11.
“Prima Facie Tort”
August 20th 1619 – 2099
“Slavery Servitude”
“Black Codes Laws”
“Jim Crow Laws”
Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World
Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition)
To The Honorable His/her “World
Court of Justices” Civilized human rights of We thee (Negro) American
“captured” and “enslaved” race of the Defendant “The United States of America”
since the year
1619 Deep Dark Ages Defendant “United
States of America” et al 1000% criminal committing 1000% “Judicial Fraud”
Pursuant forever to the “Monetary Forever Judicial Fraud Corruption” direct at
the (Negro) race it very clear, in this continual ongoing hidden “Slave
Regime” controlled by the “Judicial Branch of Government”, as the
Ungodly Judicial Government of “United States
of America” et al official with “criminal (RICO) enterprise in “Slavery” intent
knowing that “Slavery Servitude”, in (America) was not ever even legal over, being
1000% official “Prima facie Tort” described 1000% herein United States District
Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” preside over “U.S. Docket No.
4:10-CV-02220 in 2011
“Slave
Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II Vs. Doctor Samuel Benjamin
Magnus Lawson M.D. officially Identified herein upon which said United
States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” preside over “U.S.
Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220 in 2011 when asking first on October 8th
2015 fully with already previously Knowledge exactly why
“Slave
Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Doctor Samuel Benjamin
Magnus Lawson M.D. filed said civil suit even before his (Confusing) court as
explain
The
Official Very # 1 Non-Fiction “Sherlock Holmes” case of “The Prince Witch
Voodoo Doctor” none other than
Samuel
Benjamin Magnus-Lawson, M.D., (dob.) 8/11/1964
A/k/a
Rex Okusaga (DOB.)10/04/48 a/k/a Prince Benjamin Magnus-Lawson of Lagos
Nigeria, Africa
A/k/a
Ben Magnus-Lawson (dob.)11/12/1961
And his
corrupted control over Natural “Sister” Johanna Ann Magnus Lawson being
official to being Thee “Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
dealing with the issue of false identity, contracting sexually transmitted V. D.,
and a host of “other” ungodly twisted criminal activates legally in the “United
States of America” while being a (Actual) Doctor M.D.
And
Prince for Lagos Nigeria Africa whom also practice “Voodoo Cult” while dealing
with “Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton “Sister”
Rough and hostile quite confusing United
States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” presides over “U.S.
Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220
now “twice” upon which precisely at the
October 8th 2015 09:15 AM hour by Telephone “United States of
America” “United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, asking why
I filed suit once more again against
Doctor Samuel
Benjamin Magnus Lawson M.D. officially Identified herein “U.S. Docket
No. 4:10-CV-02220 while (RICO) enterprising quite confusing furtherance’s “United
States District Judge”
Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” preside over
“U.S. Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220 and Order
“Slave
Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II and counsel for Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus Lawson M.D.
officially Identified herein “U.S. Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220 to “physically
appear” before United States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially”
preside over
“U.S. Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220 in 2011 when United States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” preside over said case and Met “Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) face to face in “Live Court” and on official government transcript
“U.S. Docket No. 4:10-CV-02220 in 2011 when United States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt “Officially” preside over said case and Met “Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) face to face in “Live Court” and on official government transcript
Upon which precisely at the October 8th
2015 09:15 AM hour by Telephone “United States of America” “United States
District Court, Southern District of Texas, Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton
II (USN) 2015
“Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein asking why I filed suit civil action, against Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law
“Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein asking why I filed suit civil action, against Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law
And
as already “Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) having
massive nightmares of further falsely in 2011 “Criminally Imprisonment for 222
days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared incompetent to
even represent himself and never even been allowed to even have an affidavit of
probable cause for said arrest just hauled off
upon which being furtherance’s denied
among other civil claimed rights of (America) the official 6th amendment of
Defendant “United States of America” et al claim just constitution, and 1000%
denied the
14th Amendment protection in being “Negro” race having claimed equal protection of the laws of Defendant “United States of America” and
14th Amendment protection in being “Negro” race having claimed equal protection of the laws of Defendant “United States of America” and
“Slavery Servitude” being claimed over
on or about 1865 as “Pro Se Slave Negro”
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein upon falsely in 2011 “Criminally Slave
Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital”
declared incompetent to even represent himself and
Suffrages physical attack while being
“Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein upon falsely in 2011
against will “Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of
Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared mentally incompetent which the
Defendant
“United States of America” (Houston Division)
, Co-Defendant State of Texas, Co-Defendant Harris County, Co-Defendant Houston
Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”, and Co-Defendant Chief of Houston
Texas Police “Homicide Division” Houston Texas Police Dept. Co-Defendant(s)
“Gangbang”
Upon an official (RICO) enterprise “Criminal”
