140.
Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein affirm,
state and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, fully cause by a
1000%
Legacy in past, present and future (RICO) Enterprise of all described
defendants collectively direct/indirectly engaging in deceit, sham, skills in a
position of Government, among others no less, displacement, events, and
circumstances of 1000%
“Fraud” and “Fraudulent Nondisclosure”
“Obstruction of Justice”, Judicial Fraud, Discrimination, Tortious
Interference’s with Fiduciary Duty of a “United States of America” Judicial
Absolute Immunity Branch of Government,
Civil Conspirer among other complex
golden endless web for “Unjust Enrichments”, in conjunction with “Black Codes
Laws” and “Jim Crow Laws, running current against the
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein within the Co-Defendant Namely “The State of Texas”,
continual “conspire”
Bias/Hate/Judicial
Fraud/Discrimination onward in 2015 directed at Federal “Civil Suit” Hamilton vs.
Doctor Dinesh Chandra Khare et al
Case Number:
|
15-20612
|
Filed:
|
October 23, 2015
|
Court:
|
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
|
141.
Chief Defendant “United States of
America” et al,, upon which thee “United States Supreme Court” engaged in among
other “White Supremacy” past “Obstruction
of Justice”, Judicial Fraud, Conspire in
“Breach of Fiduciary Duty” among
other criminal (RICO) enterprise acts and actions to keeping just
Pursuant to Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S.
393 (1857), and as a direct result thereof
Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II herein born November 8th
1961 furtherance’s fully “State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” February 18th 2013
“Slavery Servitude Institution” of
The Defendant “United States of America” herein being legally declared
officially ended as Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II born
November 8th 1961- February 7th 2013 being a official Slave of The
Defendant “United States of America” herein for exactly (52) years.
Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II, furtherance’s fully
“State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” Natural Daughter “Natasha C. Hamilton”, herein
Born
December 30th 1991- February 7th 2013 being a official Slave
of The Defendant “United States of America” herein for exactly (22) years.
Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II, furtherance’s fully
“State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” Natural Son “Aaron Michael Halvorsen (Hamilton
II), herein Born
April 12th 1985- February 7th 2013 being a official Slave of
The Defendant “United States of America” herein for exactly (28) years,
Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), furtherance’s
fully “State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” the same faith for
Parents, Brothers,
Sister, Grand Parents, and all Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II
direct DNA descendant(s) collectively to exact date of August 20th
1619 being 1000%
“The United States of America” 1619-Feburary 7th 2013
official “Slavery Servitude Continual “Institution” designed commitment under
the Rule of Law, by the ever so powerful “White Supremacy”, ruling class
and Defendant
“Supreme Court” of the “United States of America” and there secret white
controlling society Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393
Against the Peace, Will, Dignity, and legal well being of Pro Se “Slave
Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), thereafter collectively
Defendant and
Co-Defendant(s) Claim Union each Jurisdiction 52 “States” residing in “The United
States of America” et al since 1619 - February 7th 2013 “Slavery
Servitude” grim events, being
100 and 50% direct (RICO) enterprise criminal conscious intent
absolutely refusal to ending such hostile, illegal “Secret White Society Ruling
Class” imposed corruption as force “Slavery Servitude” beyond 1865, directly involving
Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), furtherance’s
fully “State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” being a party thereof 1000% legal in all
court filings against said Defendant/Co-defendants et al herein
Chief Defendant “The United States of America” et al leading since 2010
and beyond,
142.
However” as destroyed by their
own accord, “claimed (American)
civil rights under the 4th, 6th 13th and 14th amendment of Defendant “The United States of America” et al with leading in whole sale
“Death and direct destruction” thereof past 1865 – February
7th 2013 pursuant
to official direct destruction of Defendant “The United States of America” et
al on rules of governing laws namely official
"Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall
have been duly convicted,
Shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
“Formally abolishing slavery
in the United States,
The 13th Amendment was
passed by the Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on
December 6, 1865.
