Saturday, November 21, 2015

Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition)


                                                          62.

(Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein U.S. Civil Action,

 

Hamilton v. United States of America et al

Defendant: United States of America, State Of Texas and Harris County Texas

Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II Case Number: 1:2011cv00122

Filed: March 9, 2011 Court: Texas Eastern District Court

Office: Beaumont Office County: Jefferson

Presiding Judge: Marcia A. Crone Referring Judge: Keith F. Giblin

Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Cause of Action: 28:1983 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

                                                            63.

A lawyer who owns an office building located near The Beacon, a day center for homeless people in downtown Houston, filed a suit Monday seeking a permanent injunction to shut down the operation on the ground it’s a “private nuisance.”

Lawyer Harry C. Arthur seeks a minimum of $250,000 in damages from defendants Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate him for the loss of rentals in his building and the loss of its market value.


Officially “Christ Church Cathedral” a homeless soup kitchen being sued by “Law office of Harry C. Arthur

Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. Address: 1305 Prairie St # 200, Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (713) 224-7996 for $250,000 U.S. Dollars

            And all of the “Homeless” Houston Texas Street people including (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 herein

Being officially “Affirm”, by the

            Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” (Houston Division)  and their Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” Henchmen”,

“Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals”, legally,

 I present to “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague and

The Entire “International Community”, to all be residing in (America) forever as “Derelicts” upon which, as described in the Media

            Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a state court suit in

November 2009 seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation in downtown Houston that provides meals, counseling and laundry service for homeless people.

 In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and

The Marine Building, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center.

Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million from Lawyer, Building

Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, Texas Lawyer

 January 11, 2010”

Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202437766999/Homeless-Man-Seeks-24-Million-From-Lawyer-Building#ixzz3s9Zn8ouf

 

“HOUSTON A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it down.

The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.

An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.

On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything they can to keep The Beacon open.

People of Christ Church Cathedral have been on this corner for 170 years actually on this corner right across the street trying to take care of the poor and the needy and the homeless. That s the Christian admonition, that s the mission of the cathedral and of The Beacon and we don t intend to be shut down, Andy Vickery, attorney for The Beacon, said.

In his lawsuit, attorney Harry C. Arthur, described the people who use the shelter as derelicts and said their presence has cost him business.”

            http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/11/11264294/

                                                                        64.

(Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare” legally, furtherance’s herein

“Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857),

Making for exactly (156) exact “ungodly corrupted judicial racial bias years of being denied legal (Negro) race status standing to proceed before any

 Federal Court of Laws, on laws “Dealing” with among required judicial duties of the Deep Dark Ages Defendant in coming about

 Fair play in “equity”, concerning (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), being abducted, there after the filing of this civil action, against Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law

And falsely in 2011 “Criminally Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) upon which the Deep Dark ages Defendant “United States of America” (Houston Division) ,

State of Texas, Harris County, Houston Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”, and City of Houston Texas (Police Dept.) Property Division 1202 Washington Ave. Houston Texas upon finally releasing (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)

Criminal engage further in the absolute Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing

In American civil procedure, the 100% work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket Number

Hamilton v. United States of America et al decisions or orders for this case

Filed: December 15, 2010 as 1:2010cv00808

Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II

Defendant: United States of America, Andrew Johnson

Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court

Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations

Filed: April 17, 2012 as 12-40403

Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of all other African American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America

Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President, RUTHERFORD B. HAYES

Court: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Type: Other Statutes RICO


Criminal engage furtherance’s  in the absolute Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing

In American civil procedure, the 100% work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket Number

Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant:

LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II

Defendant - Appellee:

HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G. JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R. TREJO, SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY, CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND, MIKE COX'S BAIL SVC, LACEY'S DELI, JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK THERING, RING INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL, DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-GARCIA, MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F. M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA MARTINEZ and ALLEN J. GUIDRY

Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO


The official deposition of Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, further all legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer bag, and the VIP “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, which do exist as

“We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition) file to “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague exhibit (A)

“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) dated August 15th 2011, whom pursuant to Civil No. 4:10-CV-2709,

“The Vickery Law Firm” provided the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein legal deposition upon which said legal deposition being stolen from me  (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) in 2011

  “The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, all of which

“Proclaim” as this very undersigned “Notary Seal Date” being official in the Year of 2015 of the Lord,

Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein being kidnaped in 2011, and theft of his property, all to protect Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” and His (RICO) scheme of things involving a

Downtown (CBD) building belong to the “official” site of “President The “Sam Houston” of the Republic of Texas…..