scheme of things involving “Texas Black Codes, Texas Jim Crow Laws and “August
20th 1619 forced “Slavery Servitude” in conjunction upon finally releasing “Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),
As “Chief Defendant” Mastermind” Thee “Infamous”
Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law being in
control of and a party thereof a “Secret White” controlling society in a
Keeping “Slavery Servitude” an ongoing institution within Defendant “United
States of America” et al “Entire” Jurisdiction at the time
“Pro Se Slave Negro” Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein upon falsely in 2011 “Criminally Slave Imprisonment
for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared
incompetent to even represent himself in a very “Mysterious secret criminal
case against
(Plaintiff) peace, will, safety and dignity
and suffrages actual unwanted physical attack, while innocently sleeping at
said “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared incompetent
“Chief Defendant” Mastermind” Thee
“Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
Co-Defendant Houston Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”,
And Co-Defendant Chief of Houston Texas
Police “Homicide Division” Houston Texas Police Dept. Co-Defendant(s)
Criminal engage further in the absolute
100,000% Grand Theft of Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein “Laptop Computer” containing In American civil procedure, the 100%
work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation
of U.S. Docket Number
Hamilton v. United States of America et
al decisions or orders for this case
Filed: December 15, 2010 as
1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: United States of America,
Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas
Eastern District Court
Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Filed: April 17, 2012 as 12-40403
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES
HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of all other African
American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President, RUTHERFORD B. HAYES
Court: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Type: Other Statutes RICO
http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/dear-santa-president-obama
Criminal engage furtherance’s in the
absolute Theft of Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
“Laptop Computer” containing In American civil procedure, the 100% work-product
doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S.
Docket Number
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et
al
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C.
ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G. JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R.
TREJO, SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY, CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND,
MIKE COX'S BAIL SVC,
LACEY'S DELI, JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE
HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK THERING, RING INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL,
DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-GARCIA, MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F.
M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA MARTINEZ and ALLEN J. GUIDRY
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31,
2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth
Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca5/11-20216
The official deposition of Thee
“Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
further all legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer bag,
And the VIP “Theft of Personal Property of “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston
Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, which do exist as
“We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…
“World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition) file to “World Honorable
Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague exhibit (A)
“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery)
dated August 15th 2011, whom pursuant to Civil No. 4:10-CV-2709, “The Vickery
Law Firm” provided the
“Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein “legal deposition” upon which said legal deposition
being stolen from me Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
on the exact date of March 14th 2011 at the precise time of 15:13 PM hour by
the criminal conduct of
Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas Police Dept in 2011 precisely said
(RICO) grand theft with all parties described herein conspire against
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31,
2011 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO as this
grand criminal conspire hostile abduction illusion directed at “Pro Se Slave
Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), (Life) herein upon being said falsely
in 2011 “Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222 days, in the
“State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital”
declared incompetent to even represent himself in a very “Mysterious secret
criminal case against (Plaintiff) peace, will, actual physical safety and
dignity in major RICO enterprise dealing in among other things
“Obstruction of Justice” to hinder,
foil, brings to a stop, hamper, impede, inhibit, and prevent official
Government Public records of “Deposition” by “The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy
Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney
at Law, being filed before the
“Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” all of which “Proclaim” as this very
undersigned “Notary Seal Date” of this “Complaint filed” before, United States
District Court, The District of Columbia being official in the Year of 2016 of
the Lord,
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford,
60 U.S. 393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
being kidnapped in 2011, and theft of his property, all to protect Houston
Scrooge Attorney
“Harry C. Arthur Esq.” and His (RICO)
scheme of things involving a Downtown (CBD) building belong to the “official”
site of “President the “Sam Houston” of the Republic of Texas…..
Upon which as of this undersigned notary
sealed date (Building) just sit there in years of “Decay” as all parties
involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church Cathedral” ,A Homeless soup kitchen for $250,000 U.S.
Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of thing to erect a $20s – 40s plus (Millions)
newer building,
Upon which Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after released from “false slavery Imprisonment”,
thereafter 2011
The Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein having no legal standing in 2011- 2099 to appear
before a Federal Court of Law, in this “White Only”, never ending (RICO) enterprise ongoing “Slave Régime”
2015-2099, direct at the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
said “Personal Property”
Which the Legal document being
deposition of “Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law is 1000% Official Evidence
before Now a “World Court Honorable Justices” involving among other things
“Slaver Servitude” still ongoing in Defendant “United States of America” et al
as said “Personal Property” Which is the Legal document being deposition of
“Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law is 1000%
Official Evidence before now a “World Court Honorable Justices” criminally
(RICO) enterprise kept 1000% “Mummy Tomb” in a Vault for 4 years 9 months and
counting
When legally 1000% very confusing The
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein being at said Houston
Texas “Police Station”….asking for my
“BLACK COMPAQ LAPTOP”….but other then
returning it 100% safely with “Police respect” and all legal documents thereof
27 days Evidence physically stolen before “deadline” filing of Case Number:
11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: RICO
Instead on the exact date of March 14th
2011 at the precise time of 15:13 PM hour by the “Leading” “Mark Fuhrman” style
Homicide Detective resurrection of the Los Angeles Police Department once again
type criminal conduct of Co-Defendant
City of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas Police
Dept. direct at
1000% officially with criminal intent
transferred physical Legal Evidence contained in “BLACK COMPAQ LAPTOP”….to said
“Surplus and Salvage” for auction and (MIA) computer chips never even being
claimed on property evidence receipt engaging (Collectively) as a “Unit” in
Major 1000% (RICO) enterprise scheme of things in among other things
“Obstruction of Justice” and in the
hostile mysterious abduction of Pro Se Slave Negro “Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein and his “Personal Property” among all was destroyed as criminal
conduct of Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” et al
Houston Texas Police Dept. direct at
1000% officially with criminal intent
“Pick and Chosen” their collective Criminal claimed evidence against Pro Se
Slave Negro “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein while committing to “Such”
(RICO) enterprising conduct ongoing as described in Letter dated (Friday)
December 11th 2015
*Attached are copies of screenshots
showing when the item were returned to you or the status of the above property.
I understand your frustration in the letter and sincerely apologize for any
inconvenience this may have caused you. Have nice day.
No signature, but from the Desk of “L.K.
Johnson…? Sergeant Houston Texas Police Dept. “Property Division
But the Legal document being deposition
of “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law is 1000% Official Evidence before Now a
“World Court Honorable Justices” criminally (RICO) enterprise being kept 1000%
“Mummy Tomb” in a Vault for 4 years 9 months and counting on past
Terrorizing investigation claims made
against said Pro Se Slave Negro “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein still
live in 2015 as some 4 years 9 months and counting past as (RICO) enterprise
“White Only” Justice of (America) criminal conduct continual onward of
Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas
Police Dept. securing such “Obstruction of Justice” in White Only” constitution
of Defendant “United States of America” et al (Houston Division) already having
criminal (RICO) enterprising engaged in Judicial Fraud”, among other criminal
intent in favor of Chief Defendant
“Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law whom
legally filed a $250,000 “Legal Defamation Hit” direct at Pro Se Slave Negro
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein on global News upon all furtherance’s
as described before the World Honorable Court His/her Justice
As quite furtherance’s (RICO) enterprise
“Judicial Fraud” confusing United States District Judge Kenneth Michael Hoyt
“Offically” preside over Case Number 4:15-CV-02884 upon which precisely at the
09:15 AM hour by Telephone “United
States of America” “United States District Court, Southern District of Texas,
“Houston Division” a/k/a “Judge Kenneth
Hoyt” corrupted in 1000% “Judicial Fraud” and super
“White Only” constitution of (America) “brass
blue balls”, asking...?
Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein, having he taking his “Medications”…?
RICO
Hamilton v. Khare
Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Dinesh Chandra Khare
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hamilton v. Khare
Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Dinesh Chandra Khare
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
XXXVII
“Violation of America with Disabilities Act of 1990”
Deepest Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al
herein and
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a law that
was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1990.
In 1986, the National Council on Disability had recommended
enactment of an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and drafted the
first version of the bill which was introduced in the House and Senate in 1988.
It was signed into law on July 26, 1990, by President George H. W.
