Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II Vs. United States of America et al

                                                          3.

                                                Jurisdiction

Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein, “State”, Declare and Affirm”, before The Honorable Justice”, Justice presiding in the “United States District Court” for The District of Columbia

Jurisdiction is proper before a “United States of America” Federal Court of Law, pursuant to “Defendant” United States of America” on rules of “Governing laws” pursuant to

The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864,

And by the House on January 31, 1865. Claiming being Forced “slavery servitude” is no longer legally require pursuant to said 13th Amendment of the Defendant “United States of America” et al

Which included former slaves recently freed (Now) until the new year of February 7th 2013…?

                                                            4.

Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein, “State”, Declare and Affirm”, before The Honorable Justice”, Justice presiding in the “United States District Court” for The District of Columbia

Jurisdiction is proper before a “United States of America” Federal Court of Law, pursuant to “Defendant” United States of America” on rules of Governing laws

Pursuant to the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868, and granted citizenship to

“all persons born or naturalized in the United States,” which included former slaves recently freed (Now) until the new year of February 7th 2013…?

                                                            5.

Pro Se “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein, “State”, Declare and Affirm”, before The Honorable Justice”, Justice presiding in the “United States District Court” for The District of Columbia

 Jurisdiction is proper before a “United States of America” Federal Court of Law,

 Pursuant to “Defendant” United States of America” on rules of Governing laws Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)

The Defendant “United States of America” and there “Secret White Society Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) from the exactly time frame of 1865-Feburary 7th 2013

 “United States of America” did not even exist at all, in legal factual circumstances it was officially “The State of Mississippi America”.