62.
(Petitioner)
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally,
furtherance’s herein U.S. Civil Action,
Hamilton
v. United States of America et al
Defendant:
United States of America, State Of Texas and Harris County Texas
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II Case Number: 1:2011cv00122
Filed:
March 9, 2011 Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office:
Beaumont Office County: Jefferson
Presiding
Judge: Marcia A. Crone Referring Judge: Keith F. Giblin
Nature
of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause
of Action: 28:1983 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
63.
A
lawyer who owns an office building located near The Beacon, a day center for
homeless people in downtown Houston, filed a suit Monday seeking a permanent
injunction to shut down the operation on the ground it’s a “private nuisance.”
Lawyer
Harry C. Arthur seeks a minimum of $250,000 in damages from defendants Christ
Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate him for the loss of rentals in
his building and the loss of its market value.
Officially
“Christ Church Cathedral” a homeless soup kitchen being sued by “Law office of
Harry C. Arthur
Thee
“Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. Address: 1305 Prairie St # 200, Houston,
TX 77002 Phone: (713) 224-7996 for $250,000 U.S. Dollars
And all of the “Homeless” Houston Texas Street people including (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 herein
Being officially “Affirm”, by the
Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” (Houston Division) and their Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” Henchmen”,
“Pursuant
to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
The
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals”, legally,
I present to “World Honorable Presiding
“Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague and
The
Entire “International Community”, to all be residing in (America) forever as “Derelicts”
upon which, as described in the Media
“Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a state court suit in
November 2009 seeking to shut down
a church-sponsored operation in downtown Houston that provides meals,
counseling and laundry service for homeless people.
In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church
Cathedral, et al., Arthur and
The Marine Building, an office
building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon, the
homeless center.
Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million
from Lawyer, Building
Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, Texas
Lawyer
January 11, 2010”
Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202437766999/Homeless-Man-Seeks-24-Million-From-Lawyer-Building#ixzz3s9Zn8ouf
“HOUSTON A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it down.
The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.
An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.
On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything they can to keep The Beacon open.
People of Christ Church Cathedral have been on this corner for 170 years actually on this corner right across the street trying to take care of the poor and the needy and the homeless. That s the Christian admonition, that s the mission of the cathedral and of The Beacon and we don t intend to be shut down, Andy Vickery, attorney for The Beacon, said.
In his lawsuit, attorney Harry C. Arthur, described the people who use the shelter as derelicts and said their presence has cost him business.”
http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/11/11264294/
64.
(Petitioner)
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally,
furtherance’s herein
“Pursuant
to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),
Making
for exactly (156) exact “ungodly corrupted judicial racial bias years of being
denied legal (Negro) race status standing to proceed before any
Federal Court of Laws, on laws “Dealing” with
among required judicial duties of the Deep Dark Ages Defendant in coming about
Fair play in “equity”, concerning (Petitioner)
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), being abducted, there after the filing of this
civil action, against Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C.
Arthur” Attorney at Law
And
falsely in 2011 “Criminally Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail)
upon which the Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” (Houston
Division) ,
State
of Texas, Harris County, Houston Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”, and City
of Houston Texas (Police Dept.) Property Division 1202 Washington Ave. Houston
Texas upon finally releasing (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
Criminal
engage further in the absolute Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing
In
American civil procedure, the 100% work-product doctrine protects materials
prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket Number
Hamilton
v. United States of America et al decisions or orders for this case
Filed:
December 15, 2010 as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Johnson
Cause
Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court:
Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court
Type:
Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Filed:
April 17, 2012 as 12-40403
Plaintiff
- Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on
behalf of all other African American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United
States of America
Defendant
- Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President, RUTHERFORD B.
HAYES
Court:
Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Type:
Other Statutes RICO
Criminal
engage furtherance’s in the absolute
Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer”
containing
In
American civil procedure, the 100% work-product doctrine protects materials
prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket Number
Louis
Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al
Plaintiff
- Appellant:
LOUIS
CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant
- Appellee:
HARRY
C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G.
JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R. TREJO, SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY,
CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND, MIKE COX'S BAIL SVC, LACEY'S DELI,
JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK THERING, RING
INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL, DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-GARCIA,
MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F. M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA MARTINEZ and
ALLEN J. GUIDRY
Case
Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO
The
official deposition of Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C.
