9.
“We Thee Abused United States American
Veterans et al (American) “Negro DNA Race”… PLANTIFFS” being 1000% now thee
official “Property” of Deep Dark ages United States of America et al after
February 7th 2013 of having no legal citizenship a (RICO) scheme of things
surround to furtherance’s acts of
18 U.S. Code § 1031 –“Fraud against
the United States”
18 U.S. Code § 2101 – Riots in a
nature involving continual (RICO) enterprise pursuant to engaging in Direct
violation of “Articles of Agreement Relating to the Surrender of the
Army of Northern Virginia" April
10, 1865 to furtherance’s said (RICO) enterprise “scheme of things” directed at
“We Thee Abused United States American
Veterans et al (American) “Negro DNA Race”… PLANTIFFS” Affirm state
and fully declare all allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument,
conflict and disharmony, fully
Chief Defendant Donald John Trump's
Sr. Response to Belgium Attacks in “Direct Violation of to incite “Jihad”
against the United States of America et al directed at “PLANTIFFS” herein
Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act
(Pub. L. No. 107-52) expanded the definition of terrorism to cover
""domestic,"" as opposed to international, terrorism.
A person engages in domestic terrorism if
they do an act ""dangerous to human life"" that is a
violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act
appears to be intended to:
(i)
intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
(ii) influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by
mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.
Additionally, the acts have to occur primarily within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States and if they do not, may be regarded as
international terrorism.
Section 802 does not create a new
crime of domestic terrorism. However, it
does expand the type of conduct that the government can investigate when it is
investigating ""terrorism."" The USA PATRIOT Act expanded governmental
powers to investigate terrorism, and some of these powers are applicable to
domestic terrorism.
The definition of domestic terrorism
is broad enough to encompass the activities of several prominent activist
campaigns and organizations. Greenpeace, Operation Rescue, Vieques Island and
WTO protesters and the Environmental Liberation Front have all recently engaged
in activities that could subject them to being investigated as engaging in
domestic terrorism.
One recent example is the Vieques
Island protests, when many people, including several prominent Americans,
participated in civil disobedience on a military installation where the United
States government has been engaging in regular military exercises, which these
protesters oppose.
The protesters illegally entered the military
base and tried to obstruct the bombing exercises.
This conduct would fall within the
definition of domestic terrorism because the protesters broke federal law by
unlawfully entering the airbase and their acts were for the purpose of
influencing a government policy by intimidation or coercion.
The act of trying to disrupt bombing
exercises arguably created a danger to human life - their own and those of
military personnel.
Using this hypothetical as a starting
point, we will go through the USA PATRIOT Act and explore the new governmental
powers that could be brought to bear on Vieques Island protesters whose conduct
falls within the overbroad definition of domestic terrorism.
Seizure of assets - Sec. 806: Section 806 of the Act could result in the
civil seizure of their assets without a prior hearing, and without them ever
being convicted of a crime.
It is by far the most significant change of
which political organizations need to be aware.
Section 806 amended the civil asset forfeiture
statute to authorize the government to seize and forfeit: all assets, foreign or domestic
(i)
of any individual, entity, or organization
engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of domestic or international
terrorism against the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign
or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or
organization or
(ii)
(ii)
acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of
supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing an act of domestic or
international terrorism against the United States, citizens or residents of the
United States or their property or (iii) derived from, involved in, or used or
intended to be used to commit any act of domestic or international terrorism
against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their
property.
Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr.
and Jr. et al and Co-Defendant(s) described herein engages in domestic
terrorism act "
"dangerous to human life"" that was so
intended to in 1000% a violation of the
criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be
intended to:
Upon which Chief Defendant Donald John Trump
Sr. and Jr. et al and Co-Defendant(s) described herein engages in massive
counts of inciting domestic rioting, which did occurred throughout the dates
descried above alone with this Money Fraud to support and funding the (KKK),
such acts of "dangerous to human life"" to the “entire” United
States of America “Population, and continual in doing so as of this undersigned
date
(i)
Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii)
(ii)
influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by
mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.
Additionally, the acts have to occur primarily within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States and if they do not, may be regarded as
international terrorism.
Upon which Chief Defendant Donald John
Trump Sr. and Jr. et al and Co-Defendant(s) described herein engages in massive
millions of counts of inciting Violent Jihadist Attacks of international
terrorism
as well as directed at the “Plaintiffs”
Violent Jihadist Attacks within the Jurisdiction of the “Honorable Court” Namely
“United States of America in Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. and Jr. et
al
and Co-Defendant(s) described herein engages Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs.
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
Making and taking back America to
Feburary 7th 2013 the official Slavery Servitude directed
at
the “Plaintiffs” and at the Entire 44.5 plus Million of Negro’s Race of America
all, of Which are not even legal citizen as of this undersign dated due in
Large major legal constitunal
provisions parts to the “Congress” wholesale 1000% destruction of the 13th
Amendment of The American Constitution, freeing the N-i-g-g-e-r- “Slaves” back
on or about as “Bogus and Quite fraudulently clamed 1865 Civil War” vs.
Feburary 7th 2013…? Which Chief Defendant Donald John Trump Sr. and Jr.
et al and Co-Defendant(s) described herein engages in being a “Party thereof
and Directly/indirectly involved with
November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy
was assassinated
April 4, 1968 the of assassination of .
...Martin Luther King Jr.
June 6, 1968, the of assassination of Robert
Francis "Bobby" Kennedy,
among many others to Killed back to Abe Lincoln keeping “Slavery Servitude ongoing in (USA) for Unjust Enrichments till February 7th 2013
among many others to Killed back to Abe Lincoln keeping “Slavery Servitude ongoing in (USA) for Unjust Enrichments till February 7th 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment