Fucked up Law firm @ Harry C. Arthur Esq. & The Hole in the Wall Gang"

In The District Court

                        215^th Judicial District

Harris County, Texas

                        Civil No. 2009-80663

Louis Charles Hamilton II

                        Plaintiff

                Vs.

Harry C. Arthur

Marine Building L.L.C. ET, al

                        Defendant(s)

              Plaintiff first set of Interrogatories                

        TO: Harry C. Arthur Esq.

        Comes Now the Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby appearing as the Pro Se Plaintiff in this Cause No. 2009-80663 above,

Filed the following “First Set of Interrogatories” Document(s) propounded by the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, pursuant to (Rule 197 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure

And require Defendant(s) (Harry C. Arthur) and Co-Defendants the Marine Building L.L.C. hereafter name (Arthur) to respond accordingly as required by Law.

Interrogatories Question No.1

Defendant (Arthur) State exactly with certain full details what was Plaintiff to this action (Hamilton) “exact physical involvement”

Was in the details of being at a state of being a Derelict of Houston Texas and a Nuisances in connection thereof;

And described Plaintiff full involvement in all of the activities as described by (Arthur) in the complaint in details;

 Which Defendant(s) (Arthur) described in detail in a complaint Cause No. 2009-75693 filed in Harris County, Texas “Court House of Law” in Houston, Texas

 And Further their being made of public record and broadcast through local T.V. news media, local News Papers Throughout Houston Texas area

To include but not limited to Plaintiff Being broadcast throughout The “Internet”

 (Among other News information agency) providing said information to their viewers in regards to (Arthur) Statement of the Plaintiff being a Derelict of Houston Texas. 

        Interrogatories Question No. 2

        Defendant (Arthur) State exactly with full details and computation(s) to support facts how that the United States recent financial markets collapse/crunch and the World financial collapse/deficits/crunch in concert thereof

         And loss property values and other economic shortfalls like Fannie Mae, and a drop in the commercial real estate values herewith in the United States has not affect the;

a.  Marine Building L.L.C. Commercial Property/Business of the Defendant (Arthur) herein Houston, Texas

b.  Law Office of Harry C. Arthur Esq.

c.   Harry C. Arthur (Personally);

d.  Harry C. Arthur (Family).

        Interrogatories Question No. 3

        Defendant (Arthur) State exactly what physical evidences the Defendant(s) (Arthur) has in possession, custody, and control that implicate the Plaintiff (Hamilton)

To be a Derelict for free food and a nuisances in connection thereof in the Downtown Houston, Texas area with services the following; (as described in Defendants complaint)

a.  The Beacon

b.  The Christ Church Cathedral

c.   Downtown, Houston Texas

        Interrogatories Question No. 4

        Defendant (Arthur) State exactly with full details upon what authority

And or judgment(s), computations Defendant (Arthur) used to make/arrive to a declaration to file in a Civil Action that the Plaintiff (Hamilton) himself is a Derelict

And attracted for free food only at the Beacon and a Nuisances of the Downtown Houston Texas area in connection thereof;

As described in the complaint of the Defendant (Arthur) against Christ Church Cathedral and the Beacon.

        Interrogatories Question No. 5

        Defendant (Arthur) State exactly with full details how is it that the Plaintiff (Hamilton) who is a current a client of the Beacon and Compass in connection to the “Holy Church” Namely Christ Church Cathedral

 And at the same time Plaintiff (Hamilton) whom is also simultaneously a Client of The U.S. Vet Center which is located one city block from the Defendant(s) Business Marine Building L.L.C.

Just at what point and time does the Plaintiff (Hamilton) poses a Health hazards conditions in regard to Urination and defecation as described in the complaint of (Arthur) against the Beacon;

When the U.S. Vet Center Hours of operation are from Monday through Friday 8am-8pm and Saturdays from 9am to 5pm which giving the factual computation of the Beacon Hours of operation at (4) days a week from 9am -3pm in comparison to the U.S. Veteran Center;

 As described above the Plaintiff most certainly and respectfully being in connection of a Veteran is afford many, many more opportunity to the possible placement of Urination

 And or Defecation in the downtown Houston Texas area to include up to 8 pm Monday through Fridays

 To include but not limited to the possible need for (Vomiting) can also be calculated in favor of the Plaintiff being in a healthy position from any said public health hazards in the Houston Downtown area as described by the Defendant (Arthur) in comparison to a none-Veteran client of the Beacon.