Bush, amended and signed by President George W. Bush with changes
effective January 1, 2009.
The ADA is a wide-ranging civil rights law that is intended to
protect against discrimination based on disability.
It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans
with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Upon which We Thee
continue abused (Negro) Race, affirm, state and fully declare all allegation,
contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully
cause of action as follows:
Pro Se “Slave Negro” (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein, pursuant to forever more “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
Deepest Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al 1000% (RICO) Judicial Fraud proving in Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
Deepest Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al 1000% (RICO) Judicial Fraud proving in Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
(Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, having no
legal standing ever and still a “Slave” and having ever no legal citizenship in
“United States of America”, upon which precisely at the
09:15 AM hour by Telephone “United States of America” “United
States District Court, Southern District of Texas, “Houston Division” a/k/a
“Judge Kenneth Hoyt” corrupted in 1000% “Judicial Fraud” and super “White
Only” constitution of (America) “brass blue balls”, asking...?
Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein, having he taking his “Medications”…? While said Federal
complaint on file and before said “United States of America” Judge Kenneth Hoyt
at the February 15th, 2016 AM hour claiming among other things,
Being criminally assaulted by Chief Defendant Doctor Dinesh
Chandra Khare”, herein being first and foremost committing Hostile
“Medical Battery”, tactics against the Pro Se Plaintiff “Will, Civil rights,
Peace and Dignity, and mental well being..!
Notwithstanding the noted legal facts Pro Se Slave Negro
(Petitioner) “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein is physically a “Permanently
Disable Veteran” protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act
And (RICO) enterprise stolen my Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner)
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein (American) issued “Social Security
Number” and all Construction employees Business information in a grand (RICO)
scheme of things legally As described in complaint on file and now on appeal
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca5/15-20612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR DINESH CHANDRA KHARE
Case Number:
15-20612
Filed:
October 23, 2015
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit:
RICO
Hamilton v. Khare
Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Dinesh Chandra Khare
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Southern District Court
Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
(33)
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca5/15-20612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR DINESH CHANDRA KHARE
Case Number:
15-20612
Filed:
October 23, 2015
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit:
RICO
Hamilton v. Khare
Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: Dinesh Chandra Khare
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Southern District Court
Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
(33)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein “Declare”,
State, and Affirm before the Honorable U.S. Justice In a half bake (RICO)
combine “greedy racket enterprise” in association with
“18 USC § 1343 RICO Wire Fraud”, “scheme of things” that has
accumulated gradually past acquisition of a simple “Fraud and Breach of
Construction Contract” in common laws within the State of Texas in that “
Chief Defendant Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein being first
and foremost “front man” between the exact dates of
June 25th 2015 and July 6th 7:20 pm 2015 first approached
(Pro Se Plaintiff) herein on behalf of himself and all the described Co-Defendant(s)
in paragraph (9-14) above collectively herein
“Enterprise Racket”complained of in conspiracy, connivance, complicity, plotting, secret understanding, scheming against the Pro Se Plaintiff herein “Will, Civil Rights, Peace and Dignity, and well being..!
(34)
“Enterprise Racket”complained of in conspiracy, connivance, complicity, plotting, secret understanding, scheming against the Pro Se Plaintiff herein “Will, Civil Rights, Peace and Dignity, and well being..!
(34)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further
“Declare”, State, and Affirm before the Honorable U.S. Justice Chief Defendant
“Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein Abuse his Position of Trust
and indeed Usage of “Special Skill” namely as being a (Doctor) committed to
include
Hostile “Medical Battery”, tactics against the Pro Se
Plaintiff “Will, Civil rights, Peace and Dignity, and mental wellbeing..!
Notwithstanding the noted legal facts Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis
Charles Hamilton II herein is physically a Permanently Disable Veteran
protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act;
Which Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein Abuse
his Position of Trust and indeed Usage of “Special Skill” to conspire against
Permanently Disable Veteran protected under: (ADA) American with Disability
Act;
As a tool to gain advantages over a Construction Contract with the
Pro Se Plaintiff herein at setting a low price on new home construction
per sq. ft.