“However” the issue of “Venue” at present is legally under hostile corrupted
judicial fire in Texas Jurisdiction, Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton
II (USN), herein
Fully “affirm”, “contends”, “declare”, that “Black Codes Laws” still
being enforced directly against the peace, will, dignity, and claim civil
rights of
Pro Se “Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II, (USN)” herein within the Co-Defendant
State of Texas, “Federal and State Courts” jurisdiction and bias (RICO)
enterprise direct at namely
Pro Se “Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II,
(USN)” herein being filed as such in past which was dismissed when
“Officially” “Slavery Servitude” still ongoing at the time being imposed
against the entire (Negro) race of Chief Defendant “United States of America”
et al and
“Black Codes Laws”, “Jim Crow Laws” all three together running (RICO) enterprise
precisely concurrent involving directly Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein born into this madness now, in 2016 dealing with
“Slavery Servitude” and rights of the Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein within the “Jurisdiction” of (America) until February
7th 2013, clearly providing a conflict of Interest for
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein and His very own (Negro) race children(s), and Family
being born in such a “unjust”, “corrupted”, “confusing” and very “illegal state”,
of the Defendant “The United States of America”
When this issue was declared officially legally over in 1865. ” but not until - February 7th 2013
claiming being Forced “slavery servitude” is no longer legally require pursuant
to said 13th Amendment of Defendant “United States of America” et al…?
The 14th
Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9th, 1868, and
granted citizenship to “all people born or naturalized in the United States,”
which included former slaves recently freed, but freed in February 18th
2013…?
“The Jurisdiction question(s)
among many being raised is simple”
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S.
393 (1857) Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein now after February 7th 2013 having not any official legal
citizenship at all residing and living in
“The United States of America” as Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein Affirm, and Declare
officially
143.
The 13th and 14th
Amendment of Defendant “The United States of America” do not even exist at all
after 1865-at the latest 1868 “Slavery servitude” continual onward precisely
145 years secretly later until February 7th 2013, being 100% “fully
void”,
“Not valid” or “not ever having any legally
binding” status on behalf of Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein Negro DNA of being a Slave
for such provision of the 13th
and 14th Amendment as
The 14th
Amendment to the Constitution of Defendant “The United States of America” et al
which in the past was legally ratified on July 9th, 1868,
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) Pro Se Slave
Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein
now after February 7th 2013 in this present date of January 2016
being the Legal official Chattel Property of Defendant “The United States of
America”,
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein, affirm officially
conducting His Very own Federal Court Trial following Hurricane Katrina” in 2011
in the matter
144.
Hamilton v.
Dennis et al, No. 1:2009cv00289 - Document 22 (E.D. Tex. 2009)
Court Description:
MEMORANDUM OPINION re motion to transfer venue.
Ordered that Plaintiff's 13 motion for change of venue is granted. An order
transferring this case to the
New Orleans Division of the Eastern District of
Louisiana will be entered separately. Signed by Magistrate Judge Earl S. Hines
on 10/1/09. (bjc, )
145.
But
in the same 2011 time frame Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein, affirm, state and fully
declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, officially
Co-Defendant namely “State of
Texas” et al “Kept” every discover in this matter in direct violation of “Duty
to Disclose” this sham criminal proceeding, as the only, obligation of just
rights under Texas Laws, is a
Dark Holding cell, not allow to even challenge, the Court, or the
District Attorney Office, as some Crazy Criminal Claimed Public Defender,
having absolute control over
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein this Dark Dirty Holding cell,
and refusal to leave
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein “Alone” other
than cussing me out, telling me Nothing I can do about him being my
“Attorney”
and (I) am going to now on a “Tour” to the Dirty Hostile Harris County War Gang Tour of Jail Duty as
146.