Upon which as of this undersigned notary sealed date (Building) just sit there in years of “Decay” as all parties involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church Cathedral”

A Homeless soup kitchen for $250,000 U.S. Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of thing to erect a $20s plus (Millions) newer building,

Upon which Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after released from “false Imprisonment”, thereafter 2011

The (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein having no legal standing in 2011- 2099 to appear before a Federal Court of Law, as described in the “Complaint” as follows below in paragraph 65

Or to legally proceed in 2015-2016 for the entire criminal (RICO) kidnapping, abduction and theft of property acts as being described above in paragraph 62-64:

                                                            65.

United States District Court

 Southern District of Texas

 Houston Division

 Louis Charles Hamilton II

 Pro Se Plaintiff Complaint

 Jury Demand

 Vs.

 Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)

 Defendant

 Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al

 Co- Defendant(s)

 Marine Building, L.L.C. et al

 Co-Defendant(s)

 1.

 Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby files a Complaint with the above Honorable Court and for Cause of Action(s)”

The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all facts as follows:

 2.

 The Plaintiff seeks cause of actions for each described Defendant(s) Herein knowing, wanton, licentious, and immoral intentionally committed, conspire, prepare or directed and orchestrated,

 Primarily all extreme and outrageous acts and actions in conscious disregards for Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of the Plaintiff

 3.

 To include but not limited to each said defendant(s) Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Defendant, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al, Co- Defendant(s) and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al, Co-Defendant(s) herein knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organize, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and abetting , Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing,

 And orchestrated primarily all extreme unprovoked, and outrageous acts and actions described herein with a total conscious disregards for (among other things) Violations by said defendant(s) being committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein;

 4.

 With further cause of actions Plaintiff will show giving rise to this Honorable U.S. District Court Civil suit filed by the said Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,

 For each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,

 Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial proceeding with Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding , (Aggravated Perjury),

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a Texas Honorable District Court, among other cause of actions;

 All dedicated, devoted and committed against the Plaintiff legal rights as a United States Citizen base primarily because of the Plaintiff race of African American, and base also solely because of Plaintiff Disability, economic & education status

 In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, bogus sham structure to downgrade & depreciate first the property belong to (Christ) and the surrounding area,

 Then second this scheme of the Defendant(s) collectively shamelessly sought to impose permanent closure on the property of (Christ),

 Then their after said civil malicious tort having been put into effect, impose and enforce on the property belong to (Christ)

 Defendant(s) collectively further sought to apply if needed further full/semi- Hostile course, approach, ploy, device, maneuver and tactic to take further over of the property of (Christ) and to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & )achieve property belonging to (Christ Church Cathedral Beacon operation) in Houston Texas (here after name and all interest thereof) (“Christ”.)…(

For each defendant(s) herein financial gain in a “New Retrofitted Legal” office complex & expansion of a Deli”

With the division of all of the ill-gotten pilferage of (Christ) federal, private, donated, funds in excess of $250,000.00 dollars Defendant (Arthur) finally makes with his majority share needed building repairs by way of Painting”,

And finally after “(3) SOME PLUS” years defendant (Arthur) finally can afford to pay to clean the “Mummified human waste (Crap) matter of platter stains on the “Marine Building L.L.C.” on a “National Historic Property” sight in Houston Texas

 And or alternatively the Plaintiff will show quite easy to the Honorable Court that the “Chief Organizer” & designer of the “Malicious Civil Tort” and all Fraudulent material facts involved therein;

 Defendant (Arthur) having some other hidden third party conglomerate real estate developer(s) company(s) in the waiting position ranks to further take over the property of (Christ) with profits distribution, sharing, and benefit(s) in favor of all the Defendants collectively herein in some form or manner as this organization precisely agreed upon;

 With the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) collectively finally having the Professional Ruthless legal repute reputation of having shut down (Christ) at the expense of (Christ) and the Plaintiff and other similar the same as the Plaintiff

 And (Arthur) gluttonous, greedy materialistic pockets are effusive abundantly & fully line with gold.

