and hospital located near Lucknow city in Barabanki district, Uttar Pradesh, India

    (44)

Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al, Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”

Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, having no legal medical (MD) standing within the Jurisdiction of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States of America” et al, and
 
Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al while committed to “Medical Battery” of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein as described in this complaint.


 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)