Arthur” Attorney at Law, further all legal files, computer chips, social
security card, computer bag, and the VIP “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston
Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, which do exist as
“We
Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague
(Petition) file to “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of
Justice” The Hague exhibit (A)
“The
Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) dated August 15th 2011, whom
pursuant to Civil No. 4:10-CV-2709,
“The
Vickery Law Firm” provided the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein legal deposition upon which said legal deposition being stolen from me (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
in 2011
“The
Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
all of which
“Proclaim”
as this very undersigned “Notary Seal Date” being official in the Year of 2015
of the Lord,
Pursuant
to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein being kidnaped in 2011, and theft of his
property, all to protect Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” and His
(RICO) scheme of things involving a
Downtown
(CBD) building belong to the “official” site of “President The “Sam Houston” of
the Republic of Texas…..
Upon
which as of this undersigned notary sealed date (Building) just sit there in
years of “Decay” as all parties involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church
Cathedral”
A
Homeless soup kitchen for $250,000 U.S. Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of
thing to erect a $20s plus (Millions) newer building,
Upon
which Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after released
from “false Imprisonment”, thereafter 2011
The
(Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein having no legal standing in
2011- 2099 to appear before a Federal Court of Law, as described in the “Complaint”
as follows below in paragraph 65
Or
to legally proceed in 2015-2016 for the entire criminal (RICO) kidnapping,
abduction and theft of property acts as being described above in paragraph 62-64:
65.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff Complaint
Jury Demand
Vs.
Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)
Defendant
Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
Co-Defendant(s)
1.
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles
Hamilton II, hereby files a Complaint with the above Honorable Court and for
Cause of Action(s)”
The Plaintiff will show the Honorable
Court all facts as follows:
2.
The Plaintiff seeks cause of actions for each
described Defendant(s) Herein knowing, wanton, licentious, and immoral
intentionally committed, conspire, prepare or directed and orchestrated,
Primarily all extreme and outrageous acts and
actions in conscious disregards for Violations committed under Chapter 96 of
Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption
Organization against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
3.
To include but not limited to each said
defendant(s) Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Defendant, Law office of Harry C. Arthur
et al, Co- Defendant(s) and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al, Co-Defendant(s)
herein knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to
organize, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and abetting ,
Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing,
And orchestrated primarily all extreme
unprovoked, and outrageous acts and actions described herein with a total
conscious disregards for (among other things) Violations by said defendant(s)
being committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO)
Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of
“others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein;
4.
With further cause of actions Plaintiff will
show giving rise to this Honorable U.S. District Court Civil suit filed by the
said Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
For each said described Defendant(s) herein
collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a
civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial
proceeding with Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to
defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence,
dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal
Judicial proceeding , (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material
facts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a
Texas Honorable District Court, among other cause of actions;
All dedicated, devoted and committed against
the Plaintiff legal rights as a United States Citizen base primarily because of
the Plaintiff race of African American, and base also solely because of
Plaintiff Disability, economic & education status
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act,
bogus sham structure to downgrade & depreciate first the property belong to
(Christ) and the surrounding area,
Then second this scheme of the Defendant(s)
collectively shamelessly sought to impose permanent closure on the property of
(Christ),
Then their after said civil malicious tort
having been put into effect, impose and enforce on the property belong to
(Christ)
Defendant(s) collectively further sought to
apply if needed further full/semi- Hostile course, approach, ploy, device,
maneuver and tactic to take further over of the property of (Christ) and to get
hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & )achieve property belonging to (Christ
Church Cathedral Beacon operation) in Houston Texas (here after name and all
interest thereof) (“Christ”.)…(
For each defendant(s) herein financial
gain in a “New Retrofitted Legal” office complex & expansion of a Deli”
With the division of all of the
ill-gotten pilferage of (Christ) federal, private, donated, funds in excess of
$250,000.00 dollars Defendant (Arthur) finally makes with his majority share
needed building repairs by way of Painting”,
And finally after “(3) SOME PLUS”
years defendant (Arthur) finally can afford to pay to clean the “Mummified
human waste (Crap) matter of platter stains on the “Marine Building L.L.C.” on
a “National Historic Property” sight in Houston Texas
And or alternatively the Plaintiff will show
quite easy to the Honorable Court that the “Chief Organizer” & designer of
the “Malicious Civil Tort” and all Fraudulent material facts involved therein;
Defendant (Arthur) having some other hidden
third party conglomerate real estate developer(s) company(s) in the waiting
position ranks to further take over the property of (Christ) with profits
distribution, sharing, and benefit(s) in favor of all the Defendants
collectively herein in some form or manner as this organization precisely
agreed upon;
With the Defendant (Arthur) and
Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) collectively finally having the
Professional Ruthless legal repute reputation of having shut down (Christ) at
the expense of (Christ) and the Plaintiff and other similar the same as the
Plaintiff
And (Arthur) gluttonous, greedy materialistic
pockets are effusive abundantly & fully line with gold.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that
the Plaintiff was held secretly against & in opposition to his will, and
was to be required in the full participation of victimizations of all numerous
phases in order that all of the defendant(s) entire collectively scheme of
things was enforced up to the point the Plaintiff being evicted wrongfully from
(Christ) and the final scheme of things move forward as plan.
