26.
Respectfully “Required” furtherance’s appearances
Defendant (USA) To: His/her Honorable “World Court of Justices” legally as
follows:
Production of all Documents “The Defendant the
“United States of America” et al “herein relating to certified copy of the
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975),
Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (1975)
- Syllabus
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
Faretta v. California
No. 73-5772
Argued November 19, 1974
Decided June 30, 1975
422 U.S. 806
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
Syllabus
The Sixth
Amendment as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth guarantees that a
defendant in a state criminal trial has an independent constitutional right of
self-representation
And that he
may proceed to defend himself without counsel when he voluntarily and
intelligently elects to do so,
And, in this
case, the state courts erred in forcing petitioner against his will to accept a
state-appointed public defender and in denying his request to conduct his own
defense. Pp. 422 U. S. 812-836.
Was a case
in which the Supreme
Court of the United States held that
criminal defendants have a
“Claimed”..?
“Constitutional
right to refuse counsel and represent
themselves in state
criminal proceedings,
To be enter into “Evidence” before His/her
“Honorable World Court Justices”
No comments:
Post a Comment