In that Doctor Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, first
step committed to submitting
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein to a unwanted
“Forensic Mental Evaluation” over a period of several claim business
meeting dinners in Montgomery Texas between the dates of “June 25th 2015
And August 20th 2015
Pro Se Plaintiff further state, declare and affirm in fact did
notice at this time frame “short hand medical notes” being scribble down by
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” herein as he attempted
secretly entertaining and engaging in “Medical Battery”
Against the Pro Se Plaintiff in a range of off handed
particularized competency determinations questions, concerning, Depression,
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Competency, Violence risk assessment,
Mental Disability,Forensic psychology personality disorder, Bipolar, psychopath
and Sociopath evaluations of the Pro Se Plaintiff to include question of
the Pro se Plaintiff personal life, family and current economic conditions.
(35)
(35)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further
“Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” Chief
Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein then after obtaining the
unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation” on the Pro Se Plaintiff further commenced
On the 26th day of August 2015 from the time frame of 1:20 pm to
4:45 pm engage in hostile obnoxious fashion of “Harassment” and Aggressive
pressure of force, half truth , direct lies, coercion; in a “Public Nuisance”,
setting at the “Panda Food Restaurant” off FM 1960 in
Montgomery Texas in An act, condition, to cause Pro Se Plaintiff, shame, humiliation, awkwardness, confusion, hostility and anger from a Professional (Doctor) advantages already gain in this unwanted
Montgomery Texas in An act, condition, to cause Pro Se Plaintiff, shame, humiliation, awkwardness, confusion, hostility and anger from a Professional (Doctor) advantages already gain in this unwanted
“Forensic Mental Evaluation” now being used as a tool to elicit
shame, humiliation, awkwardness, confusion, hostility and anger for collusion
advantages of a “Breach of Construction Contract” in possible attempts
committed by
Pro Se Plaintiff expressing “among other things” hostility and
anger possibly violence directed at Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra
Khare”, in this Public disgrace shame to gain advantages over Pro se Plaintiff
“Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein to make
void Relationship between Pro Se Plaintiff and at Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”,
void Relationship between Pro Se Plaintiff and at Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”,
In concert, collusion, conspirer and present witness by Co
Defendant(s) Greg Miller, Co-Defendant, “Trillionaire Realty”, and
Co-Defendant “Trillionaire Assets” set up of a hostile “Public Nuisance”, and “Harassment”
setting at the “Panda Food Restaurant” off 1960 in Montgomery Texas base upon
said “Medical Battery” of an unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation”
conducted by Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”.
(36)
(36)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further
“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” in
that Now Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein engage in
the usage (twice) of the obtained unwanted “Forensic Mental Evaluation” on the
Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II”
Now all of which has become as a “Hostile Medical Battery Tool”
further against the Pro Se Plaintiff in public setting no less at “Panda Food
Restaurant” off 1960 in Montgomery obnoxious fashion of
“Harassment” and Aggressive pressure of force, half truth , direct
lies, coercion; in hopes (Pro Se Plaintiff) to display acts of rage, disturbance
and (Violence) in order that Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”
herein furtherance’s continue to obtain an advantage for a (Now) needed (ASAP)
“Breach of Construction contract” in favor of Defendant and
“Breach of Construction contract” in favor of Defendant and
Co-Defendant(s) collectively to cover up Co-Defendant(s) “GEETA
Group LLC,” Vipul Khare, “John Doe (Attorney at Law)”,
“Greg Miller”, Trillionaire Realty et al”, and “Trillionaire
Assets et al”, collectively involved Fraud in the same Civil Conspirer, “
Tortious Interference with Existing Contract”,
Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of Special Skill”, “Medical Battery”,
“Harassment”, “Public Nuisance”, “Obstruction of Justice”, “18 USC § 1343
RICO Wire Fraud”
Deceptive Trade Practices Acts, Brought in conjunction with
“Common law” Fraud and Breach of Contract, “Abuse of Position of Trust” or “Use
of Special Skill”,
“Common law Fraud”, “Intent Gross Negligence”, “Slander”, “Breach
of Fiduciary Duty”, “False Promise of Future Performance”, Detrimental reliance’s”,
aiding and abetting
And “Intentional infliction of emotional distress” scheme of
things in Concert, collusion and hostile actions with Chief Defendant “Doctor
Dinesh Chandra Khare”.