5.
Plaintiff herein file for a Cause of action
for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively wrongful, deceitful
commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination
& Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction
of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage because
of the Plaintiff is a mental disable person or a persons cover under (ADA)
American with disability act; to include but not limited to
6.
Cause of action for each said described
Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit
to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices,
Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice
under (RICO) statue with false oaths and claims to aid in the scam of the
defendant(s) as describing herein this complaint under (RICO) statue,
To include but not limited to the Plaintiff
will show the Honorable Court each defendant did in fact commit collective
violation(s) of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (as amended 1994 and 1996) for
fraudulent wide spread media coverage in connection with a “Financial crime”,
conspiracy in connection thereof, unauthorized access and fraudulent providing
false and misleading “Material Facts Through a protected computer” Media
Computer(s), “Internet”, public records and all court: txed via-
All judicial records & Media
records, recordings thereof, and access device to provide tremendous amounts of
personal/business information which were used in a fraudulent way to fraud for
monies and obstruction of justice in connection thereof.
To include defendant(s) collective said
wrongful abuse of the computer fraud and abuse act to provide fraudulent public
and court records
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent
Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding Practices, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of
action(s) to take advantage of the Plaintiff economic status; to include but
not limited to
7.
Cause of action for each said described
Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit
to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious
Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under
(RICO Statue), (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material
facts in public records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s)
to take advantage of because of the Plaintiff education status;
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving
the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of,
take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively
deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination, & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of
a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice, (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal
rights of others similar situated as the same race as the Plaintiff herein
(African American)
And or those similar minorities persons cover
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include but not limited to
all person/persons cover against such Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination
& Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction
of Justice, Legal Malpractice & False oaths and claims under (RICO) statue,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s)
The Defendant(s) collectively being most all
(Attorneys at law) no less calculated and orchestrated primarily and then
prepared and directed, participated collectively each to committing each said
“extreme and outrageous” acts and actions bases upon Plaintiff race,
disability, economic & educations status to take advantage of the Interest
of (Christ) for a scheme In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus
sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround
area’
& then further said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively
further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s
action to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property
belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
;
8.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving
the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of,
take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively
deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a
civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal
rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein as a
Mental disable person and or a other person/person(s) cover under (ADA)
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
9.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving
the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of,
take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively
deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious
Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil
tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of
“others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of
others economic status;
10.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles
Hamilton II, respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take
Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each
defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a
civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial
Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of
others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others
education status; to include but not limited to;
11.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of
material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices in the
capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a
judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even
deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant
(Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of
officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of
Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make
plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the
legal right(s) of the Plaintiff, and others similarly situated the same as the
Plaintiff, to include but not limited to;
12.
All defendant herein Collectively united in a
Conspiracy to execute several sham’s of a well devised charade, deception(s),
façade, con’s, act(s), and bogus sham(s) structure to wrongfully gain and or
conspiracy to commit theft, and divided Fund of “Federal Funded programs”
designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly
pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand
Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest in "A day center
providing hot meals, clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry
services, and case management to people living on the streets of Houston."
