XXV
“Theft of Property”
We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race 2015-2099, “Affirm”, “State”, and
“declare” legally,
Appearance Respectfully before his/her “World Honorable Presiding
“Justices”, To the Honorable “World Court of Justice” The Hague
Upon which We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race, affirm,
state and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, fully cause of action as follows:
(Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein “Pursuant
to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
Making for exactly (156) exact “ungodly
corrupted judicial racial bias years of being denied legal (Negro) race status
standing to proceed before any
Federal
Court of Laws, on laws “Dealing” with among required judicial duties of the
Deep Dark Ages Defendant in coming about
Fair
play in “equity”, concerning (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),
being abducted, there after the filing of this civil action, against Thee
“Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law
And falsely in 2011 “Criminally Imprisonment
for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) upon which the Deep Dark ages
Defendant “United States of America” (Houston Division) ,
State of Texas, Harris County, Houston Mayor
Annise D. Parker City of Houston”, and City of Houston Texas (Police Dept.)
Property Division 1202 Washington Ave. Houston Texas
Upon (RICO)
enterprise “Criminal” finally releasing (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN), Criminal engage further in the absolute 100,000% Grand Theft of (Petitioner)
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing
In American civil procedure, the 100% work-product
doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S.
Docket Number
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
decisions or orders for this case
Filed: December 15, 2010 as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: United States of America, Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern
District Court
Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations
Filed: April 17, 2012 as 12-40403
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON,
II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of all other African American
(Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President, RUTHERFORD B. HAYES
Court: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Criminal engage furtherance’s in the absolute
Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer”
containing
In American civil procedure, the 100%
work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation
of U.S. Docket Number
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR,
MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G. JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R. TREJO,
SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY, CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND, MIKE
COX'S BAIL SVC,
LACEY'S
DELI, JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK THERING,
RING INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL, DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-GARCIA,
MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F. M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA MARTINEZ and
ALLEN J. GUIDRY
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: RICO
The official deposition of Thee “Infamous”
Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, further all
legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer bag,
And the VIP “Theft of Personal Property of “Deposition
of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
which do exist as
“We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…
“World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition) file to “World Honorable
Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague exhibit (A)
“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) dated
August 15th 2011, whom pursuant to Civil No. 4:10-CV-2709, “The
Vickery Law Firm” provided the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein legal deposition upon which said legal deposition being stolen from me (Petitioner)
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) in 2011
“The Vickery
Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry
C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, all of which
“Proclaim” as this very undersigned “Notary
Seal Date” being official in the Year of 2015 of the Lord,
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S.
393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein being kidnapped
in 2011, and theft of his property, all to protect Houston Scrooge Attorney
“Harry
C. Arthur Esq.” and His (RICO) scheme of things involving a Downtown (CBD) building
belong to the “official” site of “President the “Sam Houston” of the Republic
of Texas…..
Upon which as of this undersigned notary
sealed date (Building) just sit there in years of “Decay” as all parties
involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church Cathedral” ,A Homeless soup
kitchen for $250,000 U.S. Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of thing to erect a
$20s plus (Millions) newer building,
Upon which Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after released from “false Imprisonment”,
thereafter 2011
The (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein having no legal standing in 2011- 2099 to appear before a Federal
Court of Law, in this “White Only”, never ending (RICO) enterprise ongoing “Slave Régime”
2015-2099, direct at the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
said “Personal Property”
No comments:
Post a Comment