Cmdr. Bluefin vs.(USA), "State of Texas", "Harris County"," Houston Scrooge Attorney" & "The Hole in the Wall Gang" VI

Pro Se Plaintiff herein state very respectful before the “Honorable Justice”

Co-Defendant “State of Texas, Harris County 215 District Court herein received before the Judicial Business of The Harris County Courthouse

In Houston Texas Facts of the said Pro Se Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) herein Civil Complaint (19) pages on the 22^nd Day of December 2009 * Harris County Texas Docket Records 44157172

                            IX

With Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein filing an attached copy from the “news media” -- Brenda Sapino Jeffreys Texas Lawyers

Description of Pro Se Plaintiff (Hamilton II) “himself” makes his quite very “surprise”

Entry into the “Ring” on this “hotly dispute” & quite “remarkable disgusting” extreme “nasty subject matter” over “Christ Church Cathedral” et al and (The Beacon).

 Being also on “wire” media coverage on Houston 2 News Live…!

Posted “wire 2 Houston News coverage (also) on the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II

Face book “News real” wall.

Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million From Lawyer Over Nuisance Suit

Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a suit seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation that provides meals and services for homeless people, on the grounds that the center is a "private nuisance.

" Louis Charles Hamilton II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 million in damages, alleging that

Arthur "unflinchingly, courageously" and with an "audaciously bold potty mouth" accused people who are fed at the center of being "derelicts," among other things.

Brenda Sapino Jeffreys

Texas Lawyer

01-11-2010

Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a state court suit in November seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation in downtown Houston

That provides meals, counseling and laundry service for homeless people.

In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and The Marine Building, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground it's a "private nuisance."

A month after Arthur filed his suit against defendants Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon, Louis Charles Hamilton II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 million in actual and punitive damages from Arthur

And The Marine Building and an apology from Arthur in a local newspaper for allegations made in Christ Church Cathedral.

In his Dec. 22 petition in Hamilton v. Arthur, et al., Hamilton says he is a veteran of the U.S. Navy who uses services at The Beacon.

Hamilton alleges that in Christ Church Cathedral Arthur and the building "unflinchingly, courageously" and with an "audaciously bold potty mouth"

And a "lost aptitude on life" accused people who are fed at The Beacon of being "derelicts," among other things.

Arthur's petition in Christ Church Cathedral does not mention Hamilton or any specific homeless individuals.

Hamilton alleges the plaintiffs in Christ Church Cathedral seek "ungodly pilferage" from the cathedral for its affiliation with The Beacon.

Hamilton also alleges Arthur and the building have a "twisted heart full of unwashed socks, with a soul full of gunk Grinch type crappie act(s)" because of the petition they filed against the "Holy Church."

Hamilton writes, "The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that at no time did the Plaintiff take a part in pissing, crapping and or vomiting or any other bodily fluid discharge being wrongfully placed at the property of the Defendants."

 Hamilton says he will prove to a judge that he is not a derelict and that Arthur and the building chose to discriminate against him.

In his petition, Hamilton asks 215th District Judge Steven Kirkland to award him $1.8 million in actual damages for defamation, discriminatory practices, emotional distress and mental anguish, $600,000 in punitives and a printed apology.

Hamilton, who came to Houston from Jefferson County in the summer of 2009, says in an interview that if he's successful in winning monetary damages from Arthur and his building, he will share the money with the cathedral.

Hamilton says he has never met Arthur, but is anxious to talk to him in court.

"He ticked me off really bad ... and he's going after the church, and my grandmother was a nun. He disrespected my family by calling me a derelict," Hamilton says.

Hamilton says he is a regular client of The Beacon and while he currently is homeless, he regularly visits a U.S. Veterans Center where he also receives his mail. The veterans center is located near The Beacon and The Marine Building.

Arthur, of the Law Offices of Harry C. Arthur, did not return a telephone call seeking his response to Hamilton's suit. But in a Jan. 5 interview, Arthur said,

"The idea of feeding them and helping them [homeless people] is OK, but I don't think you should do it with everyone around you."

He said the cathedral and The Beacon should assist the homeless somewhere outside Houston's central business district.

Arthur says he receives several nasty e-mails a day about his suit.

BREAK BREAD

In Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving -- Arthur and The Marine Building seek a minimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate them for the loss of rentals in the three-story building and its market value.

Arthur's trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersection from The Beacon. The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, a nonprofit established by the cathedral.

"The humanitarian effort, under most circumstances, would be admirable. However, what started as a good and noble idea, has instead grown and turned into a danger to the health and safety

of others in the adjacent areas and a 'nuisance' to neighboring property owners," the plaintiffs allege in their petition in Christ Church Cathedral.

They allege The Beacon has created a "health hazard" in the area because "persons attracted by the free meals, free laundry and other services, urinate, defecate and drop trash in the street, sidewalks, doorways and other private property areas of the neighbors."

In an Amended Answer filed on Dec. 21, 2009, the cathedral and The Beacon allege The Beacon's services are a "blessing" instead of a nuisance, and its clients are "people who need help" instead of "derelicts," as Arthur and the building allege in Christ Church Cathedral.

The defendants allege that ministering to the needs of the homeless "cannot be a 'nuisance' in the eyes of God, or of the Law."

The Episcopal cathedral and The Beacon seek court findings that The Beacon is not a nuisance and that applying the Texas nuisance law to its activities would be unconstitutional.

In the answer, the cathedral and The Beacon invite Arthur, tenants of his building and others who own property near The Beacon to come to lunch at the homeless center. Arthur says he's not sure if he will accept the invite.

In the first line of their answer, the cathedral and The Beacon cite Matthew 25:40: "In as much as you have done it unto the least of these my brothers and sisters, you have done it to me."

Arnold Anderson "Andy" Vickery, a partner in Vickery, Waldner & Mallia who is defending the cathedral and The Beacon in Christ Church Cathedral, says he hasn't heard from Arthur about the lunch.

Vickery says Hamilton's suit shows that homeless individuals such as Hamilton are offended by the allegations in Arthur's suit against the cathedral and The Beacon.

"It's a very hurtful thing to brand someone else as a derelict," Vickery says.

Another member of the defense team, Andrew T. McKinney IV, a partner in McKinney & Cooper, did not return two telephone messages.

Christ Church Cathedral is set for trial in November before 234th District Judge Reece Rondon.