To include but not limited “ungodly pilferage”
federal funds for Homeless Youth Street Outreach Project which
this program provides case management and
licensed mental health counseling services to homeless youth living in the
Houston area.
To include but not limited to “ungodly
pilferage” federal Funds for;
Brigid’s Hope
This program provides transitional housing and
supportive services to homeless women who have left the Texas prison or jail
system. The goal of Brigid's Hope is to reduce the number of women returning to
the criminal justice system by giving women the tools needed to become
self-sufficient and to secure a safe and productive life.
To include but not limited to “ungodly
pilferage” Federal funds for;
Cathedral Justice Project
The Cathedral Justice Project provides
pro-bono legal services to Houston’s street community. To include but not
limited to “ungodly pilferage federal funds for;
Cathedral Clinic
This clinic combines primary health care and
psychiatric treatment/mental health counseling with intensive case management
to address the unique needs of men, women and children living on Houston’s
streets
By all-above identified Defendants herein
cartel, syndicate & combine together in a well “Legal organization” to
master mind such collective hostile acts and actions of deceitful, fake,
counterfeit sham of fraudulent Misrepresentation(s), of a infamous, notorious
fashion
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and
bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and
surround area’
& then further said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively
further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to
get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to
“Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
In which all was done in a hostile civil tort
fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff not limited to other factors
In that the Defendant (Arthur) and
Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their “Professional
legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law no less, in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to; all
defendant(s) herein acting in full performance recital, and concert to
collectively attempt to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve
property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral”.
Which the Plaintiff will further be
able to respectfully & “Honestly” provide a lethal compiling of evidence
showing venomous contempt of how each and every defendant described herein
“Did not” at any time frame past nor
present or future take separate efforts to decline, refuse, repudiate, rebuff,
reject, make a effort, file a official protest and simply put just “say no” to
their well executed gluttonous, greedy, materialistic individual described
rolls in carrying out as a organization(s) of “cut throats buccaneers”
counselors of law;
To include but not limited to each
defendant(s) organization of “Ill-Legal Eagles” jointly holding steadfast to;
13.
A further sham of a well devise charade,
deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to Committing in
Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of “Private
Donation & Charitable” funded programs designated for “Christ Church
Cathedral”
Each defendants herein sought to
“ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty
Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff self interest by Defendants
collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham
And fraudulent Misrepresentation in a sham of
a well devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure
to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding
area’
Then finally from said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile
take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property
belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
To the extent the Defendant(s) collectively
willing to take such legal calculated measures in “court room drama” &
“media exposure” risk(s).
In which all was done in such a “Civil Tort”
hostile fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff,
14.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving
the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware
of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to
wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of Federal Funded programs
Designated for the self interest of others
similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein by Defendants collective acts
and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent
Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others
similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein
15.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving
the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware
of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to
wrongfully gain
And or commit to conspiracy of theft of
Private Donation & charitable funds programs designated for the self
interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff by Defendants
collective acts
And actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit
sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal
right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein to
include but not limited to all defendants herein committed acts and actions of
as listed additionally in paragraph (16) below;
16.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that
each of the Defendant(s) each herein committed in concert, collusion act(s) and
action(s) under the following:
“Malicious Prosecution of a Civil
Tort” for personal monetary gain (with not probable cause and no proper
investigations), (Failure to join all proper Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to the
integrity of the Judicial System and to the State Bar of Texas association
governing Attorney and Counselors in and for the State of Texas disciplinary
codes, the Courts, and to each Attorneys personal fiduciary duty to him/her
self professional code of ethics, To wit: each Defendant (s) acted out in a
total disregard for such a professional standard of legal care and each did in
fact breach their fiduciary duty;
Obstruction of Justice by way of preventing
the honest flow of the truth, corruptly or influences, obstructs, or impedes,
or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede in the truth in all manner
surrounding “materials facts” during a judicial proceeding filed in
Defendant(s) “Tort” in its entire fashion;
And “obstruction of justice” in Defendant(s),
(Arthur) reply to Plaintiff “Interrogatories and request for admission
questions” in regards to actual “owner ship” of the deposition conducted on
Defendant (Arthur), by claiming Attorney-client privileges and work product
doctrine.
