129.
Pursuant
to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), “Negro Slaves” namely Pro Se
“Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) affirm, state and fully declare
all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and
disharmony, fully as follows
the Co-Defendant 1000% being
The “State of Texas” herein (RICO) enterprising half bake “voting discrimination
scheme of thing against the “Negro Race” among other people of "color" within the
official “White Only” Constitution of The State of Texas et al
Since 2011 following Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), 1000 (RICO)
abduction/mystery false mental prison @ “Texas State Hospital” being 1000%
(America) “Negro Mad Maxx” escape Beyond
“Thunder Dome” compound @
“Doctor
Mind Bender” Asylum/Killer Hospital, suffrage of such 1000% “Murderous hostile
attack against his peace, will, dignity, safety and crooked claim “civil
rights” of Defendant “United States of America”,
130.
There
after the State of “Mississippi” fully legally declared admittance into the “Union”
of the “United States of America”, on or about the exact date of February 7th
2013 thereafter
Co-Defendant “State of Texas” et al “Criminal Directly engaging
in an ongoing scheme of enforcement of
“Slavery
Servitude” (RICO) enterprise scheme of continual things for “Unjust Enrichment”
“White Only”
engaging in (RICO) enterprising nature in continual criminal acts of “Slavery Servitude” money laundering
statutes, 18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957,
“Slavery Servitude” money laundering statutes, RICO statute (18
U.S.C. § 1961(1) for privileged, polished, well financial secure in Billions “White
Only” constitution of America continual
“Slave Régime” forevermore “Unjust
Enrichments” now 2016 - legal and political means to Restore the
Founders’ forever pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
“Slavery
Servitude” in 2013 leaving 44.5 plus still growing “Million Negro race” with no
legal standing ever or any actual legal citizenship thereafter the passage of
the 13th Amendment of the United States of America Constitution
after
1865 “Civil War” and the
official never ending “Texas Black Codes Laws” of 2011 - 2016 past and present direct
at among other things (RICO) “Texas Black Codes Voting Fraud Disfranchisement”
to keeping
Slavery
Servitude” forever 1000% in all Co-Defendant “State of Texas” “legal and
political” means to Restore the Founders’ forever pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) against
44.5 Million Negro Race 2011 – August 22nd
2013 thereafter
February 7th 2013 the State of “Mississippi” fully legally declared
admittance into the “Union” of the “Chief Defendant “United States of America”
et al herein,
131.
As
legally there upon which The U.S.
government sued on Thursday to keep Texas from carrying out a voter
identification requirement enacted in 2011, setting up a new battle between the
Obama administration and a state that is a conservative stronghold,
The Justice Department said in a suit filed
in U.S. District Court in Corpus Christi that Texas state lawmakers passed the
requirement to deny racial minorities the right to vote and, unlike other
states with similar laws, failed to take steps to prevent the law from being
discriminatory,
A federal court in Washington blocked the
Texas law in August 2012, but its ruling was undone in June when the U.S.
Supreme Court struck down part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
"We
will not allow the Supreme Court's recent decision to be interpreted as open
season for states to pursue measures that suppress voting rights," U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement
Separately, the Justice Department filed a
motion to intervene as a plaintiff in a Texas redistricting lawsuit brought on
behalf of minority voters
Voter ID laws - which require
government-issued identification before voting - have become a political and
racial flashpoint across the country. Democrats generally oppose the measures
and many Republicans back them.
132.
Supporters say they are needed to deter
people from illegally casting ballots, while opponents say voter fraud is
exaggerated in order to mask purposeful suppression of Democratic
constituencies.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a
Republican, called the Justice Department suit "gutter politics" and
"offensive to the overwhelming majority of Texans of all races who support
this ballot integrity measure." He has said he will defend the state's
voter ID law and redistricting plans in court.
In its ruling a year ago, the federal court
in Washington said Texas failed to ensure that voters could obtain ID cards
free of charge, noting that people would have to pay to obtain a certified copy
of their birth certificate or other proof of their ID and travel to a state
office to present it,
Critics argue that such conditions
effectively deny voting rights to people without means,
The courts and the Justice Department have
allowed voter ID laws in states that guaranteed that voters would face no
additional costs as a result of the laws,
Voting rights lawyers have said they expect
the Justice Department to sue other jurisdictions, possibly North Carolina over
its new voter ID law, as it looks for ways to protect minority voters,
Without naming any states, Holder, an
appointee of President Barack Obama, said that the Texas lawsuit
"represents the department's latest action to protect voting rights, but
it will not be our last
No comments:
Post a Comment