(37)
(37)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein further
“Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice” not
even being his “mental patient” of
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, whom engage in all
of this “Medical Battery” deceitfulness, trickery, deviousness and Fraud dealing
as first an introduction
To aid and advance a fraudulent pretenses, representations, scheme
and promises of Pro Se Plaintiff herein involved in future building of (5) New
Home Construction in Montgomery Texas under which
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” enhancement a barging plan which a construction business negations did in fact assumed and was reached transmits or
causes to be transmitted by means of phone communications, including
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” enhancement a barging plan which a construction business negations did in fact assumed and was reached transmits or
causes to be transmitted by means of phone communications, including
“Internet wire” (emails) and Phone Message wire Communication (IM)
Between
Between
Pro Se Plaintiff and Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra
Khare” being the front man under this disguise for future promise in obtaining
a money price fixing set up scheme of things at $48 U.S. Dollars per Sq. ft. on
properties located in Montgomery County Texas area with the first Project being
located at 3429 Nottingham Ln in Montgomery, Texas 77356.
To which now Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein
further “Declare”, “State”, and “Affirm” before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant
“Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare” usage such “Medical Battery” with a
total disregard for his profession as an attempted business “exit strategy” at
the expensive of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” Peace, will,
dignity, Civil rights and “mental well being”.
(40)
(40)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s)
“United States of America” et al and Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al
furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
in that
Namely Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, herein
having “Possibly” to aid furtherance’s a international (RICO) scheme of things
against the Pro Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II”, Co-Plaintiff(s) United
States of America” et al,
And Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al to include the “State
of California and The State of “New York”…among others, in false impersonation
as a License (Doctor) within the Jurisdiction of Co-Plaintiff “United States of
America” et al and
Co-Plaintiff “State of Texas” in direct violation of TEX OC. CODE
ANN. § 164.052: Texas Statutes - Section 164.052: as described in paragraph
TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052 : Texas Statutes - Section 164.052:
PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSE APPLICANT (a) A physician or an applicant for a license to practice medicine commits a prohibited practice if that person:(1) submits to the board a false or misleading statement, document, or certificate in an application for a license;
(2) presents to the board a license, certificate, or diploma that was illegally or fraudulently obtained;(3) commits fraud or deception in taking or passing an examination;(4) uses alcohol or drugs in an intemperate manner that, in the board's opinion, could endanger a patient's life;
(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable conduct that is likely to deceive or defraud the public, as provided by Section 164.053,
Or injure the public;(6) uses an advertising statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive;(7) advertises professional superiority or the performance of professional service in a superior manner if that advertising is not readily subject to verification;
(8) purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers to purchase, sell, barter, or use, a medical degree, license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a license, certificate, or diploma in or incident to an application to the board for a license to practice medicine;(9) alters, with fraudulent intent, a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma;
(10) uses a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma that has been:(A) fraudulently purchased or issued;(B) counterfeited; or(C) materially altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another person in an examination required by this subtitle for a medical license;
(12) engages in conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert an examination process required by this subtitle for a medical license;(13) impersonates a physician or permits another to use the person's license or certificate to practice medicine in this state;
(14) directly or indirectly employs a person whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates in the practice of medicine with a person:(A) whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked; or(B) who has been convicted of the unlawful practice of medicine in this state or elsewhere;
(16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in the procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts to perform or procure a criminal abortion, or attempts to aid or abet the performance or procurement of a criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporation that is not licensed to practice medicine by the board;
(18) performs an abortion on a woman who is pregnant with a viable unborn child during the third trimester of the pregnancy unless:
(A) the abortion is necessary to prevent the death of the woman;(B) the viable unborn child has a severe, irreversible brain impairment; or
(C) the woman is diagnosed with a significant likelihood of suffering imminent severe, irreversible brain damage or imminent severe, irreversible paralysis; or(19) performs an abortion on an unemancipated minor without the written consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian or without a court order, as provided by Section 33.003 or 33.004,
Family Code, authorizing the minor to consent to the abortion, unless the physician concludes that on the basis of the physician's good faith clinical judgment, a condition exists that complicates the medical condition of the pregnant minor and necessitates the
immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avoid a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function and that there is insufficient time to obtain the consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian.
(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(12), conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert the medical licensing examination process includes, as prescribed by board rules, conduct that violates:(1) the security of the examination materials;(2) the standard of test administration; or
(3) the accreditation process.(c) The board shall adopt the forms necessary for physicians to obtain the consent required for an abortion to be performed on an unemancipated minor under Subsection
(a). The form executed to obtain consent or any other required documentation must be retained by the physician until the later of the fifth anniversary of the date of the minor's majority or the seventh anniversary of the date the physician received or created the documentation for the record.