Perjury in the presentation of all material
facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial
dire situation,
Fraud upon a Judicial Proceeding and fraud
upon the courts,
Fraud in the suppression of truth to deceive
all material facts during a legal Judicial Proceeding before an Honorable
District Court of Law
In which all was done against the legal civil
protected right(s) of the Plaintiff
17.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court
further each defendant Identified above is civilly require to be also charge in
Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption
Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other
fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of, in which all
was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
18.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each
defendant identified above is civilly required to be also charge Assisting and
“participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing” to commit (RICO)
Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit
other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of’
In which all was done against the
legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
19.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable
U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect,
perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively
deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to
20.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of
material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices under (RICO)
statue,
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the
Defendant(s) willfully, wanton, and aggressively committed collectively “Mail
Fraud & Wire Fraud” for the defendant desire scheme of things in violation
of and completely under (RICO) statue
To wit: each said described defendant(s)
herein commit to Falsifying false material facts in a “Tort” for Harris County
District Court records in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to all public
records, media broadcast records (Both in print form and Live Video and
“Internet publications), and all judicial proceeding records and documentations
there involved in said multiple “Mail & Wire Fraud scheme and pattern in a
charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote,
lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively
further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to
get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ
Church Cathedral for personal future gain
Which said “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme of
things also involved to cast the bogus unjust impression of the Plaintiff being
totally:
“Nasty, filthy, grimy, grubby, dirty,
rude, immoral, indecent, smutty, soiled, mucky, stupid, slow, brainless, dim,
unintelligent, unwise, foolish, silly, daft, deprived, meager, destitute,
impoverished, penniless & poor before the National Public News to carry the
defendants collective scheme of things to first “Ungodly pilferage Fund of
“Federal Funded programs” “Private funded programs and (Christ) congregations
donations designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to
“ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty
Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest, then
defendants collective scheme of things was to next use said “Mail and Wire
Fraud”
To devalue the property of (“Christ”),
and all of the real estate in the surrounding downtown Houston, Texas area in a
“Hostile Real estate development/take over” scheme to include devalue of all
property in the area for the future Interest Especially of the Defendant
(Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) Interest (Marine Building L.L.C. et al)
development;
To include but not limited to
misrepresentation of all material facts in this “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme in
regards to defendants financial business records, endurance, continued
existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a
Legal Judicial proceeding
In which all was done while in the Defendant
(Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting “Professional
legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law, in and for the State of Texas, against the
legal right(s) of the Plaintiff and “others similar situated” as the same race,
disability, education status, and poverty status as the Plaintiff herein.
21.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable
U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect,
perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to in
addition of all of the above, also Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort for
personal wrongful fraudulent gain, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Obstruction of
Justice, Perjury, Fraud of a Judicial Proceeding & Fraud upon the court, in
which all was done also against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated”
as the same as the Plaintiff herein.
22.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable
U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect,
perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Aiding
and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other
fraud(s), in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar
situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
23.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable
U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect,
perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to
Assisting and participating to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption
Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit
other fraud(s) in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar
situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
24.
With Plaintiff respectfully stating before the
Honorable Court a further cause of actions against all defendant(s) for
Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress and Mental Anguish,
Punitive/exemplary awards, declaratory
judgment, special, consequential, incidental, excess, actual, compensatory,
discretionary, necessary, proximate, non-pecuniary, future,
And treble damages being levy against each
described defendant herein under (RICO) Statue; with full Interest incurred
from date of injury throughout both (pre and post) judgments;
For all of which each defendant herein
collectively inspire to achieve in an extreme, offensive, contemptible,
despicable and outrageous nature which is of a civil/criminal shameful
notoriety shocking inexplicable type nature committed against the legal rights
of the Plaintiff
In which said Plaintiff never did at any time
frame both past and present, “bring about”, “trigger” or being a source of
provoke of probable cause
To render such proximate injury to cause the
defendant(s) collectively to act against the Plaintiff with such force’ and
Reasoning that the Plaintiff being held
accountable for the defendant(s) initially and collectively to take such
aggravated, inflamed and incited acts, actions, and circumstances of ill-deeds
directed at the Plaintiff in a devised charade, deception, façade, con, act,
and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ)
property and surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well
devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to
depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’
and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile
take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property
belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
25.
