Black African Americans herein respectfully assert Defendant (The United States of America) Anti-miscegenation laws,

 (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein assert respectfully before the “Honorable Justice” Injury to Personal Reputation, Impeaching Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and Sexual Misconduct

(Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American herein a outstanding cause for actions against the Defendant (The United States of America) in regards to all (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American reputed Injuries sustained to “Personal Reputation attacks, Impeaching Honesty in court of laws, Imputation of Crime, Disease and Sexual Misconduct is to a certain extent extreme

“Defamatory pattern and practices” by the Defendant (The United States of America) in their “Malicious Intermarriage Laws as some described below:

                                    153.

Intermarriage The marriage of a person of Caucasian blood with a Negro, Mongolian, Malay, or Hindu shall be null and void. Arizona

Intermarriage All marriages between a white person and a negro, or between a white person and a person of negro descent to the fourth generation inclusive, are hereby forever prohibited. Florida

Intermarriage It shall be unlawful for a white person to marry anyone except a white person. Any marriage in violation of this section shall be void. Georgia

Intermarriage All marriages between a white person and a negro, or between a white person and a person of negro descent, to the third generation, inclusive, or between a white person and a member of the Malay race; or between the negro and a member of the Malay race; or between a person of Negro descent, to the third generation, inclusive, and a member of the Malay race, are forever prohibited, and shall be void. Maryland

Intermarriage The marriage of a white person with a negro or mulatto or person who shall have one-eighth or more of negro blood, shall be unlawful and void. Mississippi

Intermarriage All marriages between...white persons and negroes or white persons and Mongolians...are prohibited and declared absolutely void...No person having one-eighth part or more of negro blood shall be permitted to marry any white person, nor shall any white person be permitted to marry any negro or person having one-eighth part or more of negro blood. Missouri

Intermarriage All marriages of white persons with Negroes, Mulattos, Mongolians, or Malaya hereafter contracted in the State of Wyoming are and shall be illegal and void. Wyoming

Cohabitation Any negro man and white woman, or any white man and negro woman, who are not married to each other, who shall habitually live in and occupy in the nighttime the same room shall each be punished by imprisonment not exceeding twelve (12) months, or by fine not exceeding five hundred ($500.00) dollars. Florida
                                        154.

(Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein respectfully assert before the “Honorable Justice” Defendant (The United States of America) Anti-miscegenation laws, that enforced racial segregation at the level of marriage and intimate relationships between all of the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein by criminalizing interracial marriage and sometimes also sex between members of (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans and all (White) "races".

                           155.

     (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein respectfully assert before the “Honorable Justice” Defendant (The United States of America) Anti-miscegenation laws,

       Four miscegenation laws were passed in Utah between 1888 and 1953, prohibiting intermarriage between whites and those of African or Asian descent. School segregation was barred in 1895.
      The “Utah” state's miscegenation law was repealed in 1963.
                                   156.
      (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein respectfully “absolutely assert” before the “Honorable Justice”  all legal charge of “pattern and practices” in defamatory accusation, insinuation, and legal law citation of imputation of the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American reputation(s)
       Being involving in such Crime, disease and sexual misconduct is fully and foremost evident in the passage of the  Anti-miscegenation laws, by the Defendant (The United State of America) there after the “Black Codes” law were removed to include but limited to (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Blacks African Americans herein affirm before the “Honorable Justice” the Defendant (The United States of America)  state

 Namely Ohio had enacted Black Laws against the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein in 1804 and 1807 that compelled (Negro) blacks entering the Defendant (The United States of America) state of Ohio to post bond of $500 guaranteeing “good behavior” and to produce a court paper as proof that they were free.

                        157.

Prompting (all) Negro Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American herein from the passage of slavery time to this very undersign date well place “high admiration” and having a “loving high regard” for Canada

With the “appreciate” true Canadian unselfish offer of a “safe home” from the “Governor” for all (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein.

And a “firm message” "Tell the “Republicans” on your side of the line that we “Royalists” do not know men by their color.

Should you come to us you will be entitled to all the privileges of the rest of His Majesty's subjects."  J

                                        158.

      (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African American herein “affirm and establish” before the “Honorable Justice” the Defendant (The United States of America) Anti-miscegenation laws, 1865 “Black Codes and later “Jim Crow laws”

Fully instituted against the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein was used also as a main drafting profile outline for These Nuremberg Laws, German legislation policies of 1933-1940

 To single out one race being described as inferior for all aspect in discrimination advantages to be effective it was essential to have a clear definition of who was or was not a Jew.

This was one important function of the “Nuremberg laws” and the numerous supplementary decrees that were proclaimed to further them.

                                      159.
         (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans state for the “Honorable Justice clear facts The Reich Citizenship Law had little practical effect as it deprived German Jews only of the right to “vote and hold office”
         Same as the Defendant (The United States of America) “Black codes” mandate and made exclusive against the (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein in regards to also “vote and hold office” to secure Defendant (The United States of America) “White Supremacy

         To include but not limited to the Defendant (The United States of America) acknowledge to established all (Negro) Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s) Black African Americans herein as inferior human subjects, very substandard and complete low-grade in familiarity relationships of intimacy between (Negro) and superior (White).