(41)
TEX OC. CODE ANN. § 164.052 : Texas Statutes - Section 164.052:
PROHIBITED PRACTICES BY PHYSICIAN OR LICENSE APPLICANT (a) A physician or an applicant for a license to practice medicine commits a prohibited practice if that person:(1) submits to the board a false or misleading statement, document, or certificate in an application for a license;
(2) presents to the board a license, certificate, or diploma that was illegally or fraudulently obtained;(3) commits fraud or deception in taking or passing an examination;(4) uses alcohol or drugs in an intemperate manner that, in the board's opinion, could endanger a patient's life;
(5) commits unprofessional or dishonorable conduct that is likely to deceive or defraud the public, as provided by Section 164.053,
Or injure the public;(6) uses an advertising statement that is false, misleading, or deceptive;(7) advertises professional superiority or the performance of professional service in a superior manner if that advertising is not readily subject to verification;
(8) purchases, sells, barters, or uses, or offers to purchase, sell, barter, or use, a medical degree, license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a license, certificate, or diploma in or incident to an application to the board for a license to practice medicine;(9) alters, with fraudulent intent, a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma;
(10) uses a medical license, certificate, or diploma, or a transcript of a medical license, certificate, or diploma that has been:(A) fraudulently purchased or issued;(B) counterfeited; or(C) materially altered;(11) impersonates or acts as proxy for another person in an examination required by this subtitle for a medical license;
(12) engages in conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert an examination process required by this subtitle for a medical license;(13) impersonates a physician or permits another to use the person's license or certificate to practice medicine in this state;
(14) directly or indirectly employs a person whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked;(15) associates in the practice of medicine with a person:(A) whose license to practice medicine has been suspended, canceled, or revoked; or(B) who has been convicted of the unlawful practice of medicine in this state or elsewhere;
(16) performs or procures a criminal abortion, aids or abets in the procuring of a criminal abortion, attempts to perform or procure a criminal abortion, or attempts to aid or abet the performance or procurement of a criminal abortion;(17) directly or indirectly aids or abets the practice of medicine by a person, partnership, association, or corporation that is not licensed to practice medicine by the board;
(18) performs an abortion on a woman who is pregnant with a viable unborn child during the third trimester of the pregnancy unless:
(A) the abortion is necessary to prevent the death of the woman;(B) the viable unborn child has a severe, irreversible brain impairment; or
(C) the woman is diagnosed with a significant likelihood of suffering imminent severe, irreversible brain damage or imminent severe, irreversible paralysis; or(19) performs an abortion on an unemancipated minor without the written consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian or without a court order, as provided by Section 33.003 or 33.004,
Family Code, authorizing the minor to consent to the abortion, unless the physician concludes that on the basis of the physician's good faith clinical judgment, a condition exists that complicates the medical condition of the pregnant minor and necessitates the
immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or to avoid a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function and that there is insufficient time to obtain the consent of the child's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian.
(b) For purposes of Subsection (a)(12), conduct that subverts or attempts to subvert the medical licensing examination process includes, as prescribed by board rules, conduct that violates:(1) the security of the examination materials;(2) the standard of test administration; or
(3) the accreditation process.(c) The board shall adopt the forms necessary for physicians to obtain the consent required for an abortion to be performed on an unemancipated minor under Subsection
(a). The form executed to obtain consent or any other required documentation must be retained by the physician until the later of the fifth anniversary of the date of the minor's majority or the seventh anniversary of the date the physician received or created the documentation for the record.
(41)
” In Direction violation of California Penal Code 529 PC
“False impersonation” (also known as “false personation”) is a crime in California. Under California Penal Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false impersonation when you:
1. Falsely personate someone (that is, pretend to be them) in their public or private capacity; and
2. Perform any other act that might cause the person you are impersonating to become liable to a lawsuit or prosecution or become obligated to pay money, or which might cause you to get some benefit from impersonating him/her.
(42)
In Direction violation of New York Penal Code.
Penal
§ 190.25 Criminal impersonation in the second degree.
A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the second degree when
he:
1. Impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with
intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; or
2. Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and
does an act in such pretended capacity with intent to obtain a benefit
or to injure or defraud another; or
3. (a) Pretends to be a public servant, or wears or displays without
authority any uniform, badge, insignia or facsimile thereof by which
such public servant is lawfully distinguished, or falsely expresses by
his words or actions that he is a public servant or is acting with
approval or authority of a public agency or department; and
(b) so acts
with intent to induce another to submit to such pretended official
authority, to solicit funds or to otherwise cause another to act in
reliance upon that pretense.
4. Impersonates another by communication by internet website or
electronic means with intent to obtain a benefit or injure or defraud
another, or by such communication pretends to be a public servant in
order to induce another to submit to such authority or act in reliance
on such pretense.
Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
(43)
“False impersonation” (also known as “false personation”) is a crime in California. Under California Penal Code 529 PC, you commit the crime of false impersonation when you:
1. Falsely personate someone (that is, pretend to be them) in their public or private capacity; and
2. Perform any other act that might cause the person you are impersonating to become liable to a lawsuit or prosecution or become obligated to pay money, or which might cause you to get some benefit from impersonating him/her.
(42)
In Direction violation of New York Penal Code.
Penal
§ 190.25 Criminal impersonation in the second degree.
A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the second degree when
he:
1. Impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with
intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; or
2. Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and
does an act in such pretended capacity with intent to obtain a benefit
or to injure or defraud another; or
3. (a) Pretends to be a public servant, or wears or displays without
authority any uniform, badge, insignia or facsimile thereof by which
such public servant is lawfully distinguished, or falsely expresses by
his words or actions that he is a public servant or is acting with
approval or authority of a public agency or department; and
(b) so acts
with intent to induce another to submit to such pretended official
authority, to solicit funds or to otherwise cause another to act in
reliance upon that pretense.
4. Impersonates another by communication by internet website or
electronic means with intent to obtain a benefit or injure or defraud
another, or by such communication pretends to be a public servant in
order to induce another to submit to such authority or act in reliance
on such pretense.
Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
(43)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s)
“United States of America” et al herein on the Behalf of Co-Plaintiff(s) “State
of Texas” et al furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the
“Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant Dr. Dinesh Chandra Khare is a Associate Professor,
Department of General Medicine ...
Hind Institute of Medical Sciences of Professors and Faculty,
Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine
Hind Institute of Medical Sciences is a private medical college and hospital located near Lucknow city in Barabanki district, Uttar Pradesh, India
(44)
Hind Institute of Medical Sciences is a private medical college and hospital located near Lucknow city in Barabanki district, Uttar Pradesh, India
(44)
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Co-Plaintiff(s)
“United States of America” et al, Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al
furtherance’s “Declare”, State, and Affirm before the “Honorable U.S. Justice”
Chief Defendant “Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare”, having no legal
medical (MD) standing within the Jurisdiction of The Co-Plaintiff(s) “United States
of America” et al, and
Co-Plaintiff(s) “State of Texas” et al while committed to “Medical
Battery” of the Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein as
described in this complaint.
http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/pro-se-plaintiff-louis-charles-hamilton-ii-co-plaintiffs-united-states-of-america-et-al-and-coplaintiff-state-of-texas-et-al-vs-chief-defendant-doctor-dinesh-chandra-khare-and-geeta-international-et-al
http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/pro-se-plaintiff-louis-charles-hamilton-ii-co-plaintiffs-united-states-of-america-et-al-and-coplaintiff-state-of-texas-et-al-vs-chief-defendant-doctor-dinesh-chandra-khare-and-geeta-international-et-al
Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein
“Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
Making for exactly (156) exact “ungodly
corrupted judicial racial bias years of being denied legal (Negro) race status
standing to proceed before any
Federal Court of Laws, on laws
“Dealing” with among required judicial
duties of the Deep Dark Ages Defendant in coming about Fair play in “equity”,
concerning “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein
Being the direct official 1000% cause for
direct/intentional infliction of emotional distress/exemplary damages and all
special compensatory awards direct to
“Slave Negro” Pro Se (Petitioner) Louis
Charles Hamilton II herein just (Negro) Race,
Already legally claim, in RICO
Hamilton v. Khare, Filed: October 2, 2015 as 4:2015cv02884,
Cause of Action:
Racketeering (RICO) Act with 6% intrest incurred from date of injury October 2,
2015
No comments:
Post a Comment