Parties
Pro Se Plaintiff
Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American
Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen
protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And also minorities
persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary
State of Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225
26.
Defendant
Harry C. Arthur Esq.
A Houston Personal Injury Attorney
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77002
Advertisement states:
CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES!
27.
Co- Defendant(s)
Law offices of Harry C. Arthur
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas
77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury
Attorney) suite 200
Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200
Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200
Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite
200
Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200
Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200
28.
Co- Defendant(s)
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200
(Tenants)
1.AA Quick Bond suite 100
2.Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101
3.Lacey’s Deli
4.Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102
5.Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103
6.Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200
7.The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite
300
8.The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal
suite 300
9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300
10.Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)
11.Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration
Attorney) suite 300
12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite
300
13.Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite
300
14.F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney)
suite 300
15.Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite
300
16.Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit
300
29.
Jurisdiction
The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
Respectfully Asserts the above Honorable U.S. District Court has proper
Jurisdiction venue over all subject matters involving Federal Question(s); in
which the (Government) is not a party.
The amount of monetary fund’s in controversy
exceed the Jurisdictional limits of $75,000.00,
30.
Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Honorable
U.S. District Court has subject matter Federal Jurisdiction over all Matters
involving:
Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18,
United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization
Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section
1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of
justice), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 152 (relating to
concealment of assets; false oaths and claims
"Enterprise" is defined to include
"any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity, and union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a
legal entity."
Violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
(CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030, to knowingly accessing a protected computer with the
intent to defraud and there by obtaining anything of value and knowingly and
with the intent to defraud, trafficking in a password or similar information
through which a computer may be accessed without authorization;
Violation under Title VII has been
supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy, age, and disability
discrimination; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).
Violations of The Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964 prohibit Discrimination base
upon race, age, gender and sexual orientation
With further committed combine Violations of
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986
To include but not limited to all defendants
herein collectively in concert, conspire, and committed: Actual Fraud,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding,
Fraud upon the court and the Public through the Media
Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney
of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a
judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even
deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant
(Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of
officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of
Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make
plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the
legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
To include hostile Discriminatory, Invidious
Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil
tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial
preceding with Misrepresentation of all material facts therein a “Tort” in
regards to defendant’s collective “financial business/personal survival,
endurance thereof, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible
financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding to include
(Aggravated Perjury), knowingly premeditated
and intentionally committed, conspire together to organizes, act together,
collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and Abetting, Assisting and
participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing to commit among other things
Fraud against the dignity & rights of the
Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
And take the Plaintiff name in a manner to
cheat all legal interest in (Christ) for the Defendant “Master Fraudulent
Plans”.
Venue.
31.
Venue is proper before the Honorable Southern
District of Texas U.S. District Court in that all parties reside within Harris
County, Houston Texas when all incident(s) as described herein occurred.
All defendant(s) in their individual persons
and their places of Professional business are located within Harris County,
Houston Texas;
32.
Fact(s).
“Houston we have a Problem”…!
Chapter I
(“Hostile Take Over”)
To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis
Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein
before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration
under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before
Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:
The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s)
hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)
And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.)
instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming
the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to
shut down (Christ);
Which capture “News Head lines” as breaking
news story local and nation wide through transmitting via device such as
newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town”
“USA” and the Defendant “Sir Arthur C. Harry Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put
a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff to boot.
33.
Media Coverage
Lawsuit aims to shut down homeless shelter in
downtown Houston
by khou.com staff
khou.com
Posted on December 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM
HOUSTON—A homeless shelter in downtown Houston
is fighting attempts to shut it down.
The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run
by Christ Church Cathedral.
An attorney who works in a building across the
street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to
close The Beacon for good.
On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally
of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything or is it?
No comments:
Post a Comment