 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff was held secretly against & in opposition to his will, and was to be required in the full participation of victimizations of all numerous phases in order that all of the defendant(s) entire collectively scheme of things was enforced up to the point the Plaintiff being evicted wrongfully from (Christ) and the final scheme of things move forward as plan.

 5.

 Plaintiff herein file for a Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively wrongful, deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage because of the Plaintiff is a mental disable person or a persons cover under (ADA) American with disability act; to include but not limited to

 6.

 Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue with false oaths and claims to aid in the scam of the defendant(s) as describing herein this complaint under (RICO) statue,

 To include but not limited to the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant did in fact commit collective violation(s) of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (as amended 1994 and 1996) for fraudulent wide spread media coverage in connection with a “Financial crime”, conspiracy in connection thereof, unauthorized access and fraudulent providing false and misleading “Material Facts Through a protected computer” Media Computer(s), “Internet”, public records and all court: txed via-

All judicial records & Media records, recordings thereof, and access device to provide tremendous amounts of personal/business information which were used in a fraudulent way to fraud for monies and obstruction of justice in connection thereof.

 To include defendant(s) collective said wrongful abuse of the computer fraud and abuse act to provide fraudulent public and court records

 (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of the Plaintiff economic status; to include but not limited to

 7.

 Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO Statue), (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records and media,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of because of the Plaintiff education status;

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment

 And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination, & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated as the same race as the Plaintiff herein (African American)

 And or those similar minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include but not limited to all person/persons cover against such Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice & False oaths and claims under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court, among other wrongful cause of action(s)

 The Defendant(s) collectively being most all (Attorneys at law) no less calculated and orchestrated primarily and then prepared and directed, participated collectively each to committing each said “extreme and outrageous” acts and actions bases upon Plaintiff race, disability, economic & educations status to take advantage of the Interest of (Christ) for a scheme In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’

& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property

 With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s action to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.

 ;

 8.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment

 And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein as a Mental disable person and or a other person/person(s) cover under (ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

 9.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others economic status;

 10.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment

 And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein base because of others education status; to include but not limited to;

 11.

 Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,

 Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas

 In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff, and others similarly situated the same as the Plaintiff, to include but not limited to;

 12.

 All defendant herein Collectively united in a Conspiracy to execute several sham’s of a well devised charade, deception(s), façade, con’s, act(s), and bogus sham(s) structure to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft, and divided Fund of “Federal Funded programs” designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest in "A day center providing hot meals, clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry services, and case management to people living on the streets of Houston."

 To include but not limited “ungodly pilferage” federal funds for Homeless Youth Street Outreach Project which

 this program provides case management and licensed mental health counseling services to homeless youth living in the Houston area.

 To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” federal Funds for;

 Brigid’s Hope

 This program provides transitional housing and supportive services to homeless women who have left the Texas prison or jail system. The goal of Brigid's Hope is to reduce the number of women returning to the criminal justice system by giving women the tools needed to become self-sufficient and to secure a safe and productive life.

 To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” Federal funds for;

 Cathedral Justice Project

 The Cathedral Justice Project provides pro-bono legal services to Houston’s street community. To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage federal funds for;

 Cathedral Clinic

 This clinic combines primary health care and psychiatric treatment/mental health counseling with intensive case management to address the unique needs of men, women and children living on Houston’s streets

 By all-above identified Defendants herein cartel, syndicate & combine together in a well “Legal organization” to master mind such collective hostile acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham of fraudulent Misrepresentation(s), of a infamous, notorious fashion

 In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’

& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property

 With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.

 In which all was done in a hostile civil tort fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff not limited to other factors

 In that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law no less, in and for the State of Texas,

 To include but not limited to; all defendant(s) herein acting in full performance recital, and concert to collectively attempt to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral”.

Which the Plaintiff will further be able to respectfully & “Honestly” provide a lethal compiling of evidence showing venomous contempt of how each and every defendant described herein

“Did not” at any time frame past nor present or future take separate efforts to decline, refuse, repudiate, rebuff, reject, make a effort, file a official protest and simply put just “say no” to their well executed gluttonous, greedy, materialistic individual described rolls in carrying out as a organization(s) of “cut throats buccaneers” counselors of law;

 To include but not limited to each defendant(s) organization of “Ill-Legal Eagles” jointly holding steadfast to;

 13.