(RICO) furtherance’s
into an ongoing 2016 “abduction/mystery” false mental prison @ “Texas State
Hospital” being 1000% (America)
“Negro Mad Maxx” escape Beyond
“Thunder Dome” compound @ “Doctor Mind Bender” Asylum/Killer Hospital, yet no “Attorney”
on my side, some
“White Only” crook, I refuse, and having my
own criminal motion discover request to have a direct nature of the charges
after Video Interview with “Houston Texas” police dept. which giving consent,
then and was not declared,
F-U-C-K-I-N-G Mental Crazy, and don’t understanding
Crooked (America) Judicial System, as pursuant to Faretta v. California, case attached below in paragraph (147)
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein, do not even having any direct or
indirect knowledge what the Crooked Court of Texas in Harris County, even look
likes, who That
“White Female Bitch” Judge
was as I heard her voice only, let alone be, heard before a criminal court of
law, to present a case to self represent against Co-Defendant “State of Texas”,
whom having major Bias against
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein, long before “Mystery”
arrest/abduction/kidnapping, while claiming this Negro, having no understanding
of
“Criminal Laws” or even function to eat a bowl of cold soup, while, Co-Defendant
Conspire claiming official incompetent claimed against Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein, whom
Just finishing in 2010 filing
required “Slavery Servitude” August 20th 1619 compensation on behalf
of 44.5 plus Million Negro Race 6 trillion U.S. Dollars Federal “Civil RICO Suit”
against a
“Slave Régime” namely “United States of America” as all against Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein, 6th amendment right
pursuant to
Faretta v. California, held hostage in this (RICO) Conspire False
Imprisonment sham, being described now in 2016, as all evidence still being
with held, in connection with theft of property
(RICO) enterprise “espionage” Spy Ring” copying and destruction thereof all
legal files for direct legal issue over compensation on
behalf of
44.5 plus Million Negro Race namely 6 trillion U.S. Dollars Civil Suit,
filed by Pro
Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein
147.
Faretta v.
California
No. 73-5772
Argued November 19, 1974
Decided June 30, 1975
422 U.S. 806
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
Syllabus
No. 73-5772
Argued November 19, 1974
Decided June 30, 1975
422 U.S. 806
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA,
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
Syllabus
The Sixth Amendment as made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth
guarantees that a defendant in a state criminal trial has an independent
constitutional right of self-representation
And that he may proceed to defend himself without counsel when he
voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so,
And, in this case, the state courts erred in forcing petitioner against his
will to accept a state-appointed public defender and in denying his request to
conduct his own defense. Pp. 422 U. S. 812-836.
Was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that
criminal defendants have a “Claimed”..? “Constitutional right to refuse counsel
and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings,
148.
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein furtherance’s affirm,
state and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation,
argument, conflict and disharmony, that in 2011 said Attorney, are order not to
provide any discovery to a criminal defendant
in
Harris County, Texas as so under legal court contract,
which said contract, is filed as evideance, in Hamilton v. State of Texas et al Filed: December 8, 2011 as 4:2011cv04256 Defendant: Donnell
Johnson, Daniel M Gawrysiak,
Alexander Olivieri and others Plaintiff: Louis
Charles Hamilton, II Cause Of
Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
149.
Completely officially herein provides
Venue, is just official being “fair,
“legal” and precise correct being 1000%
proper before United States District Court, the District of
Columbia
“Honorable Justice”, as described below
for all cause of actions pertaining “only” directly to this Complaint,
As “Justice” “having had the
“Honorable Justice” entertained honest
precise chances to preside over the “issue” being presented especially
concerning “Slavery Servitude” in “The United States of America et al and claimed
“Negro Race” civil rights of the
Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN), herein within the “Jurisdiction” of claimed Just
Constitution of Defendant (America), thereafter needing advance on appeal only
leading directly
“Simply” To the Honorable “World Court of
Justice” address at The Hague In view of the “Entire” International Community”
No comments:
Post a Comment