 A further sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to Committing in Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of “Private Donation & Charitable” funded programs designated for “Christ Church Cathedral”

Each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff self interest by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham

 And fraudulent Misrepresentation in a sham of a well devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property

 With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.

 To the extent the Defendant(s) collectively willing to take such legal calculated measures in “court room drama” & “media exposure” risk(s).

 In which all was done in such a “Civil Tort” hostile fashion against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff,

 14.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of Federal Funded programs

 Designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein

 15.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain

 And or commit to conspiracy of theft of Private Donation & charitable funds programs designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff by Defendants collective acts

 And actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein to include but not limited to all defendants herein committed acts and actions of as listed additionally in paragraph (16) below;

 16.

 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each of the Defendant(s) each herein committed in concert, collusion act(s) and action(s) under the following:

“Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort” for personal monetary gain (with not probable cause and no proper investigations), (Failure to join all proper Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’)

Breach of Fiduciary Duty to the integrity of the Judicial System and to the State Bar of Texas association governing Attorney and Counselors in and for the State of Texas disciplinary codes, the Courts, and to each Attorneys personal fiduciary duty to him/her self professional code of ethics, To wit: each Defendant (s) acted out in a total disregard for such a professional standard of legal care and each did in fact breach their fiduciary duty;

 Obstruction of Justice by way of preventing the honest flow of the truth, corruptly or influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede in the truth in all manner surrounding “materials facts” during a judicial proceeding filed in Defendant(s) “Tort” in its entire fashion;

 And “obstruction of justice” in Defendant(s), (Arthur) reply to Plaintiff “Interrogatories and request for admission questions” in regards to actual “owner ship” of the deposition conducted on Defendant (Arthur), by claiming Attorney-client privileges and work product doctrine.

 Perjury in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial dire situation,

 Fraud upon a Judicial Proceeding and fraud upon the courts,

 Fraud in the suppression of truth to deceive all material facts during a legal Judicial Proceeding before an Honorable District Court of Law

 In which all was done against the legal civil protected right(s) of the Plaintiff

 17.

 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court further each defendant Identified above is civilly require to be also charge in Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;

 And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff

 18.

 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant identified above is civilly required to be also charge Assisting and “participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing” to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;

 And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning cover up their of’

In which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff

 19.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to

 20.

 Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Legal Malpractices under (RICO) statue,

 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) willfully, wanton, and aggressively committed collectively “Mail Fraud & Wire Fraud” for the defendant desire scheme of things in violation of and completely under (RICO) statue

 To wit: each said described defendant(s) herein commit to Falsifying false material facts in a “Tort” for Harris County District Court records in and for the State of Texas,

 To include but not limited to all public records, media broadcast records (Both in print form and Live Video and “Internet publications), and all judicial proceeding records and documentations there involved in said multiple “Mail & Wire Fraud scheme and pattern in a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’

& then further said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on (Christ) property

 With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral for personal future gain

 Which said “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme of things also involved to cast the bogus unjust impression of the Plaintiff being totally:

“Nasty, filthy, grimy, grubby, dirty, rude, immoral, indecent, smutty, soiled, mucky, stupid, slow, brainless, dim, unintelligent, unwise, foolish, silly, daft, deprived, meager, destitute, impoverished, penniless & poor before the National Public News to carry the defendants collective scheme of things to first “Ungodly pilferage Fund of “Federal Funded programs” “Private funded programs and (Christ) congregations donations designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest, then defendants collective scheme of things was to next use said “Mail and Wire Fraud”

To devalue the property of (“Christ”), and all of the real estate in the surrounding downtown Houston, Texas area in a “Hostile Real estate development/take over” scheme to include devalue of all property in the area for the future Interest Especially of the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) Interest (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) development;

 To include but not limited to misrepresentation of all material facts in this “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme in regards to defendants financial business records, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial proceeding

 In which all was done while in the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law, in and for the State of Texas, against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff and “others similar situated” as the same race, disability, education status, and poverty status as the Plaintiff herein.

 21.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to in addition of all of the above, also Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort for personal wrongful fraudulent gain, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Obstruction of Justice, Perjury, Fraud of a Judicial Proceeding & Fraud upon the court, in which all was done also against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein.

 22.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;

 And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s), in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.

 23.

 With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein committed to Assisting and participating to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;

 And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.

 24.

 With Plaintiff respectfully stating before the Honorable Court a further cause of actions against all defendant(s) for Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress and Mental Anguish,

 Punitive/exemplary awards, declaratory judgment, special, consequential, incidental, excess, actual, compensatory, discretionary, necessary, proximate, non-pecuniary, future,

 And treble damages being levy against each described defendant herein under (RICO) Statue; with full Interest incurred from date of injury throughout both (pre and post) judgments;

 For all of which each defendant herein collectively inspire to achieve in an extreme, offensive, contemptible, despicable and outrageous nature which is of a civil/criminal shameful notoriety shocking inexplicable type nature committed against the legal rights of the Plaintiff

 In which said Plaintiff never did at any time frame both past and present, “bring about”, “trigger” or being a source of provoke of probable cause

 To render such proximate injury to cause the defendant(s) collectively to act against the Plaintiff with such force’ and

 Reasoning that the Plaintiff being held accountable for the defendant(s) initially and collectively to take such aggravated, inflamed and incited acts, actions, and circumstances of ill-deeds directed at the Plaintiff in a devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’

Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property

 With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.

 25.

 Parties

 Pro Se Plaintiff

 Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And also minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225

 26.

 Defendant

 Harry C. Arthur Esq.

 A Houston Personal Injury Attorney

 1305 Prairie Street Suite 200

 Houston, Texas 77002

 Advertisement states:

 CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES!

 27.

 Co- Defendant(s)

 Law offices of Harry C. Arthur

 1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002

 

 Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury Attorney) suite 200

 Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200

 Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200

 Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200

 Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200

 Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200

 28.

 Co- Defendant(s)

 Marine Building, L.L.C. et al

 1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002

 Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200

 (Tenants)

 1.AA Quick Bond suite 100

 2.Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101

 3.Lacey’s Deli

 4.Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102

 5.Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103

 6.Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200

 7.The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300

 8.The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300

 9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300

 10.Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)

 11.Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300

 12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

 13.Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300

 14.F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

 15.Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

 16.Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300

 

 29.

 Jurisdiction

 The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully Asserts the above Honorable U.S. District Court has proper Jurisdiction venue over all subject matters involving Federal Question(s); in which the (Government) is not a party.

 The amount of monetary fund’s in controversy exceed the Jurisdictional limits of $75,000.00,

 30.

 Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Honorable U.S. District Court has subject matter Federal Jurisdiction over all Matters involving:

 Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization

 Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 152 (relating to concealment of assets; false oaths and claims

 "Enterprise" is defined to include "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity."

 Violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030, to knowingly accessing a protected computer with the intent to defraud and there by obtaining anything of value and knowingly and with the intent to defraud, trafficking in a password or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization;

 Violation under Title VII has been supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy, age, and disability discrimination; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).

 Violations of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964 prohibit Discrimination base upon race, age, gender and sexual orientation

 With further committed combine Violations of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986

 To include but not limited to all defendants herein collectively in concert, conspire, and committed: Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court proceeding, Fraud upon the court and the Public through the Media

 Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under (RICO) statue,

 Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas

 In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff

 To include hostile Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,

 Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial preceding with Misrepresentation of all material facts therein a “Tort” in regards to defendant’s collective “financial business/personal survival, endurance thereof, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding to include

 (Aggravated Perjury), knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to organizes, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and Abetting, Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing to commit among other things

 Fraud against the dignity & rights of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,

 And take the Plaintiff name in a manner to cheat all legal interest in (Christ) for the Defendant “Master Fraudulent Plans”.

Venue.

 31.

 Venue is proper before the Honorable Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court in that all parties reside within Harris County, Houston Texas when all incident(s) as described herein occurred.

 All defendant(s) in their individual persons and their places of Professional business are located within Harris County, Houston Texas;

 32.

 Fact(s).

“Houston we have a Problem”…!

Chapter I

 (“Hostile Take Over”)

 

To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:

 The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)

 And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to shut down (Christ);

 Which capture “News Head lines” as breaking news story local and nation wide through transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Sir Arthur C. Harry Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff to boot.

 33.

 Media Coverage

 Lawsuit aims to shut down homeless shelter in downtown Houston

 by khou.com staff

 khou.com

 Posted on December 7, 2009 at 6:30 PM

 HOUSTON—A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it down.

 The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.

 An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.

 On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do everything or is it?

                                   

No comments:

Post a Comment